Skip to comments.
'Israel will attack Iran on its own'
Jerusalem Post ^
| 12/21/2007
| Staff
Posted on 12/21/2007 11:32:01 AM PST by mojito
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
The MSM does all it can to protect the Iranian regime. Isn't that interesting?
1
posted on
12/21/2007 11:32:04 AM PST
by
mojito
To: mojito
To: camerakid400
Dead women and children and young men, even if they are obstinate and deluded women and children and young men, is not cool.
3
posted on
12/21/2007 11:39:02 AM PST
by
djf
(I'm too busy to be jolly. Tis the time to cook a collie!)
To: mojito
‘Bruce Riedel, a former CIA official and senior adviser to three US presidents, George W. Bush among them, told the American Newsweek magazine in an article published Friday. ‘
I’ll just point out that isn’t exactly a ringing endorsement of this guy’s ‘expertise’ given the results the CIA has produced for the the last SEVEN US President’s, George W Bush among them....
Gee, is it a ‘slam dunk’?
4
posted on
12/21/2007 11:39:08 AM PST
by
Badeye
(The two “no” votes were cast by Ron Paul and leftwing nut Dennis Kucinich.)
To: mojito
It’s interesting because the MSM (aka the Lamestream Media) does all it can to coddle and cozy up to the Buffoon from Plains (aka Jimmah Cartah) who royally screwed the pooch in the Middle East during the four agonizing years of his term by stabbing the Shah in the back, calling the Assahollah Khomeini a ‘godly man’ and turning Iran into an ENEMY of the United States (when previously, Iran had been our ALLY and a force for stability).
Were it not for Carter, Iran would not now be run by Islamofascist mullahs and thugs, threatening Israel and the stability of that region, and the entire world.
Funny we never hear anything about ‘why’ Iran turned into an enemy of the United States, when the reason is as plain as the fake chicklet-grin on Carter’s lying face.
5
posted on
12/21/2007 11:39:30 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(Hunter-Bolton '08 !! Patriots who will settle for nothing less than *Victory* in the War on Terror!)
To: mojito
While some US experts doubt Israel's ability to tackle Iran alone - well when you have many sides of an issue, someone needs to be wrong.
To: djf
Dead women and children and young men, even if they are obstinate and deluded women and children and young men, is not cool.
If you're talking about Iranian victims of an Israeli strike, perhaps you would prefer to see those women, children and young men grow up to be adult terrorists doing the bidding of the Islamofascists in Tehran?
Little snakes grow up to be big snakes.
If someone stomps on a snake nest, the fault is in those who bred, hatched and nurtured the little vipers, not in those who eliminated the threat.
7
posted on
12/21/2007 11:42:01 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(Hunter-Bolton '08 !! Patriots who will settle for nothing less than *Victory* in the War on Terror!)
To: mojito
Israel should do it.The US should provide them with satellite intelligence and bunker-buster ordnance.
8
posted on
12/21/2007 11:42:07 AM PST
by
expatpat
To: djf
I dont understand your comment.
I support Israel if they want to launch precision airtrikes against Iranian nuke sites. We are not talking about bombing civilians here
To: camerakid400
I’m not saying it can or can’t be done. We all know of the stories of collateral damage, etc.
What I’m saying is war is not a “cool” thing.
Even when it’s necessary, even when it’s successful, it is a tragic thing.
Just my opinion. Maybe I’m too old fashioned.
10
posted on
12/21/2007 11:48:07 AM PST
by
djf
(I'm too busy to be jolly. Tis the time to cook a collie!)
To: camerakid400
All Israel has to do is send someone to Iran and say “You want peace or war? You tell us.” If they want war, give it to them. If they want peace, give it to them. Get this crap over with.
11
posted on
12/21/2007 11:48:08 AM PST
by
RC2
To: djf
Dead women and children and young men, even if they are obstinate and deluded women and children and young men, is not cool.
Civilians don’t usually live at nuke sites.
Protecting yourself from utter destruction by a country wanting to dance on your grave. Better than cool.
Who is the aggressor?
To: mojito
I’m not a very religious person, but it sure seems to be unfolding an awful lot like the Bible said it would.
13
posted on
12/21/2007 12:15:23 PM PST
by
Bon mots
To: Bon mots
Maybe you are in the process of becoming a religious person.
14
posted on
12/21/2007 12:18:25 PM PST
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
To: Bon mots
Im not a very religious person, but it sure seems to be unfolding an awful lot like the Bible said it would.
You can selectively interpret the Bible to predict anything...including what you'll be having for dinner tomorrow night.
15
posted on
12/21/2007 12:19:02 PM PST
by
peyton randolph
(tag line taking a siesta)
To: mojito
If Israel eventually has to destroy 100% of the population of Iran in order to preserve itself from the genocidal reality of Islam for another decade, then I for one would not shed a single tear. They would have acted in self-defence.
The problem is that - if his entire country died - Ahmadinejad wouldn’t shed a tear either. His people would have died as besijji martyrs in the name of the Prophet. This is why almost no human cost is too high in order to stop Ahmadinejad’s type of fanatic from getting hold of nuclear weapons.
16
posted on
12/21/2007 12:21:26 PM PST
by
agere_contra
(Do not confuse the wealth of nations with the wealth of government - FDT)
To: expatpat
The US should provide them with satellite intelligence and bunker-buster ordnance.
We allready have.
To: djf
What Im saying is war is not a cool thing.Despite the fact that they act to the contrary, I don't think Iran is stupid enough to go to war with the U.S. simply because we eliminated their chance to get nuclear weapons... I would expect brinkmanship and a LOT of international heat, but no war...
18
posted on
12/21/2007 12:25:38 PM PST
by
logic
(Support Duncan Hunter for the 2008 GOP presidential nominee. He is THE conservative candidate!!)
To: peyton randolph
ou can selectively interpret the Bible to predict anything...including what you'll be having for dinner tomorrow night.by all means, indulge me... What will I be having for dinner tomorrow night. According to the King James version please...
19
posted on
12/21/2007 12:27:55 PM PST
by
logic
(Support Duncan Hunter for the 2008 GOP presidential nominee. He is THE conservative candidate!!)
To: peyton randolph
You can selectively interpret the Bible to predict anything...including what you’ll be having for dinner tomorrow night.
Wow. Even when the Bible states the who, what, where, and even the why of a historical event hundreds of years before its occurance?
Have you ever read the Bible?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson