To: al baby; Auntbee; BJClinton; Dashing Dasher; dfwddr; exile; feinswinesuksass; Finger Monkey; ...
"Tard" refers to the ping list members and not to the subject of the thread!
List of Ping Lists
To: SevenofNine
To: EveningStar
Selective prosecution? What cave has Forbes been living in the last couple of hundred years?
4 posted on
12/11/2007 10:24:42 AM PST by
Wolfie
To: EveningStar
The Bonds indictment is more like a whiff of the French Revolution, which descended into terror, than of the American Revolution, which led to our Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the idea that the law will be applied fairly and in a timely manner to one and all.
5 posted on
12/11/2007 10:24:44 AM PST by
cornelis
To: EveningStar
Yet Bonds stands to serve as many as 30 years in the slammer. There having been no crime committed, prosecutors trotted out an old-time fallback: perjury.
Like Libby.
6 posted on
12/11/2007 10:29:10 AM PST by
cornelis
To: EveningStar
Steve Forbes doesn’t have more important issues on his mind?
Wow. What the hell happened to HIM? Forget Balloon head Barry, whats up with Forbes?
8 posted on
12/11/2007 10:37:40 AM PST by
Badeye
(Free Willie!)
To: EveningStar; Fast Ed97; Flavius Josephus; GreatOne; highimpact; JRios1968; Leto; Moose4; ...
Makes you wonder what Romey will say about Steve Forbes' article on Barroids
"Have a take, don't suck or you'll get run......."9 posted on
12/11/2007 10:38:11 AM PST by
JRios1968
(Faith is not believing that God can. It is knowing that God will. - Ben Stein)
To: EveningStar
Whathave we learned? NEVER talk to a Fed.............
10 posted on
12/11/2007 10:38:57 AM PST by
Lexington Green
(Not one dime to Hollywood traitors)
To: EveningStar
Yup. Same as Libby. Case never should be in the courts.
11 posted on
12/11/2007 12:09:55 PM PST by
byteback
To: EveningStar
Mr. Forbes makes some persuasive points
So, if I'm on Bonds' jury, I would give him a well-deserved break...say, 29 1/2 years.
13 posted on
12/11/2007 12:25:34 PM PST by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: EveningStar
Anyone who doesnt run out ground balls, takes Saturday off in front of the home fans, and is the antithesis of a team player deserves to be prosecuted.
15 posted on
12/11/2007 1:22:45 PM PST by
samadams2000
(Someone important make......The Call!)
To: EveningStar; All
...just heard Mitchell report comes out on thursday....early report says 60 to 80 players on report
18 posted on
12/11/2007 2:56:49 PM PST by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: EveningStar
"His case is, sadly, part of a pattern of judicial abuse, the stretching of the law like rubber to allow prosecutors to go after unpopular figures in business, politics and, now, sports."
My argument is this:
Even if Forbes is right, so what? Should the law be structured in such a way that it protects blatant a**holes? I think not.
19 posted on
12/11/2007 5:45:35 PM PST by
Jaysun
(It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
To: EveningStar
Bonds may not be the most charismatic guy but hey he has used athletic performance enhancing drugs and is being prosecuted while the city of San Fransicko offers healthcare to cover genital mutilation and the same steroid drugs to the pyschologically ill folks to become “transgendered.”
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson