Posted on 01/07/2008 4:57:35 AM PST by IrishMike
Rush Limbaugh’s detractors never learn. They’ve tried everything to come between Rush and his more than 20 million listeners, intending to destroy his appeal and impact. But it’s a hopeless, almost laughable endeavor. They led boycotts against his advertisers -- yet his show continues to generate more revenue than any other on radio. They pressured his affiliates to drop his program, but he’s still heard on more than 600 stations -- more than any other talk host. They tried to keep him off Armed Forces Radio, of course, but he has the most popular program on the military’s radio network.
Will Not Be Intimidated
Try as they might, the Rush-haters cannot silence him, or persuade his massive audience to tune him out. After two decades as the top talk host in the nation, his ratings are stronger than ever. He is more popular and influential than ever. And yet, the Rush-haters persist. Their favorite tactic is to twist Rush’s on-air remarks to make them fit their stereotypes and to advance their political objectives.
Rush has never bowed to efforts by the left to control our national debate through intimidation tactics. A few months ago, when the Democrats shamelessly used Graeme Frost, a 12-year-old who had been in a terrible car accident, to promote the expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) entitlement, it was Rush, with information from folks on conservative websites such as Free Republic, who told America that the Frost family was not as it was represented to be by the Democrats and the Big Media. The Frosts had been financially able to purchase health insurance but apparently had chosen not to. Among other things, the parents sent their two daughters to an expensive private school, at an apparent cost of $40,000 per year. For exposing this sham, Rush was accused of picking on the poor seventh grader. Well, as Rush explained at the time, she’d been used, but not by him -- by her own parents, the Democrats and the media.
Home Run After Home Run
When David Ehrenstein, a Hollywood writer, penned an opinion piece last year in the Los Angeles Times, characterizing Illinois Democratic Sen. Barak Obama as “The Magic Negro,” Rush seized the moment to expose liberal hypocrisy with a parody -- “Barak the Magic Negro” (played to the tune of “Puff the Magic Dragon”). The Rush-haters pounced, claiming falsely that Rush, not Ehrenstein, was employing a racial slur against Obama. No, Rush was ridiculing the left, and once again, it hit home. And when Rush was pressured to stop playing the parody, he defiantly played it over and over again.
During the 2006 elections, the Democrats shamelessly used Michael J. Fox in targeted congressional races to campaign against Republicans who opposed taxpayer-financed stem-cell research, including running television ads featuring Fox. And in those commercials, Fox was visibly shaking from the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. The political message was clear: Vote against these Republicans because they are heartless people who oppose curing diseases. Well, Rush would have none of it. He criticized the Democrats’ use of Fox, Fox’s politicization of a medical issue and the dishonesty of the ads. As usual, the Democrats and liberal media distorted Rush’s argument, accusing him of mocking Fox and his ailments. They sought to deflect criticism from their own crude political behavior. But again, they failed.
Most Important Voice on the Right
What is it about Rush that drives the left crazy (that is, crazier than they already are)? The answer is actually quite simple: Rush is the most important voice in the conservative movement. Others want to be, some claim to be, but he is. More than any conservative politician, columnist or pundit, Rush speaks for us. His opinions are principled and consistent. He has a brilliant mind and a voracious appetite for knowledge and truth, all of which he uses behind his golden EIB microphone to teach and persuade as he cuts through the daily media clutter. He has the guts to say what so many of us are thinking to ourselves. And Rush’s likable and optimistic personality and entertaining style attract increasing numbers of conservative adherents. Liberals consider Rush and his talk show the greatest threats to their agenda and pursuit of power, and they’re right.
The most stunning and desperate assault on Rush was launched just a few weeks ago when the ethically challenged Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) -- armed with propaganda prepared by a Clinton front group that calls itself “Media Matters for America” (which also claims to be a tax-exempt charitable foundation) -- tried to use the power of his office to squelch Rush with a threatening letter, signed by dozens of his Democratic colleagues, to Rush’s Clear Channel broadcast partner. What was all the fuss about?
During a Morning Update broadcast, Rush criticized fake soldiers such as Jesse MacBeth and the left’s support for them. MacBeth claimed to have served in Iraq as an Army Ranger. MacBeth was embraced by the anti-war movement and appeared on several media outlets solely because of his vicious smears against the United States military. But MacBeth was a fraud. He was forced out of the Army in 44 days and never received the Purple Heart, as he had claimed. A press release from the United States attorney’s office that prosecuted MacBeth, among other fake soldiers, states:
“Jesse MacBeth, 23, Tacoma, Wash., sentenced today in connection with his fraudulent claims of military service. MacBeth sought medical benefits claiming to suffer from PTSD related to service in Iraq and Afghanistan, in fact, Macbeth was discharged from the Army about a month after he joined. MacBeth never traveled outside the U.S. with the Army. Macbeth duped reporters, claiming to be a decorated Army Ranger who had witnessed war crimes.”
In a subsequent conversation with a caller who complained that the media “never talk to real soldiers,” Rush referred to these fake soldiers as “phony soldiers.” There was nothing remotely controversial about his statement. But Media Matters, putting words in Rush’s mouth, claimed that Rush had challenged the patriotism of real soldiers who had actually served but opposed the Iraq War.
Advocate of the Military
Now, anybody who has spent any time listening to Rush knew this was false. There is no greater advocate -- on or off the air -- for the military and its mission. And unlike Reid and most of the other anti-war Democrats, over the years Rush has quietly made significant contributions to the Marine Corps-Law Enforcement Foundation. But it didn’t matter. Reid ran with the lie, as did many of his fellow Democrats and media friends, believing they could damage Rush’s reputation, drive a wedge between Rush and his audience and advance the Democrats’ political agenda. To my knowledge, never before has a Senate leader attempted to use the force of government against a private citizen in this way. And rather than condemn Reid, the Big Media cheered him on by repeating his lies.
So, the stakes were extremely high. Would a powerful Democratic politician and Clinton front group be able to cripple Rush and damage the conservative cause through intimidation and dishonest tactics? Well, they don’t know Rush like we do. They picked a fight with the wrong guy.
Rush confronted, mocked and exposed Reid and Media Matters as dissembling bullies. And in an act of absolute brilliance, he put the Reid letter -- signed by the likes of Hillary Clinton (N.Y.), John Kerry (Mass.), Teddy Kennedy (Mass.) and other anti-war senators -- up for auction on eBay, not only pledging that all proceeds would go to his beloved
Marine Corps-Law Enforcement Foundation, but announcing that he’d match the winning bid. The auction brought $2.1 million, and when combined with Rush’s matching donation, the Reid letter generated a whopping $4.2 million for the foundation! But Rush wasn’t finished. He challenged Reid to raise or contribute an equal amount for the troops. We’re all still waiting.
For this, and all else he does every day to defend our founding principles, HUMAN EVENTS confers on Rush Limbaugh its 2007 Man of the Year Award.
A case could be made that the attacks on Huckabee is a set-up to get Huck in the news as a "Rush tamer." A Rush tamer would endear Mike to the media, and work like a Trojan Horse. That is a tough case to make. Rush will never warm up to McCain, he might reluctantly submit to Rudy. Rush would never accept Rupaul. So what does that leave us with? Fred? Rush knows Fred cannot catch fire. .
Fait Accompli.
I guess Rush just doesn’t fall into the “diverse, tolerant, inclusive and multicultural” part of neoliberalism.
Yep. The good General was robbed.
Not at all. It is simply not yet Petraeus' time.
2008 will be Petraeus's year. That will be when the phenomenally successful plans he has implemented so well in 2007 will come to fruition in theater AND to the forefront in the minds of the American electorate during the Presidential campaigns. It's all in the timing.
Ditto.
So Rush Limbaugh is man of the year but not General Petraeus who has been leading our troops to VICOTRY in Iraq or President Bush whose strong and steadfast leadership is making us win the war.
___________________________________
The one thing Pres. Bush and Petraeus dearly needed was a gifted communicator to prevent the complete public collapse for the Iraq mission. Rush is that communicator. Rush makes war against dangerous ideas that subvert liberty and democracy, the very things trying to destroy the birth of democracy in Iraq. Rush is a living example of what Iraq will need in the future to make war against those predatory ideas seeking to destroy a blood stained democracy. Pres. Bush, Petraeus, and Rush are a team and each one does what the other cannot do. Rush has my vote this year. :0)
God bless Rush!! God bless Mark!!
Always on alert for my marching orders from the man who runs America!
Congratulations to Mr. Limbaugh and thanks to “The Great One” for the Freerepublic plug!!!
mrs
Three Cheers For Rush.
jw
Damn right!! And it’s about time Pres. Bush awards him with the Presidential Medal of Freedom!!
The argument then happily visited the old "hypocrisy" charge, which says that we must dismiss as "wrong", void, null, and without force EVERYTHING ever said or argued by anyone (make that "any conservative") found to be deficient in his own exercise of principle (and excusing ourselves from having any principles at all, of course, if we're liberals).
I love Rush, but TGO is my favorite!
If you have the Rush ping list, you may want to give them a heads up to this thread.
There are plenty here on FR that hate Rush.
Rush is responsible for converting millions to the conservative side. It drives the Democrats totally insane.
My favorite part of the whole deal was when Dingy Harry gave a speech talking about how "we" raised all that money for a worthy cause, trying to take some credit for it... Sort of like Al Queda taking credit for urban renewal in lower Manhattan! It was priceless, and Reid has scuttled away from the whole issue. I can't wait until his next election campaign so this whole matter can come to the forefront again!
Mark
MEGGA, MEGGA DITTOS!!!!!!!!!
Congratulations, Rush, and thanks for all you do.
when they hear el rushbo!
I do the same thing. Some have given me the #1 hand gesture. I also believe his audience is much larger than he or anyone else thinks. I've heard him in many work places around Austin. Some libs get totally outraged when they hear him.
Will do. Thanks for the heads up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.