Posted on 03/18/2008 10:24:52 PM PDT by swampdweller
I think your assessment is accurate.
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/tables/ovracetab.htm
Here's the data from 2005:
Percent of All Homicides by Racial Composition of Victims and Offenders
White on White - 44.6%
Black on White - 8.8%
White on Black - 3.2%
Black on Black - 42.2%
_________________________________
And for rape:
http://www.roadtothemiddleclass.com/opeds.php?road=234
-snip-
"Table 42: Personal Crimes of Violence 2005: Percent distribution of single offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender."
Under "Rape/Sexual assaults" the survey reports 111,490 rape/assaults in 2005 in which a white was the victim.
The "perceived race" of the offender was reported as white in 44.5 percent of cases, black in 33.6 percent of cases, "other" in 19.6 percent of cases.
Where the victim of rape was black, in 36,620 cases, things were rather different. The "perceived race" of the offender was reported as black in 100.0 percent of cases.
White offenders? "0.0*" percent. The asterisk means that the sample included ten or fewer reports.
The federal crime statistics show that white-on-black rape was almost non-existent in the United States of America in 2005.
________________________
This is a very interesting question that this election may answer:
“one wonders whether the white community won’t begin to oberve this and wonder whether it really has an obligation to the black community anymore as it has been harangued over the years. If all the affirmative action, forced busing, cultural accomodations, high taxation and Mau-Mauing of racism over the past 30-40 years have merely brought us Jeremiah Wright’s bleatings in our face which we are required to accept - will white America continue to tolerate this? Or will some of the white guilt that so much of modern liberal dogma depends on melt away like so much burning wax?
Amen Brother, Amen.
So calling white Americans “blue eyed devils” is o.k. but calling nappy headed ho’s nappy headed ho’s isn’t.
Got it.
Barack Mcgovern Obama vs I’m an ass hmmmmmmm whom to root for here? I think I just sit back and watch two phonies have at it and hope both lose.
Maybe. But unless he's forced to withdraw, he's still going to arrive at the Dim Convention with the most votes, the most delegates, and with sizable public support. It should provide some great material for Rush.
ML/NJ
Even with the Democrat nomination, he will lose most of the White, Latino and Jewish vote.
Nobody outside of some blacks are going to be comfortable with his racism and black separatism.
“They’ve harmed themselves far more that any KKK could have dreamed.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Should be inscribed on some kind of monument.
Nice reply. The Democrat party is not headed for a train wreck as much as it is headed for a fork in the road. The first is to select Obama [redacted] Hussein according to the delegate count. He is damaged goods now-his hope is that enough MSM spin will change some minds. The second choice is to supecede the delegate count with a nod to Clinton. This is a garaunteed train wreck. Blacks will abandon the Democrats in large numbers come November.
Obama is the lesser of two evils, in their minds, I bet. With Obama on the ticket, the double standard of racism will unfold to the point of resolve. I suppose that is what you are talking about when you say "...lot less inclination toward political correctness...". I have recognized this double standard for a long time. It had to come out of the closet some time.
I stated a long time ago that Gen X and Y are going to reject the "Mau-Mauing of racism". It looks like it will happen sooner than I thought.
bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.