Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. Sex Offenders Go Homeless
AP via SFGate ^ | 10/31/7 | DON THOMPSON, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 10/31/2007 11:24:08 AM PDT by SmithL

Sacramento, Calif. (AP) -- Hundreds of California sex offenders who face tough new restrictions on where they can live are declaring themselves homeless — truthfully or not — and that's making it difficult for the state to track them.

Jessica's Law, approved by 70 percent of California voters a year ago, bars registered sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of a school or park where children gather. That leaves few places where offenders can live legally.

Some who have had trouble finding a place to live are avoiding re-arrest by reporting — falsely, in some cases — that they are homeless.

Experts say it is hard to monitor sex offenders when they lie about their address or are living day-to-day in cheap hotels, homeless shelters or on the street. It also means they may not be getting the treatment they need.

"We could potentially be making the world more dangerous rather than less dangerous," said therapist Gerry Blasingame, past chairman of the California Coalition on Sexual Offending.

Similar laws in Iowa and Florida have driven offenders underground or onto the streets.

"They drop off the registry because they don't want to admit living in a prohibited zone," said Corwin Ritchie, executive director of the association of Iowa prosecutors.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: California
KEYWORDS: calinitiatives; jessicaslaw; pedophiles; perverts; prop83; sexoffenders; sexregistry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Executing child molesters would solve a LOT of problems.
1 posted on 10/31/2007 11:24:09 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

They could have found most of them at the Cow Palace just a couple of nights ago....


2 posted on 10/31/2007 11:24:58 AM PDT by Badeye ('Ron Paul joined 88 Democrats.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Agreed. We're being accused of not being compassionate enough towards scum who prey on our children. What we should really be doing is making sure they can never re-offend again.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

3 posted on 10/31/2007 11:26:54 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Why don't they try just killing themselves and going to hell?

That would solve the problem nicely.

4 posted on 10/31/2007 11:32:35 AM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
Send them to NYC and they can get a drivers license and a new life.

Why couldn’t they claim to be an illegal alien with no ID and just pick a new name?

5 posted on 10/31/2007 11:37:58 AM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Set up bare-bones camps for them in the wilds of Alaska where they’ll be away from the temptation of children.


6 posted on 10/31/2007 11:46:22 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"We could potentially be making the world more dangerous rather than less dangerous," said therapist Gerry Blasingame, past chairman of the California Coalition on Sexual Offending

Actually, what they are doing is polluting other states with their filth.

7 posted on 10/31/2007 11:59:15 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; Dog Gone; Dark Wing
It's a pretty silly law, which makes it perfect for California. The City and County of San Francisco is so small (four miles across) that I doubt there is any part of it where people subject to this law can reside, but at the same time they'd violate their probation if they left the City. So merely breathing violates their probation.

The legislature here would repeal the law of gravity if you paid them to do it. I doubt this law will survive a federal constitutional challenge.

8 posted on 10/31/2007 12:11:38 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I wonder how they define a sex offender. Doe’s it include someone who slaps the wrong person’s butt and is slapped with a sexual assault conviction?


9 posted on 10/31/2007 12:16:16 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

bump


10 posted on 10/31/2007 12:18:19 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell

17 year-old boy takes a picture of his 15 year-old girlfriend’s naked breasts with his camera phone and emails it to a friend, who posts it on the internet. That makes both boys into internet pornographers and sex offenders, at the prosecutor’s discretion.


11 posted on 10/31/2007 12:23:43 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
Why couldn’t they claim to be an illegal alien with no ID and just pick a new name?

To get the illegal alien drivers license in New York you need to present a valid passport. You can't just claim to be someone else. I suspect there will be few illegal aliens that actually apply for the New York Driver's license. Spitzer is just putting on a show of helping illegal aliens, but the IDs are pretty much useless and can only be gotten if the illegal alien gets or has a passport from their home country.

12 posted on 10/31/2007 12:39:44 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Thud
It's a pretty silly law, which makes it perfect for California. The City and County of San Francisco is so small (four miles across) that I doubt there is any part of it where people subject to this law can reside, but at the same time they'd violate their probation if they left the City. So merely breathing violates their probation.

Yep. I voted against it for some of those same reasons. Unfortunately, even on FR, people started in with the mantra of "you must support sex offenders" when I said I opposed it.

13 posted on 10/31/2007 2:11:28 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

There’s a lot of land up by Alturas, and lots of it is nowhere near a school.


14 posted on 10/31/2007 6:19:07 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Global warming is to Revelations as the theory of evolution is to Genesis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud
20 something years ago when I was a $hit head juvenile delinquent I knew a kid who was convicted for some kind of sex crime and sent to a 30 day state evaluation on his character. His crime was that he grabbed some girls breast on a dare from his friends. The crime occurred in a crowded venue and was clearly meant to be an attention getter, not a sex crime. He was like 14 or 15. Is he a sex offender?
15 posted on 10/31/2007 9:08:39 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
Parolees can't leave the counties they are released in without the permission of their parole officer. It is a big hairy bureaucratic deal for a parolee to formally change his county of residence.

That is why paroled sex offenders in the tiny "City and County of San Francisco", all of four miles across, can't officially reside there yet can't move to Alturas, i.e., they violate their parole by breathing. And that's why this law is both bug-f**k nuts and federally unconstitutional.

16 posted on 11/01/2007 10:20:25 AM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BBell

Only if he is charged and convicted of a criminal sex offense. That is within the prosecutor’s discretion.


17 posted on 11/01/2007 10:21:35 AM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Thud
It's actually almost eight miles across (and the same north/south)...but your point is still valid. ;)

But hey, passing the law let a bunch of politicans hook their thumbs in their suspenders and brag to their constituents about how they were "tough on crime", so it served its real purpose...

18 posted on 11/01/2007 10:28:20 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Thud

I didn’t know that. Thanks for clarifying. Couldn’t they request to move, though?


19 posted on 11/01/2007 11:02:31 AM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Global warming is to Revelations as the theory of evolution is to Genesis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I have noticed a lot of these court rulings have put these sex offenders in Siberia..literally. The rules almost make them move out of the country.


20 posted on 11/01/2007 11:04:24 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache (No One Gets To Their Heaven Without A Fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson