Posted on 11/11/2007 12:39:35 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican
I hate wasting this much press time on Ron Paul. But the Paul campaign is becoming a real threat to the Republican primary process and if allowed to continue, he will take votes away from the most conservative Republican candidates in the party, not the most liberal. This is bad for the party and the country.
(snip)
So, how Republican is Republican candidate Ron Paul?
If he’s funded largely by anti-war leftists, from Democrat stronghold districts and counting on Democrats, Libertarians and members of the Green Party to win the Republican nomination, not very…
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbull.com ...
Enjoy it while you can.
Yep, and look how well it worked out for Howie Dean (who, by the way, is a paragon of sound mental health compared to Paul).
Oh I plan too. May stay over and get tickets for the Blue Man Group as well...
Which is EXACTLY what the money is being used for.
Good point. Especially since they support the legalization of drugs. Yes. This is truly a selfish act by these teenagers and should be duly noted. lol.
Okay, that says all I need to know my friend. Never heard that one before. Just when I though bigotry couldn’t possibly be defined any broader....LOL
Of course they will be telling the moms that they have a school project and need more poster board and magic markers to make campaign signs.
Libertarians have always had their own constituency. Look at the consistent popularity of Ayn Rand’s work. It can’t just be a Democratic subterfuge campaign.
I’m not necessarily a Paul supporter, but I’m often surprised at the opposition to him on this site.
Aren’t the other GOP candidates jokers themselves?
Do you understand how powerful the IT department guys from Dean’s campaign, are now in the Democrat party?
David Weinberger and Joe Trippi are making it work, just for saner and wealthier and better paying Democrat and special interest campaigns.
I didn’t get that out of any of his public statements or campaign positions???
Neither did any of the leftists over at Code Pink or MoveOn who are supporting him because Hillary is stronger on the war on terror than Paul....
They will be shocked to hear this newsflash! LOL
All very true. The question is who will the Paul IT guys be working for in a few years?
Like you needed any motivation.... LOL
RP has the emotion vote, which means, he’s had you all along.
Don’t know...
I wonder how many of the same techies who supported Howard Dean in 2004 on a similar platform, using very similar internet tactics, are working for the RP campaign today?
Watching you guys is better than front row seats for the Chinese Acrobats...
Or midget lesbian wrestling ;’}
We have, and more. But nobody from the right is sending it to RP.
Spendocrat. Voted to override the pres's veto of the pork-bloated Water Resources Developemnt Act this past week. Voted for No Child Left Behind. Voted for the 2002 Farm Bill. Voted for Medicare Prescription Bill. Voted for 2005 Energy Bill.
I won’t support a liberal either and I never said you would. This entire discussion is not about conservatives supporting liberals. It’s about liberals supporting RP.
What’s your problem, besides reading and comprehension skills?
No, but nice try.
Your reply just points out the goofiness of your posting style. Someone shows you the simple solution to the problem you've been whining about for hours and you resort to trying to change the subject. Hoisted up by your own petard (words).
Take your own advice....
"Follow the facts first, then comment, Don’t kid yourself in such a childish manner, Have you had your eyes checked lately, mindless minion"?
Oh BTW, Did you "Learn that at your DU meeting, card carrying idiot"?
“They finally quit calling me for donations.”
Me too...
First, I agree with all Republicans more the any Democrat. However, like many Republicans, I am sick and tired of the lesser evil and would very much like to return the RNC to conservative principles and values.
I don’t see RP as conservative at all, just libertarian and isolationist in the style of a Pat Buchanan.
Of course, I don’t see Rudy McRomney as conservative either, or at least conservative enough.
That leaves only a few options. Thompson, Hunter, Tancredo, who else?
Of those remaining, Thompson has the best chance of winning IMO. I agree with his positions some 90+ %, as I do Hunter and Tancredo, which is as much as I have ever agreed with any national candidate. I didn’t agree with Reagan any more than that. I don’t agree with Huckabee any more than I do Rudy McRomney.
I voted for Bush twice agreeing only about 60%. Of course, like most conservatives who knew in advance what “compassionate conservative” meant, I actually voted against Gore and Kerry.
So if I had to vote today, I’d have to vote for Thompson. But I sure hope to see him do more to deserve that vote in the near future.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.