Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ovrtaxt

I never realized that roads to bordering countries eliminated our sovereignty. If so, it was lost at least 150 years ago.

Who knew?


66 posted on 12/08/2007 4:01:07 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone

Along with the idea of inland ports and the trade agreements to make them possible, that’s what you’ll eventually get.

Again, see the EU.


68 posted on 12/08/2007 4:04:35 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Take the red pill, and discover how deep the rabbit hole goes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone

Actually, the railroads linking the eastern states with the western states was the beginning of the end.


72 posted on 12/08/2007 4:14:37 PM PST by RichRepublican (Good fences make good neighbors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone; yorkie
I never realized that roads to bordering countries eliminated our sovereignty. If so, it was lost at least 150 years ago.

But, you do know. Nice try, but your fake facade is showing, Dog. Post something other than your pro-globalist opinions which can even come close to refuting documents that prove your claims are either outright lies or, at the very least, WRONG.

Another thorny issue is sovereignty. Again, K.C. SmartPort, Inc. and city officials have denied that the facility will be sovereign territory of Mexico. However, the documents reveal otherwise. An email record from Chris Gutierrez, president of K.C. SmartPort, dated June 21, 2004, noted, “This space [for the customs facility] would need to be designated as Mexican sovereign territory and meet certain requirements.” A 2004 Logistics Today article, “Going for Broke,” also highlighted the sovereignty issue: “One holdup now is that the U.S. Department of State wants to know the exact location of the building which will house the Mexican Customs Project, which SmartPort will ultimately provide. State is involved because the facility will be sovereign Mexican territory.” The Southern Growth Policy Board, a public policy think tank, mentions the sovereignty angle on its website: “Meanwhile, Smart- Port negotiated with the Mexican Customs service to locate a facility in Kansas City — on Mexican sovereign territory.”

75 posted on 12/08/2007 4:19:59 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone

The pushback on this is impussiant compared to the resistance that Eisenhower recieved when he started the National Defense Highway System. When they started condemning huge swaths across the country for the Interstates there was near rebellion in the provinces. The battles were titanic and formed some of the basis for Eisenhower being labeled a communist by far right groups.


79 posted on 12/08/2007 4:31:23 PM PST by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
I never realized that roads to bordering countries eliminated our sovereignty.

Why no..There is no invasion, our sovereignty is fine, borders secured...Everything is OK...Government is your friend...Be happy.

Dallas Texas last year 2006 -

500,000 illegal aliens and their supporters march on Dallas Texas making demands and threats.


88 posted on 12/08/2007 5:05:37 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson