Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DC v. Heller - Montana prepares to secede
email

Posted on 02/19/2008 7:35:11 PM PST by djf

Secy of State Brad Johnson of Montana delivered a letter to the Washington Times about possible outcomes of the Heller decision.

Second Amendment an individual right

The U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide D.C. v. Heller, the first case in more than 60 years in which the court will confront the meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Although Heller is about the constitutionality of the D.C. handgun ban, the court's decision will have an impact far beyond the District ("Promises breached," Op-Ed, Thursday).

The court must decide in Heller whether the Second Amendment secures a right for individuals to keep and bear arms or merely grants states the power to arm their militias, the National Guard. This latter view is called the "collective rights" theory.

A collective rights decision by the court would violate the contract by which Montana entered into statehood, called the Compact With the United States and archived at Article I of the Montana Constitution. When Montana and the United States entered into this bilateral contract in 1889, the U.S. approved the right to bear arms in the Montana Constitution, guaranteeing the right of "any person" to bear arms, clearly an individual right.

There was no assertion in 1889 that the Second Amendment was susceptible to a collective rights interpretation, and the parties to the contract understood the Second Amendment to be consistent with the declared Montana constitutional right of "any person" to bear arms.

As a bedrock principle of law, a contract must be honored so as to give effect to the intent of the contracting parties. A collective rights decision by the court in Heller would invoke an era of unilaterally revisable contracts by violating the statehood contract between the United States and Montana, and many other states.

Numerous Montana lawmakers have concurred in a resolution raising this contract-violation issue. It's posted at progunleaders.org. The United States would do well to keep its contractual promise to the states that the Second Amendment secures an individual right now as it did upon execution of the statehood contract.

BRAD JOHNSON Montana secretary of state Helena, Mont. Montana, the Second Amendment and D.C. v. Heller


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; bradjohnson; heller; mt2008; mtsos; parker; rkba; secede; secession; secondamendment; separatism; statesecession; statesrights; union
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-218 next last
To: Jim Robinson

I guess we can all learn how to herd sheep or somethin!
Really, though, I’m digital now, and if I could get broadband in a cave somewhere, I could still work.
But it is nice to have things like kitchens and showers!

Hope 2008 finds you well and happy!
regards,
djf


81 posted on 02/19/2008 8:57:57 PM PST by djf (I think McCain deserves a chance. After all, he is on R side!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Republicanus_Tyrannus

IOW, Property values there would soar.


82 posted on 02/19/2008 8:59:21 PM PST by streetpreacher (Arminian by birth, Calvinist by the grace of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

“Don’t mess with Montana.”

Good idea. Montanans own, on average, eight guns per household.


83 posted on 02/19/2008 9:03:31 PM PST by Rennes Templar ( Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: guido911

Skiing is great at Bridger! I’ve often thought it was cold but that just keeps the snow from getting sloppy...


84 posted on 02/19/2008 9:10:59 PM PST by philled ("If AQ were on steroids, house leadership would be more interested in dealing with them." Kit Bond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: djf

bttt


85 posted on 02/19/2008 9:12:42 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

I’ll help build “THE FENCE”. Let me know when it warms up a bit.


86 posted on 02/19/2008 9:14:57 PM PST by wizr ("Give me liberty, or give me death." - Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

THANKS.

Fascinating.

I hope they make a LOT more noise about this.


87 posted on 02/19/2008 9:20:08 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR Class of 1998
I think the feds would use force if necessary to stop a secession

I'd drive to Montana and line up with them (the people of Montana that is).

88 posted on 02/19/2008 9:21:20 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: djf; All
I haven't found one reference to the 14th A. in this thread so far (corrections welcome). The reason that the 14th A. must be mentioned in any meaningful discussion concerning the 2nd A. is as follows.

John Bingham, the main author of Sec. 1 of the 14th A., included the 2nd A. when he referenced the first eight amendments as examples of constitutional statutes containing privileges and immunities that the 14th A. applied to the states. So there is no doubt in my mind that the 2nd and 14th Amendments protect the personal right to keep and bear arms from both the federal and state governments as much as any other constitutional privilege and immunity protects other personal rights.

See the 2nd A. in the middle column of the following page from the Congressional Globe, a precursor to the Congressional Record.

http://tinyurl.com/y3ne4n
Note that the referenced page is dated for more than two years after the 14th A. was ratified. So Bingham was evidently reassuring his colleagues about the scope and purpose of the ratified 14th Amendment.

So bear in mind that what DC v Heller is essentially testing is how corrupt the Supreme Court is.

89 posted on 02/19/2008 9:40:50 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicanus_Tyrannus
And if it is over 2/3rds of the States, a very unsettling option becomes available - a Constitutional Convention could easily then be called.

So the Court can ignore the amended Constitution as they ignore the present version. Seems a lot of bother for very little result. Especially, as you say, when there is a big downside risk to the process.

90 posted on 02/19/2008 9:42:07 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Republicanus_Tyrannus
And if it is over 2/3rds of the States, a very unsettling option becomes available - a Constitutional Convention could easily then be called... And that’s something for the very, very last resort in my book. Mainly because I don’t trust us to do one correctly unless there’s absolutely no other option.

Worry not. There are safeguards. Read the essay I wrote that was vetted by "Congressman Billybob", a constitutional lawwyer.

"A Convention for Proposing Amendments...as Part of This Constitution"

91 posted on 02/19/2008 9:45:06 PM PST by Publius (A = A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: djf

Rather than seceding, if the Court rules the wrong way and says that the 2nd is a “collective” right, then the legislature there should declare each person between the ages of 16 and 80 to be members of the state militia, subject to annual call-up. They should be required to show up bearing their own personal M4, M16, M14 or M249 (all full auto weapons). When the governor signs the bill, you now would have a few hundred thousand people eligible to purchase brand-new full autos.


92 posted on 02/19/2008 9:53:42 PM PST by Ancesthntr (An ex-citizen of the Frederation trying to stop Monica's Ex-Boyfriend's Wife from becoming President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
Good idea. Montanans own, on average, eight guns per household.

So what's that make, about 8,000 guns in the whole state?

We Texans have fewer guns per household (reportedly about 2), but that makes for about 45 million guns - and that's probably low.

93 posted on 02/19/2008 10:01:06 PM PST by Ancesthntr (An ex-citizen of the Frederation trying to stop Monica's Ex-Boyfriend's Wife from becoming President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Redmen4ever
"If Obama is elected, we all should secede. "

AMEN, BTTT!

94 posted on 02/19/2008 10:01:32 PM PST by matthew fuller (Barack Hussein Obama- Just words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior
> Doubt the Feds would invade to assert Federal law.

Not only that, but when you throw the Posse Comitatus Act into the fray, it would have the potential to be a very mixed-up ball of wax. For DC, anyway -- sounds like Montana has this situation understood quite well.

It would be great if MT Sec'y Johnson filed an additional amicus curiae, regarding the Compact, to supplement the arguments made in the brief initiated by Kay Bailey Hutchison.

95 posted on 02/19/2008 10:09:45 PM PST by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Thanks! That was an excellent and quite inspiring article.


96 posted on 02/19/2008 10:27:38 PM PST by Republicanus_Tyrannus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: RTO

Montana (and I have a business there) brings to mind the phrase: “a whole lot of nothing”.


97 posted on 02/19/2008 10:34:48 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: djf

It’s definitely an option. Depending on the outcome, I may move there too.


98 posted on 02/19/2008 10:38:40 PM PST by NRA2BFree ("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crapgame

OK! Just let our part of California (The High Sierra) re-join Nevada.


99 posted on 02/19/2008 10:42:03 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (If you don't want people to get your goat, don't tell them where it's tied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
The per capita income is one of the lowest in the Union. In constant competition with Mississippi for lowest, if my memory serves.

If something like this were to happen it would be fascinating to watch how many corporations move their legal incorporation from Delaware to Montana.

100 posted on 02/19/2008 11:00:25 PM PST by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson