Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army desertion up 80 percent since Iraq war
MSNBC ^ | 11/16/2007 | AP

Posted on 11/16/2007 5:58:25 PM PST by mngran2

Soldiers strained by six years at war are deserting their posts at the highest rate since 1980, with the number of Army deserters this year showing an 80 percent increase since the United States invaded Iraq in 2003.

While the totals are still far lower than they were during the Vietnam War, when the draft was in effect, they show a steady increase over the past four years and a 42 percent jump since last year.

“We’re asking a lot of soldiers these days,” said Roy Wallace, director of plans and resources for Army personnel. “They’re humans. They have all sorts of issues back home and other places like that. So, I’m sure it has to do with the stress of being a soldier.”

The Army defines a deserter as someone who has been absent without leave for longer than 30 days. The soldier is then discharged as a deserter.

According to the Army, about nine in every 1,000 soldiers deserted in fiscal year 2007, which ended Sept. 30, compared to nearly seven per 1,000 a year earlier. Overall, 4,698 soldiers deserted this year, compared to 3,301 last year.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; deserters; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
Like I said yesterday in another thread, here's one good way to deal with this problem:


1 posted on 11/16/2007 5:58:29 PM PST by mngran2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mngran2

MSNBC forgot the smiley face icon in title.


2 posted on 11/16/2007 6:01:20 PM PST by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mngran2

Thank you..Ready, Aim, FIRE!!!


3 posted on 11/16/2007 6:01:22 PM PST by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mngran2

It is no wonder since Congress seems to be cheerleading for the terrorists. The fact that we’re having these desertions in an all volunteer Army says a lot about the question of liberals and Congressional traitors undermining the war effort.


4 posted on 11/16/2007 6:03:23 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mngran2
It's a time of war, so deserters should be shot.

That last statement is so simple even a liberal/democRAT/socialist could understand.

5.56mm

5 posted on 11/16/2007 6:04:48 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mngran2

...And the rate through the 90’s was... What?


6 posted on 11/16/2007 6:04:49 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caisson71

And we’re supposed to BELIEVE this loser network MSNBC?

In a pig’s eye.

(I’m a Vietnam vet and on the volunteer list for Iraq. F#$# you Keith Untermann!)


7 posted on 11/16/2007 6:07:10 PM PST by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mngran2
I’m assuming the numbers include those who joined with the intention of causing problems. Like Scott Beauchamp (yes, I know he’s not a deserter, just a seditious bastard).
8 posted on 11/16/2007 6:07:40 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
...And the rate through the 90’s was... What?

Well Clintoon was kicking out soldiers who wanted to stay in.

9 posted on 11/16/2007 6:10:50 PM PST by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mngran2

80% of the common sense and brain-cells in Congress have deserted in the same time period....but there’s no trumpeting of THAT fact.


10 posted on 11/16/2007 6:11:13 PM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mngran2
9 out of 1000? That's nearly 1%!!!! Oh the hugh manatee!

Not happy about those figures, but I think that a less than 1% rate of total screwups is not worth the newsprint. As an employer, I'd be ecstatic if only 1% of the people I hired were total failures.

And, better that they went AWOL than quit in combat.

11 posted on 11/16/2007 6:12:39 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

You referring to the ones who wanted to tell, whether or not they were asked?


12 posted on 11/16/2007 6:13:15 PM PST by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

I’m sure that there is an optimal rate of desertion, and it’s not zero.


13 posted on 11/16/2007 6:15:04 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mngran2

MSNBC What a bunch of idiots they give no context to these retarted summations... Obviously leaving after boot-camp like the phony war writer is not deserting.... OK MSNBC lets get a real tally simple question....

HOW MANY DESERTED WHILE THEY WERE IN THE WAR ZONE ?

What none... zero...

So much for your liberal attempts to sway publica opinion against our bravest.


14 posted on 11/16/2007 6:15:49 PM PST by tomnbeverly (The sour sounds of liberal whining is sure to scare away any chance of success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mngran2
The soldier is then discharged as a deserter.

More junior high level understanding by a so-called journalist. The soldier is declared a deserter in order to move him from the unit roster and the service active strength. Subsequent discharge is the province of court-martial or administrative discharge board.

May sound petty to some but as a former Navy personnelist I find such sloppiness infuriating.

Oh, as to the 80 percent increase, a doubling of one is two. There are not thousands upon thousands of deserters.

15 posted on 11/16/2007 6:17:42 PM PST by jimfree (Freep and ye shall find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mngran2

In any very large organizations there will always be some losers.

It’s not surprising that desertions are up, since the penalties for deserting have steadily decreased.

Also, you always get these kinds of adjustments when a period of peace gives way to a period of war—namely, because of people who signed up not expecting to have to fight. Many of those make the accommodation to the new and tougher conditions, but some don’t.


16 posted on 11/16/2007 6:18:07 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mngran2
According to the Army, about nine in every 1,000 soldiers deserted in fiscal year 2007

9 in a 1000! We are doomed! Soon there will be no army left! Give me a break. How does this compare to the years before the war?
17 posted on 11/16/2007 6:18:37 PM PST by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mngran2

These numbers aren’t all that bad but the real shame falls on the Democrats in congress and elsewhere in government who have promoted division in the time of war and cast dispersion onto the honor of our troops. This is really a non story which is trying to shift momentum back to failure now that Iraq back on track and is going to be a clear success if let continue on the current track.

The real story is how Iraq is quickly becoming a non story and how the beating of a dead horse by the Democrats in trying to end a war that will end of its own accord when the work is done has really left the antiwar movement with zero momentum. Eventually it will become a joke if it hasn’t already become one in the eyes of the general public who aren’t passionately behind a withdrawal no matter how dissatisfied they’ve been with the progress of the war.

The problem the Democrats and the antiwar fools have is a simple one and that is Iran and the clear prospects of a withdrawal from Iraq leaving the whole region to fall under a nuclear Iran with the inevitable conclusion of the eventual formation of a radical Islamic superpower in the MiddleEast. Does anyone in their right mind desire that to happen? No. Iran keeps the focus on the real threat and the more the focus of the war shifts to Iran the greener the prospects for Iraq become.

Iran is the elephant in the room and the Democrats who want to play Healthcare are idiots if they think they can raise taxes and ignore Iran and win the White House. They are going to implode if they continue on their current tirade of dangerous silliness. This is not a time for domestic politicians it is a time for leaders who know how to engage very real enemies not with words but with overwhelming force.

The modern world can not afford the cost of barbarian regimes with nuclear weapons. This is not a game where playing nice is an option. This is a game that our enemies are playing for keeps and electing a woman in a pantsuit will not scare them into submission but instead most probably further strengthen their resolve.


18 posted on 11/16/2007 6:20:41 PM PST by Maelstorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mngran2
80 percent sounds like a big number.

If one Troop was AWOL last year, and two Troops went AWOL this year than that would be a 100 percent increase.

The percent BS has been used to manipulate opinions endlessly.

Usually it involves taxes.

19 posted on 11/16/2007 6:20:48 PM PST by Radix (If your outgo exceeds your income, your upkeep will be your downfall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mngran2

The military, like all organizations, has its bad ones. It’s also possible that some of these deserters signed up before 9/11, and were not expecting to actually be sent to a war.


20 posted on 11/16/2007 6:21:20 PM PST by Irish Rose (Will work for chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson