"20%? What's a girl to do?"
Posted on 10/01/2007 12:30:15 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I agree about that other poll that was put up tonight. There were too many month to month jumps on it. Absent a scandal, the gradual movements shown on this one look more realistic.
At least we can agree that we want any one of the trio of Romney and Rudy and McCain knocked out of the first position.
Rasmussen tends to screen respondents more rigorously for the elusive “likely voter”. That is why they tend to differ(and are usually more accurate)
"20%? What's a girl to do?"
You’re welcome, I’m glad it’s helping.
Such early polls don’t mean a great deal. Still, it’s at least as usefull as a poll showingt Romney’s stock valued tripling in the blink of an eye.
It’s nice to see Romney starting to gain the traction that he deserves.
I don't see it... especially Giuliani. On guns, gays and illegals... this nut-case is a disaster. Voting for Romney, on the other hand, would be a gamble at best. So much of his campaign is based on how he feels now... and little about what he's actually accomplished as Governor(next-to-nothing).
Why McCain is even a blip on the radar is an anathema to me.
Thompson should win comfortably in SC... and pick up the Romney/McCain voters as the primary moves on.
They knew it was BS, but pretended to believe it. I was really surprised not one Romney supporter wanted to bet me Thompson would kick Romney's butt in SC. Romney supporters are as disingenuous as their candidate.
Rudy will have to be stopped in SC by a vote for Thompson if I were tactically voting against more liberal candidates.
I wish all the big names would go away and we could find a better candidate.
Well, like any typical 'female' when bad news hits ....
You Go Shopping!!
"Thank You Sir, I'll Take Three of These."
Sending Rudy/Romney into the south to defeat Fred is roughly equivalent to sending George B. McClellan and Ambrose Burnside to take care of Nathan Bedford Forrest. The result “won’t be pretty.”
The way Fred has been conducting his campaign recently, if he somehow manages to win the nomination then Hillary would win in a landslide.
Fred needs to sharpen and quit being so lazy, this is a Presidential election and not a election for a small town mayor.
The way Fred has been conducting his campaign recently, if he somehow manages to win the nomination then Hillary would likely win in a landslide.
Fred needs to sharpen and quit being so lazy, this is a Presidential election and not a election for a small town mayor.
Fred needs to sharpen and quit being so lazy, this is a Presidential election and not a election for a small town mayor.
My goodness you're kidding right!!!
ARG is consistently bullish on Romney... I'm not sure what in their methodology does that, but ARG results are generall out of line with everyone else for that reason.
Is there anyone here that's EVER been South of the Mason-Dixon line that thinks Rudy or Romney beats Fred in a Southern or border state?
I've been saying that the only states east of, and including, Texas and south of the Mason-Dixon line that aren't "slam dunks" for Thompson unless something goes badly wrong for him, are Virgina and Florida (I should probably add Maryland, too).
It’s nice to see Romney starting to gain the traction that he deserves.
Why does he “deserve” it?
The advance of Romney in this poll suggests the ARG poll was not completely absurd. There clearly has been an improvement in Romney’s numbers in SC, probably due to a media buy of whatever size. He may have visited there recently.
I will say that folks need to keep their minds wrapped around Iraq. Iraq is rapidly unfolding as a victory. The climate next year is going to be a great deal different than now with victory parades on TV. All the presumptions about loss of seats and Hillary’s inevitability will be undone.
It ALL DEPENDS on getting funding out of Congress. Unfortunately the Democrats are rapidly seeing the box they are in . . . that they have to vote to fund their own defeat.
If Iraq victory is funded, any of these GOP candidates will do well — assuming Thompson can stay healthy. I will remind everyone that winning states does not take all the delegates. Close contests . . . consistently close . . . does not generate delegate momentum. Romney winning Iowa and NH will generate a few delegates but not outright victory. Thompson winning SC by a few % will do the same thing, a handful of delegates with Guilliani and Romney picking up a few too.
The key state is unfolding to be Michigan. Michigan is huge. It is the replacement Electoral Votes for Ohio if the enormous Dem effort to take Ohio’s EVs is successful (and likely will be). Romney was born in Michigan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.