Gun Control Laws

April 10 2008 | apparentlly

[Redcloak]

U R stoopid.

(I shall elaborate later. My lunch hour is over.)

[trisham]

but if you read on you will see my point.

***************

Ah, no. I think not.

[FredZarguna]

Apparently a moron who despises the Bill of Rights.

But we do love the smell of ozone in the afternoon!

[paulcissa]

The mindset I assume is that if you do not like something or somebody you can always shoot them

Lost me right there. It's not worth my time to read the rest of the tripe, no excuse me....drivel attempting to disguise itself as journalism.

[Andonius_99]

Apparently...you were suspended from school for a few days and mommy and daddy are at work, so you’re here bugging us because you have nothing better to do?

[MarineBrat]

[messierhunter]

"Now the gun laws may not reduce crime but if you read on you will see my point."

Kinda hard to see a point that isn't there. If gun control laws do not reduce crime (and the evidence proves they don't), then there is no point, period. Tough laws on crimes involving guns is NOT gun control. Gun control is where they take away or reduce your right to purchase, own, and carry a gun. You can say that's not what you're trying to do all you want, but no one here is stupid enough to believe you. Congratulations on wasting your time and mine.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Here, let me fix that for (the now zotted Apparently)...

"but if you read on I part my hair differently you will see my point.

[MileHi]

Profound ignorance.

Thanks for sharing

[Nailbiter]

I am not sure from your post if you are advocating gun ownership,or gun control laws.

Let me enlighten you, start by reading up at JPFO, Jews for the preservation of gun control.

Also a well armed society is a polite society is not a license to kill.
It is however a society that believes in self protection.
I am unable to carry a cop in my pocket, however if I choose I should be able to carry a gun, under 2nd amendment.
As an aside, if I could could carry a cop in my pocket, I would choose a fiery redhead 5ft or so with a disposition to match.

Also guns do not kill people, people kill using guns,knives,baseball bats,2x4’s, their hands,coffee pots, pipes,cars,rocks,sticks and anything else that can cause great bodily harm.

I have the right to defend myself, politicians do not have the right to remove that right.
Many think they do, but they are wrong.

[WayneS]

You wrote: “The mindset I assume is that if you do not like something or somebody you can always shoot them...”

I offer the following as proof that you are wrong in this assertion: I haven’t shot YOU.

[21twelve]

“How about taking away alcohol that kills more people than guns. Keeping the last argument in mind there does seem to be a flaw in the arguments concerning car/knives/alcohol, those things related to deaths are considered accidents, meaning, even though someone died during a car accident it was not intentional.”

And later-

“Gun control laws are not to remove guns from law-abiding citizens but to remove the threat of misuse/accidents in order to protect the society.”

I love the way liberals “think”. And that is taking the view that getting into your car plastered and then hitting another car or pedestrian is an “accident”.

[wastedyears]

Zotted

[Hoffer Rand]

We’re SO cute!!

This was shaping up to be a boring Friday afternoon. Better now!!

[fightinbluhen51]

Apparently someone doesn’t have 3 pounds worth of gray matter.

[Rick.Donaldson]

Apparently is a DumbAss.

[workerbee]

Hey, thanks, I’ve always wondered what kind of 4th grade essay assignments they give at San Francisco P.S. #69.

[WayneS]

“Also guns do not kill people, people kill using guns,knives,baseball bats,2x4’s, their hands,coffee pots, pipes,cars,rocks,sticks...”

And don’t forget video game controllers. Those things need to be outlawed too.

[beltfed308]

RP are you going under a different name now?

[wastedyears]

Is the Glock pretty big, or is the cat pretty small?