Skip to comments.
Oprah's Couch For Obama Only
The Washington Post ^
| 9/5/07
| Matthew Mosk
Posted on 09/06/2007 9:09:50 AM PDT by Texas2step
Oprah Winfrey may be getting behind Barack Obama's presidential campaign with vigor this year -- she'll raise $3 million for him when she holds a fundraiser at her California estate on Saturday.
It means she'll be wading into the political world as never before. In 2000, she had Al Gore and George Bush for guest appearances. And California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has dropped by her couch....
..........................................
This year, she says, Obama will be the lone presidential candidate to grace her studio. "If everybody knows I'm for Barack it would be really disingenuous of me to be sitting up there interviewing other people as though... pretending to be objective. So I won't be doing anybody because of that, on my show."
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; bias; democrats; elections; equaltime; obama; oprah; oprama; sheeple; tv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
A death blow to hillary...or not. ;-)
To: Texas2step
Actually this is realy good news.
2
posted on
09/06/2007 9:11:37 AM PDT
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: Texas2step
How much is an appearance worth?
3
posted on
09/06/2007 9:12:00 AM PDT
by
kenth
To: Texas2step
This is from the blog section of the Washington Post...I thought you might be interested in seeing what some of the readers comments were, as well...
One person who commented wrote: Oprah has done more for average Americans than any politician alive.
Millions of Americans will accept Oprah's recommendation because he has no reason to mislead or lie to Americans. She's not seeking any favors from Obama.
She tells it as it is. Her endorsement of Obama is as genuine as her words.
Kinda scary, if you ask me...
4
posted on
09/06/2007 9:13:01 AM PDT
by
Texas2step
(<><)
To: Texas2step
sorry, but what has Obama done to deserve to be president, other than having *some* black genes?
5
posted on
09/06/2007 9:13:17 AM PDT
by
RolandBurnam
(soylent brown is poop)
To: kenth
Him being black I am sure has nothing to do with it
6
posted on
09/06/2007 9:13:30 AM PDT
by
italianquaker
(Is there anything Ron Paul doesnt blame the USA for?)
To: Texas2step
Well, at least she’s being honest. Of course, this is a woman who repeatedly told her audience that “..the pursuit of happiness” was in the Constitution, so what does she know about government?
7
posted on
09/06/2007 9:14:15 AM PDT
by
soccermom
To: Texas2step
Her argument is phony. She had Bush on, and I don’t think anyone thought she’d be voting for Bush. No, she’s just being a racist; she’s only giving air time to the black candidate.
8
posted on
09/06/2007 9:14:23 AM PDT
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: Texas2step
More poster comments from the Post's blog:
the woman has great taste and knows a real president when she sees one.
If Oprah supports Obama, then l am for Obama. she has helped more people than any politicians l have seen. she has done more for peolpe all around the world and she is a woman of truth, brains, good values, genuinely cares for people and want to help and change the world for the better. so, if she says obama is the right person for the job, l believe her.
The sheeple speak...
9
posted on
09/06/2007 9:14:55 AM PDT
by
Texas2step
(<><)
To: Texas2step
Isn’t this an equal-time violation?
10
posted on
09/06/2007 9:15:29 AM PDT
by
lesser_satan
(FRED THOMPSON '08)
To: RolandBurnam
sorry, but what has Obama done to deserve to be president, other than having *some* black genes?
Well, if Oprah has endorsed him, he must be deserving.../sarc
To: Texas2step
"If everybody knows I'm for Barack it would be really disingenuous of me to be sitting up there interviewing other people as though... pretending to be objective."Actually, it sounds as though she doesn't want her pet fantasies blown. Well, at least she's honest. More honest than journalists are, and just as popular.
12
posted on
09/06/2007 9:16:15 AM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
To: Texas2step
I wonder what that WP reader thinks Oprah has ever done for her, or for the average American?
13
posted on
09/06/2007 9:16:25 AM PDT
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: Steve_Seattle
Her argument is phony. She had Bush on, and I dont think anyone thought shed be voting for Bush.
In 2000 she had both Pres. Bush and algore... and did not endorse anyone...
To: Texas2step
Oprah be actin’ so racist.
To: Texas2step
“If everybody knows I’m for Barack it would be really disingenuous of me to be sitting up there interviewing other people as though... pretending to be objective. So I won’t be doing anybody because of that, on my show.”
No more disingenuous then pretending your straight Oprah.....(chuckle)
16
posted on
09/06/2007 9:18:10 AM PDT
by
Badeye
(You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
To: lesser_satan
it is only an equal time violation when the libs get less time than the conservatives!
anybody who watches oprah has only 1/2 brain and is probably already voting liberal, so i don’t think the other candidates will be crying their hearts out (except maybe edwards...)
To: Texas2step
It’s simple. He’s black. She is black. She will support a black over anyone, ANYONE out there. No way she votes for anyone else but a black. End of discussion.
18
posted on
09/06/2007 9:19:19 AM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(The American Republic is slowing dying, and no one cares.)
To: lesser_satan
Isnt this an equal-time violation?
You would think so, wouldn't you...But, no, it's not, because Oprah is black and Obama is black, therefore, it's not an equal-time violation...kinda like racism, ya know.
To: soccermom
I don’t think she’s being honest at all. She had Bush and Gore on in 2000, and I don’t think anyone thought she was in Bush’s camp, or thought that it was “phony” of her to have Bush on and be civil with him. That’s what a TV host is supposed to do, be a genial host to people of different backgrounds and beliefs. If she has the Dalai Lama on, that doesn’t mean she has to pretend to be a Buddhist.
20
posted on
09/06/2007 9:21:26 AM PDT
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson