Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pleasures of Assassination
http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm/frm/13921/sec_id/13921 ^ | Theodore Dalrymple

Posted on 12/30/2007 8:35:43 PM PST by ventanax5

When President Bush described the assassination of Benazir Bhutto as cowardly, he chose precisely the wrong word. (He was not the only person to do so, but he was the most important one to do so.) In fact, it was a very courageous act: for it requires great courage to assassinate someone in the middle of a large and volatile crowd favourable to that person, and above all then to blow yourself up just to make sure that you have succeeded. Not many people have that degree of courage: I certainly don’t.

The two Islamic militants whose telephone call was putatively intercepted by the Pakistani security services, and who are claimed by them to have been the organisers of the assassination, were quite right when they called the two men who did it ‘brave boys.’ They were brave all right; I do not see how it can very well be denied. Even if the transcript of the telephone call turns out to be a complete work of fiction, the authors of it got something right that President Bush got wrong

(Excerpt) Read more at newenglishreview.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: anthonydaniels; bhutto; bushsfault; dalrymple; pakistan; theodoredalrymple
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: ventanax5

I often find myself in agreement with Dalrymple, but not here. To my mind, courage can only be manifest in a selfless and virtuous act; courage is a sacrifice, or a potential sacrifice, so that good may vanquish evil. Assassins and suicide bombers, no matter how reckless, no matter how fanatical is their belief in their evil cause, or their eagerness to die for it, can never be courageous. Their goal is only to inflict misery and fear. A zealot who dies for his cause is not courageous because he doesn’t care whether he lives or dies. A hero wants to live to see a good cause triumph, but is prepared to die to deny evil a victory.


41 posted on 12/30/2007 10:14:30 PM PST by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

Incredibly silly arguments.


42 posted on 12/30/2007 10:22:57 PM PST by GregoryFul (is a bear a bomb in a bull?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5
and above all then to blow yourself up just to make sure that you have succeeded.

I'd wager he blew himself up to keep from getting torn to pieces by the crowd.

43 posted on 12/30/2007 10:25:12 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

I agree...when you value life, it is brave to give it up...when you believe that you will receive 72 virgins upon your death, the same act may be lustful, but it isn’t brave.


44 posted on 12/31/2007 1:02:08 AM PST by willyd (Tickets, fines, fees, permits and inspections are synonyms for taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Interesting point to ponder, one that theologians have grappled with for ages...was Jesus’ sacrifice courageous given that he was in the unique position of eternal salvation being a certainty without the need for faith?


45 posted on 12/31/2007 2:37:43 AM PST by Dave Elias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Dave Elias

No disrespect meant by the way - I’m just interested to hear other’s take on the nature of Christ’s sacrifice.


46 posted on 12/31/2007 2:40:37 AM PST by Dave Elias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5
It's a long drive between courage and just plain stupid. The enemy isn't in any way courageous. They are brain washed and don't know any better because they've been programmed to NOT think for themselves. A person allowed to think for himself wouldn't buy into that 70 virgins and whatever else they are told from the time they can hear.
47 posted on 12/31/2007 2:49:50 AM PST by Picklezz (HUNTER: SOLID - A Conservative's Conservative. He's the man for the job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave Elias
Good grief man, Jesus didn’t need salvation. He provided it. He was doing the will of God the Father. It had nothing to do with courage. He asked if “this cup could pass from me....)but he freely and willingly accepted what He came to do. To save our miserable souls. Not His. He always knew what His purpose was in coming to earth. No surprise to Him.
48 posted on 12/31/2007 2:56:52 AM PST by Picklezz (HUNTER: SOLID - A Conservative's Conservative. He's the man for the job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Picklezz

His soul was not then and is not now, miserable. Sorry to have accidently implied that.


49 posted on 12/31/2007 2:59:33 AM PST by Picklezz (HUNTER: SOLID - A Conservative's Conservative. He's the man for the job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

It’s an idiotic point of debate.


50 posted on 12/31/2007 3:05:12 AM PST by Glenn (Free Venezuela!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Oh, I have an idea that Daylrymple is a harmless, bespectacled academic/English language analyzer with no agenda other than to stretch 500-word articles into 1500 words on what the meaning of “is” is....and in this case, bravery vs. cowardice.

No, he is one of the most insisive minds in conservative thought in Europe.

He is defining the difference between bravery and courage. Something that the west doesnt get.


51 posted on 12/31/2007 3:07:40 AM PST by Chickensoup (If it is not permitted, it is prohibited. Only the government can permit....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

—he is a retired doctor who usually writes scathng articles on the failure of the Brit socialized medicine scheme or the deterioration of British society—


52 posted on 12/31/2007 4:25:57 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

>> and above all then to blow yourself up just to make sure that you have succeeded. <<

Suicide does not take courage; it is the ultimate cowardly act. Courage is being willing to risk what you desire to keep.


53 posted on 12/31/2007 4:39:50 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Picklezz

But what was the sacrifice?


54 posted on 12/31/2007 7:17:59 AM PST by Dave Elias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank; Chickensoup
I wasn't putting the good doctor down. Au contraire, I was pointing out in a light-hearted way that I didn't think he had some kind of radical agenda as some posters seemed to suspect.

Happy New Year!

Leni

55 posted on 12/31/2007 8:16:58 AM PST by MinuteGal (Three Cheers for the FRed, White and Blue !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp; MinuteGal
Before you leap to judgment, I suggest you click on the link and read the entire piece.

Dalrymple takes the time to explain exactly what he's saying. And he is correct.

Otherwise good men can be cowards.

And evil men can be courageous.

But neither would be an admirable man.

Dalrymple is a superb essayist...he always makes his readers think.

56 posted on 12/31/2007 8:42:56 AM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: okie01
See my # 55.

Leni

57 posted on 12/31/2007 8:45:29 AM PST by MinuteGal (Three Cheers for the FRed, White and Blue !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

this is the same thinking as Bill Maher regarding the ‘courage’ of the hijackers who flew the planes into the World Trade Center compared (per Maher) with the cowards in the US military who merely drop bombs from several thousand feet in the air.


58 posted on 12/31/2007 8:46:05 AM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

Interesting. I wonder if the shooter knew about the bomber; or vice versa.


59 posted on 12/31/2007 8:57:25 AM PST by AndrewB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dave Elias

Why go off topic?


60 posted on 12/31/2007 9:39:51 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson