Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NAFTA Superhighway Mid Continental Corridor is under way
JOE HUGELIN ^ | 08 DECEMBER 2007 | THE CANADIAN

Posted on 12/08/2007 10:21:28 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist

Two provinces, Manitoba through its Speech from the Throne, and Alberta, through a map of NAFTA Trade Corridors have provided strong evidence that there are plans for a NAFTA Superhighway, or Mid-Continent Trade Corridor. President Bush and Prime Minister Harper dismissed this idea after the Montebello meeting as comparable to planning an "interplanetary" superhighway or a scare tactic whereby a "conspiracy" is laid out.

There is no conspiracy. Plans are going forward. This question is as yet unanswered: does what now recognized as reality stands alone or is part of a wider plan? The one Former Mexican President Fox spoke of a as "a new vision", first NAFTA, then integration through the Security and Prosperity Partnership.

The American Presidential candidates are discussing the existence of what is contained in the Manitoba Speech from the Throne and the Albertan North American Trade Corridors map. Americans concerned about their country losing sovereignty in a North American Union are circulating YouTubes contrasting the reality of the Speech, and Map, to the words of those denying the Superhighways' existence.

Though our political system differs, Canadians will do well to watch the influence of these contributions from Canada as Americans select their next president. Will the person selected be following the denial policy of President Bush or charting a different course?


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: canada; cuespookymusic; icecreammandrake; naafta; superhighway
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-167 next last
To: Dog Gone; AuntB; yorkie
It's not about a road, Dog. It's about something MUCH bigger than that, but, you already know that.

NASCO CORRIDOR/NAFTA Super Highway Included within their Corridor plans are rails:

News coming on the NAFTA Rail road along the super-corridor

NAFTA Corridors


Lazaro Cardenas - Kansas City Corridor

The second picture above is a screen shot of first page and link to pdf file.
61 posted on 12/08/2007 3:51:55 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

There have been several threads lately, some with maps of greater specificity and completeness. The better ones show a corridor running to James Bay, which would connect to Hudson Bay and the Northwest Passage when it reopens, and the west coast route goes to Fairbanks, which makes no sense at all unless the Siberia-Alaska connection in included.


62 posted on 12/08/2007 3:54:12 PM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Why do you hate highways?

Nice straw man. Why do you hate American sovereignty?

63 posted on 12/08/2007 3:54:14 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Take the red pill, and discover how deep the rabbit hole goes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

I remember that movie. They drank deer blood and peed in the radiator. That’s all I remember.


64 posted on 12/08/2007 3:55:46 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Take the red pill, and discover how deep the rabbit hole goes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The goal is to open new harbors to get stuff we want shipped in and stuff we want shipped out. It's nothing more sinister than that.

The EU was once a coal trading agreement. Nothing more sinsiter than that.

65 posted on 12/08/2007 3:57:13 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Take the red pill, and discover how deep the rabbit hole goes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

I never realized that roads to bordering countries eliminated our sovereignty. If so, it was lost at least 150 years ago.

Who knew?


66 posted on 12/08/2007 4:01:07 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I see your point- otherwise it would go south to Fairbanks. Hmmm.

Odd- the Bering strait doesn’t seem like a logical way to ship goods, but what do I know- I’m a Floridian.


67 posted on 12/08/2007 4:02:40 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Take the red pill, and discover how deep the rabbit hole goes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Along with the idea of inland ports and the trade agreements to make them possible, that’s what you’ll eventually get.

Again, see the EU.


68 posted on 12/08/2007 4:04:35 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Take the red pill, and discover how deep the rabbit hole goes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Hey, look at page 4 of that PDF- there’s a road heading right through Laredo.

You probably know what’s happening in Laredo.


69 posted on 12/08/2007 4:07:55 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Take the red pill, and discover how deep the rabbit hole goes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

They are serious about a railroad and pipeline link across.


70 posted on 12/08/2007 4:08:29 PM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I’m learning something new. thanks!


71 posted on 12/08/2007 4:12:01 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Take the red pill, and discover how deep the rabbit hole goes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Actually, the railroads linking the eastern states with the western states was the beginning of the end.


72 posted on 12/08/2007 4:14:37 PM PST by RichRepublican (Good fences make good neighbors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt; All

My question is why did Paul EARMARK $13,000,000 for it if it isn’t real and he’s against it?

Ron Paul’s BACKDOOR EARMARK

*#20. $13 million for I-69 highway project, is the Trans-Texas corridor project that many claim is the first leg of the NAU, NAFTA Superhighway.

http://ttc.keeptexasmoving.org/projects/i69/

“Interstate 69 is a planned 1,600-mile national highway connecting Mexico, the United States and Canada. Eight states are involved in the project. In Texas, I-69 will be developed under the Trans-Texas Corridor master plan.”

http://i.cnn.net/cnn/interactive/allpolitics/0706/popup.congress.earmarks/pdfs/tx.14.paul.pdf


73 posted on 12/08/2007 4:17:12 PM PST by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

>>”Obviously, you haven’t been able to determine which side I’m on”<<

Side? SIDE?!

What does this thread have to do with “SIDES”?

Com’mon, guy. (Or gurl).

Look at the facts. You want legit articles - not Human Events and WND, Jerome Corsi, Swiftboat Vets, right?

Geeze. Where have you been? This didn’t just start yesterday. I don’t mean to sound rude here, but you seem to disregard articles using words like “World Nut Daily”.

My gramma always told me you can’t convince a person who has a ‘closed mind’ about anything - so don’t even waste your energy trying.


74 posted on 12/08/2007 4:19:01 PM PST by yorkie ( For God so loved the world........................ that He didn't send a committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; yorkie
I never realized that roads to bordering countries eliminated our sovereignty. If so, it was lost at least 150 years ago.

But, you do know. Nice try, but your fake facade is showing, Dog. Post something other than your pro-globalist opinions which can even come close to refuting documents that prove your claims are either outright lies or, at the very least, WRONG.

Another thorny issue is sovereignty. Again, K.C. SmartPort, Inc. and city officials have denied that the facility will be sovereign territory of Mexico. However, the documents reveal otherwise. An email record from Chris Gutierrez, president of K.C. SmartPort, dated June 21, 2004, noted, “This space [for the customs facility] would need to be designated as Mexican sovereign territory and meet certain requirements.” A 2004 Logistics Today article, “Going for Broke,” also highlighted the sovereignty issue: “One holdup now is that the U.S. Department of State wants to know the exact location of the building which will house the Mexican Customs Project, which SmartPort will ultimately provide. State is involved because the facility will be sovereign Mexican territory.” The Southern Growth Policy Board, a public policy think tank, mentions the sovereignty angle on its website: “Meanwhile, Smart- Port negotiated with the Mexican Customs service to locate a facility in Kansas City — on Mexican sovereign territory.”

75 posted on 12/08/2007 4:19:59 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

I do!


76 posted on 12/08/2007 4:20:43 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: em2vn; Hydroshock; hedgetrimmer
No! The goal is to use Mexican ports instead of U.S. ports where the labor costs are highter. Therefore, Mexicans can do jobs Americans will no longer have. All thanks to “W” our bean eating version of Jimmy Carter. Carter hates Jews and “W” just has a strong dislike for Americans who are doing jobs that Mexicans can do cheaper.

I've been wondering that myself and I'm glad to see another say it as well, there ar times that I think "W" is the Republican version of Jimmy Carter. Let's face it, Carter gave away the Panama Canal, "W" is giving away our sovereignty, both times the economy was in a slump or at least not too great (the current numbers are really a lie), and both are/were soft on immigration, Carter had the Cuban criminal boat people, "W" has the illegals. The only thing Carter was better than "W" is the search for alternative energy, I know "W" has mentioned the hydrogen economy, but in reality, that is worse than robbing Peter to pay Paul, just think of all the extra propwer plants you would need to extract all the hydrogen we need from water, unless they were all atomic plants, we would end up with more net pollution than we have now. At least Carter put in solar water heaters in the White House.

BTW, pinging the usual crowd.
77 posted on 12/08/2007 4:30:04 PM PST by Nowhere Man (RIP, Corky, I miss you, little princess!!! (Corky b. 5-12-1989 - d. 9-21-2007))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

I’m bored with this. I’ve fought countless battles with you and those like you who think roads are bad, that there is some grand conspiracy to merge with Mexico, blah blah blah.

I don’t check in on threads like this very much anymore, but I did this one to see if anything changed. No, it didn’t.

There’s no chance of changing your opinion, just as you have no chance of changing mine. As far as you’re concerned, we’ll be spending pesos when the ribbon-cutting ceremony for a new highway is opened.

I obviously do not know how to successfully argue against that mentality, and I’ll only attempt it for a couple hours a month.


78 posted on 12/08/2007 4:30:38 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

The pushback on this is impussiant compared to the resistance that Eisenhower recieved when he started the National Defense Highway System. When they started condemning huge swaths across the country for the Interstates there was near rebellion in the provinces. The battles were titanic and formed some of the basis for Eisenhower being labeled a communist by far right groups.


79 posted on 12/08/2007 4:31:23 PM PST by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

So don’t respond to me.

Respond to the documents WITH DOCUMENTS.

Thank you.


80 posted on 12/08/2007 4:34:02 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson