Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Life Evangelicals Won't Vote for Pro-Abortion Candidate for President
Life News ^ | 10/19/07 | Steve Ertelt

Posted on 10/19/2007 12:59:10 PM PDT by wagglebee

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- A new CBS News poll has bad news for pro-abortion Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani. It shows that Americans who self-identify as evangelical voters are strongly pro-life and will not support a pro-abortion candidate for president.

The poll, released on Friday, find 79 percent of evangelical voters take one of three pro-life positions opposing abortion.

They either oppose all abortions, all abortions except those rare one to save the life of the mother, or support abortions only in the rare cases of rape, incest or to save the mother's life.

But the poll also asked, "Is it possible you would ever vote for a candidate who does not share your views on social issues like abortion."

Some 60 percent of self-described evangelical voters said no while just 29 percent said they would consider backing a pro-abortion candidate.

Americans in general take a 50-41 percentage point split with 41 percent saying they would not vote for someone with a contrasting view on abortion.

The CBS News poll also asked evangelical respondents "How important will social issues such as abortion be in your vote for president next year -- extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important?"

Among evangelicals, 74 percent said abortion was important to their vote with 42 percent saying abortion is extremely important and 32 percent saying it is very important.

Only 16 percent said abortion is somewhat important to their presidential vote and just 8 percent said abortion is not too important to them.

Among Americans in general of both parties, 45 percent said abortion is extremely or very important and 54 percent said it is somewhat or not too important.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; prolife; stoprudy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Just is case any of the Rooty Rooters are confused by this:
It means Rooty Toot CAN'T win.
1 posted on 10/19/2007 12:59:11 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 10/19/2007 12:59:33 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Stop Rudy Ping


3 posted on 10/19/2007 12:59:49 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; ..
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


4 posted on 10/19/2007 1:00:07 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Liz; calcowgirl; indylindy; 007girl; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; Sue Perkick

Even better news than the resignation of Mel Martinez!!


5 posted on 10/19/2007 1:00:28 PM PDT by TommyDale (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale; wagglebee; Reaganesque

But, will it stop Romney? I know some who have issues with his former stand on the subject...


6 posted on 10/19/2007 1:03:01 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Romney has taken an interesting tack. Rather than lying or obfuscating about past positions, he admits he was once wrong on the issue.


7 posted on 10/19/2007 1:11:07 PM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Mel Martinez resigns——good.

Pro-lifers WON’T VOTE for Rooty-—excellent.


8 posted on 10/19/2007 1:18:53 PM PDT by Liz (Rooty's not getting my guns or the name of my hairdresser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bobjam; Reaganesque

That’s probably the best thing to do. And, in all fairness, since he handled it that way I can see myself voting for him if he’s our candidate.

I grew up with parents who thought they were very progressive, with mom thinking NOW was the hottest thing going. So, I thought it wasn’t my right to tell another woman not to abort, regardless of my feeling that it’s wrong.

I am SO over that!


9 posted on 10/19/2007 1:21:21 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

DUH! We got a bunch of rocket scientist running the party.Hopefully this will konk ole rooooties campaign in the head.God knows common sense is hard to come by these days.


10 posted on 10/19/2007 1:22:05 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
"But, will it stop Romney? I know some who have issues with his former stand on the subject..."

As Rick Santorum just finished saying, "Let the record speak for itself." It will be entirely up to Romney to convince the pro-lifers that he is truly against abortion. I personally think he has straddled the fence on too many issues to convince them.

11 posted on 10/19/2007 1:22:33 PM PDT by TommyDale (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Pro-Life Evangelicals Won't Vote for Pro-Abortion Candidate for President

Neither will I. No Rudy Toot!

12 posted on 10/19/2007 1:23:27 PM PDT by TigersEye (Hillary can tap Hsus but she can't tuna fish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
It doesn’t matter. Rudy won’t get the nomination.
13 posted on 10/19/2007 1:27:46 PM PDT by isrul (Lamentations 5:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This is not rocket science.

I have my problems with Randy Terry, but I liked what he said about having Hillary elected if pro lifers don’t vote for pro abort Republican. He said something like, “So be it.”

If the pro abort New Yorker is nominated, they will not only have assured never losing the title of Stupid Party; they pretty much sign their own death warrant as a political force.


14 posted on 10/19/2007 1:31:31 PM PDT by don-o (Do the RIGHT thing. Become a monthly donor. End Freepathons forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“Pro-Life Evangelicals Won’t Vote for Pro-Abortion Candidate for President”

Good for them. They shouldn’t. I am sick of all the pragma”cons” with there “anybody but Hillary” scare tactics.


15 posted on 10/19/2007 2:09:40 PM PDT by Red Phillips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeInWV; 383rr; abishai; Afronaut; airborne; Alberta's Child; Antonious; azhenfud; B Knotts; ...

Ping!

Pay no attention.....we’ll all line-up like lemmings to stop Hillary.


16 posted on 10/19/2007 2:22:40 PM PDT by TitansAFC ("My 80% enemy is not my 20% friend" -- Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I have never known one person in my entire long life who was “pro” abortion. Never.


17 posted on 10/19/2007 2:26:44 PM PDT by FryingPan101 (Who will lead?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FryingPan101

You’re kidding right? I can give you names of present and former FReepers who think it’s just great.


18 posted on 10/19/2007 2:29:55 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Just in case.


19 posted on 10/19/2007 2:33:35 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Phillips

pragma”cons”
***interesting expression. Reminds me of UIN republicans, who will vote for anyone with an R in front of the name, regardless of what it means.


20 posted on 10/19/2007 2:35:23 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson