Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Life Evangelicals Won't Vote for Pro-Abortion Candidate for President
Life News ^ | 10/19/07 | Steve Ertelt

Posted on 10/19/2007 12:59:10 PM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: wagglebee

You’ll get your wish: a marxist as president.


41 posted on 10/19/2007 7:14:41 PM PDT by ought-six ("Give me liberty, or give me death!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“America survived eight years of the Clintons, we can survive a few more. However, I do not believe that the conservative movement can necessarily survive a liberal Republican president.”

No, we barely survived the most hick, redneck and pandering couple ever to occupy a house with 12 foot ceilings. They killed more American citizens than any administration in history, due to their fear of Christian extremists, while being attacked time and time again by OBL. Clinton would have lost if it hadn’t been for the 3rd party challenge of H. Ross Perot. Now you single-issue voters will hand it to a Clinton again

You must vote Republican, no matter who gets the nomination, fools.


42 posted on 10/19/2007 7:30:38 PM PDT by bukkdems (Muslims, not rednecks, marry first cousins. http://www.consang.net/index.php/Global_prevalence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: free_life

“Hunter is still my first choice. Why settle for anything else.”

Ditto!


43 posted on 10/19/2007 8:37:53 PM PDT by fetal heart beats by 21st day (Defending human life is not a federalist issue. It is the business of all of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: gidget7
Ahhhhhh so thinking government should have no role in what we eat, how much we weigh, or what legal products we buy, is now libertarian?? Not to mention thinking tax increases and more committees/agencies/councils, in other words growing government? Interesting concept. Not one I share however.

I'd prefer national food and drug standards, thank you anyway.

Huckabee wants to eliminate income tax, not increase it.

Duncan Hunter does not come across well, frankly. I suggest the late night viewing tonight, of Glen Beck's interview with Huckabee.

44 posted on 10/19/2007 9:22:49 PM PDT by unspun (We are still in the end times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: isrul
It doesn’t matter. Rudy won’t get the nomination.

Let's work to that end, my friend. Neither you nor I want to be saddled with a Rudy vs. Hillary dichotomy, i.e., an in-house liberal fight in which we all get screwed.
45 posted on 10/19/2007 10:04:53 PM PDT by Das Outsider (Ideas have consequences, actions have meaning, and words have power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: isrul
It doesn’t matter. Rudy won’t get the nomination.

Let's work to that end, my friend. Neither you nor I want to be saddled with a Rudy vs. Hillary dichotomy, i.e., an in-house liberal fight in which we all get screwed.
46 posted on 10/19/2007 10:05:52 PM PDT by Das Outsider (Ideas have consequences, actions have power, and words have meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FryingPan101

“I have never known one person in my entire long life who was “pro” abortion. Never.’

Of course you are...


47 posted on 10/19/2007 10:07:30 PM PDT by babygene (Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: unspun
Huckabee wants to eliminate income tax, not increase it.

He's been a big FairTax supporter. I'd like to think that a President Huckabee would sign the Fair Tax bill into law, eliminating income tax and corporate taxes altogether.
48 posted on 10/19/2007 10:08:49 PM PDT by Das Outsider (Ideas have consequences, actions have power, and words have meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: babygene

Excuse me?


49 posted on 10/20/2007 5:40:17 AM PDT by FryingPan101 (Who will lead?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I would really like to know who thinks “it’s great” to have an abortion aside from the likes of mindless wonders like Whoopi Goldberg. No one in their right mind believes abortion is “great.”


50 posted on 10/20/2007 5:43:47 AM PDT by FryingPan101 (Who will lead?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Help me out here, what exactly constitutes the "evangelical" Christian, and what overall pertcentage of GOP voters are they?

I saw this poll on one of the morning shows this morning, and they said that amoung non evangelical voters Rudy beats Fred by a huge margin, yet with the evangelical voters they were basically in a dead heat 22% to 23% with Rudy in the "lead".

So what denominations of Christianity are considered "evangelical"? Even this story says that people are "self describing themselves as Evangelical voters".

51 posted on 10/20/2007 5:52:29 AM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ought-six; Jim Robinson
You’ll get your wish: a marxist as president.

Let's get one thing straight, my wish IS NOT to have a Marxist as POTUS, YOUR'S is. You and all of the other Rooty Rooters do not seem to understand that there is NO DIFFERENCE between Rooty Toot and any of the 'Rat candidates.

The goal of conservatives is for the GOP to nominate a conservative. You and the other Rooty Rooters do not share that goal because you ARE NOT conservatives.

52 posted on 10/20/2007 8:50:53 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
You’ll get your wish: a marxist as president.

Which one?

I remember Rudy saying: "Most all of Clintons policies are exactly like mine"
53 posted on 10/20/2007 10:37:08 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bukkdems
You must vote Republican, no matter who gets the nomination, fools.

I will not be a 'good German' and vote for Rudy.

54 posted on 10/20/2007 10:50:29 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (No Covenant with Death: Giuliani Shall Not Pass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Pro-Life Evangelicals Won't Vote for Pro-Abortion Candidate for President

Nor will any true Catholic. To say "Pro-Life Catholic" would be a redundancy.

55 posted on 10/20/2007 12:24:56 PM PDT by Barnacle (Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle

Genuine Catholics and Evangelical Protestants are nearly in perfect agreement on matters of morality.


56 posted on 10/20/2007 12:32:14 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: bukkdems
You must vote Republican, no matter who gets the nomination, fools.

You can take that attitude and a flying fandango too.

What good is a party label if we allow the party to be led by people with the very policies we abhor? We'd then have two Leftist Parties. Where do Conservatives go then?

57 posted on 10/20/2007 12:33:32 PM PDT by Barnacle (Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Genuine Catholics and Evangelical Protestants are nearly in perfect agreement on matters of morality.

"Genuine" is the key word indeed.

58 posted on 10/20/2007 12:35:54 PM PDT by Barnacle (Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: FryingPan101

Get real, there are 3-4,000 more women every day that will never admit they made a bad decision, one that ended a human life... They are automatically in the “abortion is the greatest thing since chocolate glazed donuts” camp... as a form or self protection from reality (except for the ones that look for forgiveness).


59 posted on 10/20/2007 1:13:15 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

They’re just NOW figuring this out?


60 posted on 10/20/2007 7:43:50 PM PDT by Terriergal ("I am ashamed that women are so simple To offer war where they should kneel for peace," Shakespeare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson