Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/31/2007 4:28:57 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lowbridge

When will they be able to choose their species?


2 posted on 12/31/2007 4:29:58 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Just when I think that the California legislature has reached the apex of stupidity, they prove me wrong.


5 posted on 12/31/2007 4:33:20 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
Detective Phoebe O'Hara: "Well, I see you untaught them the basics." /obscure
8 posted on 12/31/2007 4:35:15 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
If I choose that I am a girl, can I qualify for a Title IX Scholarship to a Division I school? I can't play any sports...but neither can most other Title IX “athletes!”
12 posted on 12/31/2007 4:41:03 PM PST by Cowboy Bob (Real men don't vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

I pity the poor teachers who have to remember who’s what. When does California drift off the continent so they can be their own country?


14 posted on 12/31/2007 4:43:04 PM PST by no more apples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Next years ‘girls’ softball teams from CA will run the table in the nationals.


17 posted on 12/31/2007 5:01:26 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

19 posted on 12/31/2007 5:05:50 PM PST by Bobalu (I guess I done see'd that varmint for the last time....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Sadly, I know one of these students. She is a young teen who has an intact family but now has decided she is a gay boy. She is dressing as a boy, cutting her hair as a boy, going by a masculine name, and the teachers are required to go along. Her counselor also acquiesces. So does her whole family. She wants the reconstruction surgery (I believe the medical term is the addadictomy) but is far too young.

I really don’t even know how to treat this person any more so I kind of avoid them all.


20 posted on 12/31/2007 5:05:53 PM PST by Yaelle (Thompson: the intelligent conservative's best choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

It’s a Zelda bill! She also wants to decide how we get our health care provided. Sheila Kuehl, whatta gal! Uh... or... something.


21 posted on 12/31/2007 5:10:28 PM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Schools are spending so much time on these liberal sexual agendas it is no wonder our school kids are falling further and further behind all other children in the world.


23 posted on 12/31/2007 5:21:18 PM PST by technomage (Radical Islam gives me the urge to go to the bathroom and drop a big mohammed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

This oughta drive a few more away from kali. what a bunch of queerbait sh-t!!!


24 posted on 12/31/2007 5:23:52 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
Our schools should not be used as incubators for social experiments

That's what schools are! Schools are incubators for the next generation's culture, politics, and religion. It has **always** been this way. It is the very essence of education of youth. It is axiomatic!

Education of children is not now, never was, and never can be religiously, politically, or culturally neutral!

The Marxists who have total control of our government schools know this axiom very well, and they have armies of Lenin's Useful Idiots to help them destroy our nation's freedom.

and our kids should not have to be subjected to the radical agenda of Sacramento politicians.

Yes, they will be subject to the radical agenda! If parents and/or the students balk at this agenda, government school bureaucrats will send out armed police. ( Real bullets in those guns on the hip!) The parents have Sophie's choice: Send their kid to government school or REAL prison with REAL prison guards, with REAL bullets in their guns!

Some lucky parents can **ransom** their kids. They can pay ransom in the form of private and home schooling expenses. Personally, I call this ransom money the "Freedom of Religion, Culture, and Politics" school tax! Another name could be "The Freedom of Conscience" school tax!

It's time for our schools to get back to the basics and fend off these ridiculous efforts to brainwash our kids

No! No! No!....This is NOT the solution! The worse the schools get, the faster people will abandon them, and the quicker the whole painful, writhing, blob ( mis-named government "schooling") will finally DIE!

The solution is to get your own kids out NOW! Even if they aren't in California, this nuttiness will soon infect your kid's school. Then join with other like minded people. Organize a MASSIVE school tax revolt, and shut these government "school" cesspools down! Permanently and totally!

25 posted on 12/31/2007 5:31:58 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

This sounds totally loopy, but I wonder if it’s really designed to be applied across the board the way some of the scare stories about it suggest. A lot of it can make sense in certain situations, but obviously not with a thoroughly male kindergartener who announces he is now a “she” and prohibits the teacher or principal from “disclosing” this to his parents.

On the other hand, I had a passing acquaintance many years ago with someone to whom the part about “it prohibits the teachers from disclosing a student’s chosen gender to the student’s parents” would very reasonably have applied. She (as she had chosen to be) was born an anatomical hermaphrodite, and had a nutcase father who insisted she was a he (apparently for no better reason than that he wanted a son) and forbade her from expressing or demonstrating any inclination to be female. In middle school, she left the house every morning dressed as a boy, and changed clothes (IIRC with the help of a sympathetic teacher who lived nearby), so as to arrive at school dressed as a girl, and reversed the process on the way home.

In her 20s or 30s she finally got surgery and was living with a completely female identity, though she was fairly open about her history (not in a “flaunting it” way, but actually largely because some radical feminist idiots on the campus of the college she was attending “outed” her, claiming she was a “fake” woman, yadda, yadda). At any rate, as an adolescent/teen, she would been subject to beatings at home, if teachers had discussed with her parents the fact that she was presenting herself as a girl at school, and it makes sense to have laws that protect teachers and school administrators who choose to withhold information in this sort of situation, and to some extent to protect an adolescent or post-adolescent child from disclosure to parents.


28 posted on 12/31/2007 5:56:11 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

These self-identified gender changing children and their “families” will demand publicly financed surgery to objectify their perverse fantasies. Liberals will be delighted to give it to them along with counseling and welfare benefits. Even now public health and welfare bureacrats are concocting verbiage and “medical necessity” protocols to mutilate these children and make them lifetime wards of the state.


30 posted on 12/31/2007 6:18:05 PM PST by Combat_Liberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pesto

ping!


32 posted on 12/31/2007 6:24:01 PM PST by basil (Support the Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
Ok?...So?...How are Christian teachers going to respond?

They know that the government school from which they accept a pay check is setting a terrible example, and teaching a falsehood by example and published policy.

Do they kneel before God each morning and ask Him, “Help me accept a pay check for helping with this anti-Christian travesty?”

Obviously, the students see Christian teachers opening the doors to a government school that officially teaches principles that are in complete contradiction to Christian belief. They see Christian teachers assist, abet, and support a system of instruction that is in complete contradiction to Christian teaching. It isn’t a “little mistake “ once in a while, or even a “big mistake”. It is OFFICIAL, daily, on-going, published policy that is utterly anti-Christian!

Does the Christian teacher ask God, “Lord, help my students not see me as being in complete agreement with this anti-Christian philosophy but only as a person who helps it a little bit?”

When the Christian teacher hands out textbooks that are influenced by 777, surely he KNOWS that truth has been distorted. In some cases it is out right lies.

Does the Christian ask God, “Help me hand out lies to my students today?” Does he pray, “ Should I tell them it is lies but I will give it to them anyway?”

Does the Christian teacher ask God, “Help me to be silent today about the lies regarding 777 and other school policies and curriculum? Help me to lukewarm, weak, and subservient to this atheistic monolith?”

Does the Christian teacher pray to God, “Help me be sneaky and sly today so I can “sneak” a grain of Christianity to my students today?”

85% of Christian government school students leave the faith within 2 years of graduating from high school. Contrast that to 90% ( and more) of homeschool student who do remain faithful.

Maybe Christian kids leave the faith, because of the example of Christian teachers. If Christ spits out the lukewarm is it any wonder that students would be nauseated as well? Is the job of the true missionary going to be harder or easier with adult graduates of government schools?

Christian teachers by agreeing to accept a paycheck from these schools, by agreeing to hand out social studies text books filled with anti-American lies, by helping to open the doors, by aiding and abetting their anti-Christian colleagues, by being timid, by writing checks to the NEA have indeed taught a POWERFUL lesson about Christians to ALL of their students.

They have taught their students that Christian teachers:

1) Will aid an abet what they know is false for a paycheck.
2) Will Send money to the NEA.
3) Will hand out textbooks filled with what they know are lies.
4) Are timid, weak, sneaky, sly, and lukewarm

That is what Christian teachers are doing every day!

Solution:

Christian teachers it is time to GET OUT! QUIT!

Your most urgent and important mission field is your own children and those of your congregation. With today’s technology it is possible to open Christian schools, small one room school houses, homeschools, and “micro-schools” in homes and church basements.

Once your own congregation has a strong system of Christian education bring in as many non-members as possible, provided that it does not overwhelm the Christian culture of your system. Mentor these non-Christian children and families. Teach, support, and nurture these parents.

Finally, Harvard has a 37 Billion dollar endowment ( with a “B” as in billion”). Christians could do the same for private scholarship foundations that could give private scholarships to private schools. EVERY child in the U.S. could have a free Christian education. We are a wealthy nation we could do this, if Christians **wanted** to do it!

33 posted on 12/31/2007 6:27:34 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Let’s look on the bright side. Just think how easy it will be to sneak a peek in the high school girl’s locker room. Just declare yourself to be a “girl” for the day and walk right in! Tomorrow, you can go back to being a boy.


35 posted on 12/31/2007 6:34:17 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
SB 777 also uses this redefinition of gender to forbid educators from discriminating against any individual employee, student or other person based upon that individual's unspoken claim of being male or female, regardless of his or her actual sex.

UNSPOKEN claim? Given this whole new gender-ambiguity thing, how is it possible to tell what gender someone has decided they are unless they tell someone? So if I happen to wear a pair of cargo pants, a hoodie, and skateboard shoes into school one day, am I a 'male' because I'm 'presenting as a male' in an 'unspoken' way?
37 posted on 12/31/2007 6:45:31 PM PST by Hyzenthlay (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson