1 posted on
12/19/2007 1:45:34 PM PST by
tobyhill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: tobyhill
2 posted on
12/19/2007 1:47:02 PM PST by
lowbridge
To: tobyhill
It's moments like this when I wish I had a subscription to Time just so I could cancel it.
3 posted on
12/19/2007 1:47:12 PM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Government is the hired help - not the boss. When politicians forget that they must be fired.)
To: tobyhill
Will Britt drag the story out of them? Ping me if he does!
4 posted on
12/19/2007 1:47:19 PM PST by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: tobyhill
....well they did it to clean up the unfair bias at their magazine.
Now they can present a completely unbiased, non partisan point of view all the time...
5 posted on
12/19/2007 1:48:18 PM PST by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President!)
To: tobyhill
The Times they are a-changin’.......or possibly not.......
6 posted on
12/19/2007 1:48:38 PM PST by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: tobyhill
Kinda goes with
Time's choice for
Commie Person of the Year. Time is irrelevant.
8 posted on
12/19/2007 1:49:14 PM PST by
madison10
To: tobyhill
Not surprising. The same bunch just lauded Czar Vladimir I for his "extraordinary feat" of bringing "stability" to Russia.
To someone who's not a lefty on crack there's nothing "extraordinary" about jailing or assassinating your enemies, stuffing ballot boxes or installing a nonentity as a successor to keep the seat warm for you while you serve your term limit suspension.
To: tobyhill
Time, does anyone read this rag.
Any magazine that chooses a Commie for their man of the year deserves to die a slow death.
The last time I picked up a Time magazine was a couple of years ago in my liberal attorneys office.
Even then the copy I scanned was a couple of months old and just as boring and out of sync with the country and insignificant to real people in fly over country as it is today.
11 posted on
12/19/2007 1:50:37 PM PST by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
To: tobyhill
The last time I picked up a Time magazine (in my Doctor's office a week ago) it was about half the size it used to be 10 years ago.
Keep up the good work, Time, and keep on shrinkin'.
12 posted on
12/19/2007 1:52:17 PM PST by
reagan_fanatic
(Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
To: tobyhill
The exact reasons for the departures of Mr. Krauthammer and Mr. Kristol, both high-profile backers of the Iraq war, are not entirely clear.That's an odd statement. The reasons are clear as a bell to me.
To: tobyhill
Mark Helprin the former ABC Political Director and now one of the executives of Time Magazine sent this memo to his staff at ABC News durinf the 2004 election of Bush vs. Kerry.
October 8 2004:
"It goes without saying that the stakes are getting very high for the country and the campaigns - and our responsibilities become quite grave
I do not want to set off (sp?) and endless colloquy that none of us have time for today - nor do I want to stifle one. Please respond if you feel you can advance the discussion.
The New York Times (Nagourney/Stevenson) and Howard Fineman on the web both make the same point today: the current Bush attacks on Kerry involve distortions and taking things out of context in a way that goes beyond what Kerry has done.
Kerry distorts, takes out of context, and mistakes all the time, but these are not central to his efforts to win.
We have a responsibility to hold both sides accountable to the public interest, but that doesn't mean we reflexively and artificially hold both sides "equally" accountable when the facts don't warrant that.
I'm sure many of you have this week felt the stepped up Bush efforts to complain about our coverage. This is all part of their efforts to get away with as much as possible with the stepped up, renewed efforts to win the election by destroying Senator Kerry at least partly through distortions.
It's up to Kerry to defend himself, of course. But as one of the few news organizations with the skill and strength to help voters evaluate what the candidates are saying to serve the public interest. Now is the time for all of us to step up and do that right. "
14 posted on
12/19/2007 1:52:47 PM PST by
avacado
To: tobyhill
Sounds like a career enhancer for the both of them to be rid of Time.
15 posted on
12/19/2007 1:52:59 PM PST by
jazusamo
(DefendOurMarines.com)
To: tobyhill
Time magazine has terminated its relationships with its two conservative big government advocate warhawk columnists, Charles Krauthammer and William KristolThere, fixed that...Support or non support of hawkish foreign policy does not define conservative. As much as Chuck, Bill, and Fox News may like to think it does.
16 posted on
12/19/2007 1:54:26 PM PST by
billbears
(Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
To: tobyhill
Time’s time is in the past.
19 posted on
12/19/2007 2:01:25 PM PST by
Antoninus
(Republicans who support Rudy owe Bill Clinton an apology.)
To: tobyhill
That’s the reason they’re losing their ass: Too many conservatives.
20 posted on
12/19/2007 2:02:35 PM PST by
Crawdad
(I cried because I had no shoes, until I met a man who had no class.)
To: tobyhill
Good for them. The only purpose of Time Magazine is to make the prospect of an immanent root canal seem less painful, by comparison.
22 posted on
12/19/2007 2:04:46 PM PST by
andy58-in-nh
(Kill the terrorists, secure the borders, and give me back my freedom.)
To: tobyhill
Wouldn’t know. I avoid even picking up the magazine.
23 posted on
12/19/2007 2:05:23 PM PST by
RobbyS
To: tobyhill
As a conservative, Krisol strikes me as room temperature milk. Even that was too conservative for Time. LOL The rag must be farther out left than I thought. And that’s saying something.
24 posted on
12/19/2007 2:08:44 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
To: tobyhill
Charles Krauthammer and William Kristol? They’ll do fine without Time.
Time’s conservative readers left long ago anyway.
29 posted on
12/19/2007 2:13:17 PM PST by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: tobyhill
They’ll probably replace them with a stalwart conservative like Linda Chavez.
32 posted on
12/19/2007 2:19:42 PM PST by
Plutarch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson