Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military shifting donations to Democrats (Paul leads GOP $99 zillion to $0. Resistance is futile).
Boston Globe ^ | September 13, 2007

Posted on 09/13/2007 9:35:35 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright

Military shifting donations to Democrats As the Iraq war drags on and US casualties mount, members of the military appear to be showing their discontent by donating more to Democrats, a campaign finance watchdog group said today.

Service members have traditionally supported the Republican Party, but there has been a dramatic shift since the war started in 2003 away from financial backing for GOP candidates for president and Congress, the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics said.

So far this year and in the 2004 election, about 40 percent of contributions from donors identifiable as military members has gone to Democrats, compared to about one fourth in the 2000 and 2002 cycles, the center's study said. Service members gave about $1.8 million in the 2004 cycle and about $330,000 this year, the study said.

Democrat Barack Obama, who is calling for a troop withdrawal to start immediately, has received the most of any presidential candidate from uniformed service members -- about $27,000.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bravosierra; donors; fundingtheleft; howtoirritatepeople; military; militaryvote; paul; ronpaul; saintronthedivine; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last

1 posted on 09/13/2007 9:35:37 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright; JTN; KDD; billbears; Abcdefg; jmeagan; George W. Bush; ...

PING

2 posted on 09/13/2007 9:36:54 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Coming soon: Stupidparty.com = Republican Party news, opinions, and blogs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

Something about this doesn’t pass the smell test.

So I say, “Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight......, sure thing.”


3 posted on 09/13/2007 9:38:08 AM PDT by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DreamsofPolycarp; The_Eaglet; Irontank; Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; ...

A this-oughta-be-fun ping.


4 posted on 09/13/2007 9:38:49 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nabber

LOL, because the Dims REALLY support our troops, (as victims).


5 posted on 09/13/2007 9:40:51 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

I’m not buying.


6 posted on 09/13/2007 9:40:59 AM PDT by pgkdan (Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush; lormand
Cue the Thorazine pic and FReeper lormand's terrorist pic!

"VOTE FOR RON PAUL YOU STUPID INFIDELS!"

7 posted on 09/13/2007 9:41:20 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Coming soon: Stupidparty.com = Republican Party news, opinions, and blogs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

When the military speaks, they generally speak very clearly.


8 posted on 09/13/2007 9:42:14 AM PDT by Logic n' Reason (Don't piss down my back and tell me it's rainin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I want to take this opportunity to frighten all the neos:

RON PAUL!

(It's like saying 'Denny Crane,' except it really works.)

[snerk!]

9 posted on 09/13/2007 9:42:53 AM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

Sure, the most anti-American cowards recieving the most from the most pro-American heros. I doubt it.


10 posted on 09/13/2007 9:43:49 AM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

If true, I think it falls under the heading of “shooting self in foot.” As if the ‘Rats give a rats’ as...terisk about the troops (except they like to use the wounded and dead for propaganda).


11 posted on 09/13/2007 9:43:53 AM PDT by MizSterious (Deport all the illegals to sanctuary cities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics

LOL!

12 posted on 09/13/2007 9:45:19 AM PDT by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

The study of donations is done by the Center for Responsive Politics.

Board of Directors (info from their website):

Paul Hoff: Attorney, Garvey, Schubert & Barer. Former Associate Chief Counsel, US Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs.

Sonia Jarvis: Visiting Professor of “Equality and Justice in America” in the School of Public Affairs at Baruch College- The City University of New York.

Charles Mathias: Retired Partner, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue. Former Republican US Senator from Maryland.

Ellen Miller: Executive Director, Sunlight Foundation. Served as CRP’s executive director from 1984-1996

John Murphy: Professor of Law, Georgetown University. Formerly served as the first general counsel of the Federal Election Commission.

Frank Reich: Attorney, Archer & Greiner, Princeton, New Jersey. Chairman, New Jersey Election Commission 1973-1979, FEC Commissioner 1979-1985.

Whitney Seymour Jr.: Attorney, Landy & Seymour. Former US Attorney for the Southern District of New York and Independent Counsel in the Michael Deaver case.

Robert Wienberger: Vice President for Government Relations, H&R Block.


13 posted on 09/13/2007 9:46:14 AM PDT by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics

Non-partisan? Baloney.

Many reporters have repeated the claims of one study in particular, from the liberal Center for Responsive Politics (which is regularly labeled "nonpartisan"), purporting to show that there is much more corporate money than labor money in politics. But these reporters haven't mentioned the study's serious flaws, which overstate corporate political contributions.

http://www.mediaresearch.org/realitycheck/1998/fax19980529.asp

14 posted on 09/13/2007 9:46:17 AM PDT by lowbridge ("We control this House, not the parliamentarians!” -Congressman Steny Hoyer (D))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
"has received the most of any presidential candidate from uniformed service members -- about $27,000."

With about 6 top contenders on either ticket, that means $162K at most. More likely, that is <$150K. Of which, Dems got 40%, or $60K.

The paper the article was printed on cost more.

15 posted on 09/13/2007 9:46:28 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (< Insert Mohammed Cartoon Here >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
So far this year and in the 2004 election, about 40 percent of contributions from donors identifiable as military members has gone to Democrats

Hmmmm....I wonder how many of these ‘military members’ are actually soldiers, and not just disgruntled family members (ala Cindy Sheehan).

16 posted on 09/13/2007 9:47:35 AM PDT by LoneStarGI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
I’m not buying.

Okay, but what if it's proven true. Comments?

17 posted on 09/13/2007 9:48:11 AM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

This is BS. Our troops do not support the party that say they are stupid and baby killers.

Only the Globe or the NY Slimes would print such utter crap! I still know many folks in service and they get more mad at Democrats every day. Most recently when the Dems called their commanding general in Iraq a liar.

What crap!!!!!!!!!!!


18 posted on 09/13/2007 9:48:24 AM PDT by CCGuy (USAF (Ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

Funding
“Support for the Center comes from a combination of foundation grants and individual contributions. The Center accepts no contributions from businesses or labor unions.”[2]

Major Funders

The Ford Foundation (currently under a three year grant of $1,000,000)
The Pew Charitable Trusts (currently under a two year grant of $550,000)
The Carnegie Corporation (currently under a three year grant of $450,000)
The Joyce Foundation (currently under a two-year grant of $350,000)


19 posted on 09/13/2007 9:49:52 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright

LOL< this is funny!! The Democrats call the military rapists, Nazi’s and murderers and they get REWARDED by cash donations.

The lib media will sink to any level to spread lies.


20 posted on 09/13/2007 9:50:22 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson