Skip to comments.
Mob Rule (Steve Forbes on Barry Bonds)
Forbes.com ^
| December 10, 2007
| Steve Forbes
Posted on 12/11/2007 10:21:48 AM PST by EveningStar
Barry Bonds is being shafted by the legal system. His case is, sadly, part of a pattern of judicial abuse, the stretching of the law like rubber to allow prosecutors to go after unpopular figures in business, politics and, now, sports. The indictment recently returned against him could have been rendered years ago. Why now? Because this season Bonds, an ill-tempered, arrogant, disliked athlete, broke the record for lifetime home runs. Had he not set a new record or had he been a friendly figure beloved by the fans, prosecutors would never have touched him...
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barrybonds; judicialtyranny; nifongism; politicalwitchhunt; roidrage; steveforbes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: al baby; Auntbee; BJClinton; Dashing Dasher; dfwddr; exile; feinswinesuksass; Finger Monkey; ...
"Tard" refers to the ping list members and not to the subject of the thread!
List of Ping Lists
To: SevenofNine
To: EveningStar
Selective prosecution? What cave has Forbes been living in the last couple of hundred years?
4
posted on
12/11/2007 10:24:42 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: EveningStar
The Bonds indictment is more like a whiff of the French Revolution, which descended into terror, than of the American Revolution, which led to our Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the idea that the law will be applied fairly and in a timely manner to one and all.
5
posted on
12/11/2007 10:24:44 AM PST
by
cornelis
To: EveningStar
Yet Bonds stands to serve as many as 30 years in the slammer. There having been no crime committed, prosecutors trotted out an old-time fallback: perjury.
Like Libby.
6
posted on
12/11/2007 10:29:10 AM PST
by
cornelis
To: Wolfie
Forbes must be on drugs, just like Bonds.
7
posted on
12/11/2007 10:34:31 AM PST
by
MBB1984
To: EveningStar
Steve Forbes doesn’t have more important issues on his mind?
Wow. What the hell happened to HIM? Forget Balloon head Barry, whats up with Forbes?
8
posted on
12/11/2007 10:37:40 AM PST
by
Badeye
(Free Willie!)
To: EveningStar; Fast Ed97; Flavius Josephus; GreatOne; highimpact; JRios1968; Leto; Moose4; ...
Makes you wonder what Romey will say about Steve Forbes' article on Barroids
"Have a take, don't suck or you'll get run......."
9
posted on
12/11/2007 10:38:11 AM PST
by
JRios1968
(Faith is not believing that God can. It is knowing that God will. - Ben Stein)
To: EveningStar
Whathave we learned? NEVER talk to a Fed.............
10
posted on
12/11/2007 10:38:57 AM PST
by
Lexington Green
(Not one dime to Hollywood traitors)
To: EveningStar
Yup. Same as Libby. Case never should be in the courts.
11
posted on
12/11/2007 12:09:55 PM PST
by
byteback
To: EveningStar
I’d say in this case, “tard” applies to the thread subject.
12
posted on
12/11/2007 12:14:41 PM PST
by
JZelle
To: EveningStar
Mr. Forbes makes some persuasive points
So, if I'm on Bonds' jury, I would give him a well-deserved break...say, 29 1/2 years.
13
posted on
12/11/2007 12:25:34 PM PST
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: cornelis
There is no chance in hell that Bonds will do anything remotely close to that even if convicted, which is doubtful to begin with considering the trial is in San Francisco.
And our entire system of justice depends on people testifying truthfully on the stand when they swear to do so. All Bonds had to do was obey his oath, especially considering that he was granted immunity for his testimony.
He chose not do so in the desperately vain and arrogant hope of preserving his bogus legacy, and now he's paying the price for it.
14
posted on
12/11/2007 12:31:59 PM PST
by
jpl
(Dear Al Gore: it's 3:00 A.M., do you know where your drug addicted son is?)
To: EveningStar
Anyone who doesnt run out ground balls, takes Saturday off in front of the home fans, and is the antithesis of a team player deserves to be prosecuted.
15
posted on
12/11/2007 1:22:45 PM PST
by
samadams2000
(Someone important make......The Call!)
To: samadams2000
How about police on steroids? Should they be prosecuted too? Or should we just look the other way when they come down with ‘roid rage and quietly pay a settlement to the victims’ families?
16
posted on
12/11/2007 2:21:24 PM PST
by
weegee
(If Bill Clinton can sit in on Hillary's Cabinet Meetings then GWBush should ask to get to sit in too)
To: weegee
Police on steroids didnt cause my beer price at the ball park to go to $10. Thats the real crime.
17
posted on
12/11/2007 2:56:44 PM PST
by
samadams2000
(Someone important make......The Call!)
To: EveningStar; All
...just heard Mitchell report comes out on thursday....early report says 60 to 80 players on report
18
posted on
12/11/2007 2:56:49 PM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: EveningStar
"His case is, sadly, part of a pattern of judicial abuse, the stretching of the law like rubber to allow prosecutors to go after unpopular figures in business, politics and, now, sports."
My argument is this:
Even if Forbes is right, so what? Should the law be structured in such a way that it protects blatant a**holes? I think not.
19
posted on
12/11/2007 5:45:35 PM PST
by
Jaysun
(It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
To: samadams2000
retro-ballpark construction, not steroids, are more to blame for the higher prices of ballpark beer.
And for the record, the Expos had the lowest beer price anywhere. I think it was like $3 or $4 for 40 (44?) ounces. They only had 3,000 people going to the games.
20
posted on
12/12/2007 5:55:55 AM PST
by
weegee
(If Bill Clinton can sit in on Hillary's Cabinet Meetings then GWBush should ask to get to sit in too)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson