Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wolf population grows by a third
Bozeman Chronicle ^ | March 19, 2008 | KARIN RONNOW

Posted on 03/19/2008 6:18:09 PM PDT by george76

Montana’s wolf population increased 34 percent over the past year, to an estimated 422 wolves in 73 packs...

The wolves are nearly equally distributed between northern and southern Montana...although the bulk of the population growth was in northwestern and far western Montana...

Wolves are still listed under the Endangered Species Act. Delisting was set for late March, but lawsuits are expected to delay that.

As for conflicts with ranchers, the FWP reported an increase in the number of confirmed cattle deaths due to wolves, from 32 to 75, and an increase in the number of sheep deaths, from four to 27.

Two llamas and three dogs also were confirmed killed by wolves...

“We know Montana’s wolves inhabit places where people live, work and recreate,” Sime said. “We expect and try to anticipate conflicts and gear much of our wolf-management work toward helping landowners reduce the risk of livestock depredations.”

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service planned to delist the gray wolves in the Northern Rockies n Montana, Idaho, Wyoming and parts of Washington and Utah on March 28.

The recovery goal, at least 300 wolves for three consecutive years, was reached in 2002 and has been exceeded every year since...

(Excerpt) Read more at bozemandailychronicle.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Idaho; US: Montana; US: Oregon; US: Utah; US: Washington; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: animalrights; ar; banglist; esa; g79; predatorywolf; usfws; wildlife; wolf; wolfattack; wolfattacks; wolfpack; wolfpacks; wolves; wolvesattack; yellowstone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
These are the huge Canadian wolves, not like the original smaller American wolves.

Next : waste more millions of taxpayer's money on expensive introductions of large predators from Africa, Asia...too?

.

1 posted on 03/19/2008 6:18:10 PM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

And the more wolves, the more they have to eat.

And after they decimate the deer and other animals in the wild, they will have to move closer to the cities.

This is already happening in some areas of Idaho.

Next come the ponies, horses, and dogs—none of which can stand up to an attack by a PACK of wolves.

Next it becomes impossible for people to venture into the wilderness—because even with a gun you can’t face an attack by four or five starving wolves at one time.

There is a reason people wanted to get rid of the wolves.
In the safe, tame 20th century, people forgot that reason.
They are about to relearn it.


2 posted on 03/19/2008 6:24:53 PM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce 22-250; jazusamo; Troublemaker; girlangler; SJackson; sergeantdave; claudiustg; LucyT

The wolf population achieved its recovery goal of 30 breeding pairs and 300 total wolves in the three-state region over five years ago...

“the Canadian grey wolf never inhabited the US Rocky Mts. ...the secret that the eco-fascists don’t want known - that the Canadian grey wolf is an invasive species...”

ht sergeantdave


3 posted on 03/19/2008 6:28:53 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

http://anatoliandog.org/isik-001.htm

Montana ranchers better get some of these yoruks and kangals...toughest wolf killers on the planet.

read this too, it’s fascinating: http://anatoliandog.org/isik-004.htm


4 posted on 03/19/2008 6:29:05 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny; Ladysmith; Diana in Wisconsin; JLO; sergeantdave; damncat; phantomworker; joesnuffy; ..

If you’d like to be on or off this Upper Midwest/outdoors/rural list please FR mail me. And ping me is you see articles of interest.


5 posted on 03/19/2008 6:33:15 PM PDT by SJackson ( G-d da*n America, J Wright; Don't tell me words don't matter!, BH Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: george76

It takes care of the stray cat and dog problem.


6 posted on 03/19/2008 6:34:05 PM PDT by Hamilcar_Barca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hamilcar_Barca; Myrddin; elkfersupper; SunkenCiv; MiWolvesSmokeaPackaDay

Elk, deer, ...too.


7 posted on 03/19/2008 6:39:21 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: george76

Picky grammar point; the wolves are not naturalized citizens of Canada, therefore not ‘Canadian’ wolves, rather Canada wolves, just like the geese.


8 posted on 03/19/2008 6:42:19 PM PDT by imagineer (common sense is oxymoronic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Thanks for the ping.

I noticed this morning that Idaho is taking action before the delisting actually happens. The animal and enviro wackos are going to go bonkers over this.

Bill gives animal owners right to kill harassing wolves

Associated Press - March 19, 2008 1:54 PM ET

BOISE, Idaho (AP) - The House has approved changes to state law that would let ranchers, outfitters and pet owners kill wolves harassing livestock.

House lawmakers voted 65-4 on Wednesday to give owners up to 72 hours to report wolves they've killed after catching them annoying, disturbing or stalking animals or livestock.

The Idaho Department of Fish and Game is rewriting its wolf laws, ahead of the expected lifting of federal Endangered Species Act protections this year.

The Senate has already passed the bill. It is now ready for Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter's signature.

LocalNews8.com

9 posted on 03/19/2008 6:43:49 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight
Next it becomes impossible for people to venture into the wilderness—because even with a gun you can’t face an attack by four or five starving wolves at one time.

Thanks for your input, you sound very knowledgeable on the subject.

However, don't you find it interesting that the article mentions the number a cattle. sheep and dogs killed by the wolves but they do not mention the number of people killed by the wolves.

Being as knowledgeable as you are on the subject I am sure you would know how many people have been killed by wolves in Montana in the time period referenced in the article.

Could you please provide the number of people killed by wolves along with a source for your data?

10 posted on 03/19/2008 6:46:14 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“The recovery goal, at least 300 wolves for three consecutive years, was reached in 2002 and has been exceeded every year since...”

So why go beyond this point? If the wolves are fine at a certain level, we still have them, and they don’t have to kill livestock and pets to find something to eat, then start culling the packs again!

Yeesh. If a Hayseed like me can figure that out, why can’t those with all the fancy animal management degrees? *SMIRK*


11 posted on 03/19/2008 6:46:34 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I expect years of lawsuits filed by the eco nuts.

Meanwhile the wolf populations will likely grow 30 percent per year...compounded.

Plus spread all over the west.


12 posted on 03/19/2008 6:47:26 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: imagineer

Yes, but...

If a chicken and a half can lay an egg and a half in a day and a half, how long does it take a grasshopper with a wooden leg to kick all the seeds out of a dill pickle?

Huh, Smart Guy? Huh? Huh? LOL!

I correct people on the “Canadian” versus “Greater” or “Lesser” CANADA Goose conundrum all the time, myself. They think I’m a know-it-all, too. But, what good is having all this knowledge unless one SHARES it? ;)


13 posted on 03/19/2008 6:50:19 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: george76

Just curious, but does the fish and wildlife service compensate ranchers for animals lost to wolves? If so then the ranchers have nothing to complain about. If not, then the FWS and the greenies got nothing to complain about if ranchers kill wolves.


14 posted on 03/19/2008 6:50:32 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

You’re correct, without a doubt there will be lawsuits.

But if the wolf population keeps growing at the present rate it will be a factor in those lawsuits, I believe.


15 posted on 03/19/2008 6:54:54 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: imagineer

Right on, a good point. Same as in Democrat party NOT Democratic party, right?


16 posted on 03/19/2008 6:57:27 PM PDT by brushcop (B-Co. 2/69 3rd Infantry Div., "Sledgehammer!" ...and keep hammering 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre; Carry_Okie; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; calcowgirl

The ranchers are supposed to be compensated if there is a licensed wildlife officer present before and during the wolf attacks.

This does not happen.

Wolf packs often kill at night without a USFWS official watching...thus lots of blood, paw prints, slashing marks...do not count after the attack.

Second, wolf packs chase pregant cows who then mis-carry their calves ...

Third, sheep and cows do not eat / put on weight when they are under stress from predators which costs the family ranchers money.

Most family ranchers have bank loans, taxes, feed and vet bills...


17 posted on 03/19/2008 7:02:31 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: george76

What’s the best caliber for wolf?


18 posted on 03/19/2008 7:06:40 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Myrddin

Myrddin is the expert :

What’s the best caliber for wolf?


19 posted on 03/19/2008 7:07:52 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: george76
The reintroduced wolves are getting a little bit shot around here.

Sometimes their tracking collars get attached to a train or long-haul tractor-trailer rig.

20 posted on 03/19/2008 7:12:18 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson