Posted on 02/13/2008 8:25:12 AM PST by george76
Born exactly two years before Dallas.
The man at the centre of a John F. Kennedy mystery is revealing new details, including his name and his birthday an astonishing date should he indeed be related to the Kennedy clan.
Jack Worthington also agreed to allow The Globe and Mail to take his photograph, but only after his name was revealed by a Vancouver publication. He had been speaking with The Globe over the past few days on condition of anonymity.
The British Columbia man is asking the Kennedys to provide a DNA sample so tests can be run to determine whether there is a match with the 35th president of the United States.
President Kennedy was assassinated on Nov. 22, 1963 Mr. Worthington's second birthday. He presented a U.S. passport, Canadian visitor's visa and driver's licence indicating his date of birth.
(Excerpt) Read more at theglobeandmail.com ...
I am not remotely surprised; liberal elites have no morals.
Whether true or false, the guy stands to make a buck....
So is he a lawyer who wants to retire big...or what??
John-John obviously reflected Jackie's side of the family.
The ‘Toons just offered him a lifetime stipend to do so, as revenge against Ted for endorsing Obama.
Mebbe.
Mom is still alive. She lives in Texas and was introduced to JFK by LBJ. When approached about this story she closed the door in the reporters face.
My own father looked more like JFK than that guy.
My first thought on seeing the head shot was Bob Costas then Tom Brokaw.
Really? Do you have any links?
He doesn’t need to request DNA from the Kennedy’s.
1. For one, it must be in a number of different law enforcement databases.
2. A FOIA request should do it - request that the national archives come up with a sample.
I'll say. Those guys' DNA is splattered up and down most of the east coast.
I doubt if this would surprise anyone. JFK was a real womanizer. Now, if they took a picture of the ‘son’ smiling, we might see more of a resemblance with the Kennedy mouth and teeth.
Or introduce him to some of his new friends from Chicago.
it’s a bit wordy to say “put of wedlock children”
illegitimate is a lot more polite than bastard
and has been in use for centuries
but now worries, being born out of wedlock which as you rightly pointed out is not the child’s fault barely carries any scorn for mom anymore either.
i see nothing to celebrate about the rise of children out of wedlock in our culture.
i have 5 kids and lived a full younger life and took great care to try not to do that
Not at all. The bone structure in the face is totally different.
The guy’s a phony.
That’s right! My dad was also born out of wedlock and it sure wasn’t HIS fault.
Isn’t that amazing?
Simple to tell DNA Test!
In seeking out my parents’ Norwegian genealogy, I found a few cases of out of wedlock births. They seemed to just accept it and take care of them, or family members did.
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.