Posted on 08/30/2007 8:15:35 AM PDT by RoadKingSE
Global warming will make severe thunderstorms and tornadoes a more common feature of U.S. weather, NASA scientists said today.
Climate models have previously shown that Earth will see more heavy rainstorms as the atmosphere warms, but a new climate model developed by NASA researchers is the first to show the difference in strength between storms that occur over land and those over the ocean and how storms strengths will change in general.
The models don't directly simulate thunderstorms and lightning, but look for conditions that are ripe for severe storms to form.
The model was tested against current climate conditions and produced well known major global storm features, including the high levels of lightning seen over Africa and the Amazon basin and the near absence of lightning in ocean storms.
(Excerpt) Read more at livescience.com ...
Okay I'll concede that Tang was probably paid for with a Robert Byrd "earmark" to Kraft Foods. And I'm onboard with the support of mil apps.
However the Space Station is fast becoming Space Edsel. And I didn't leave anything on Mars the last time I was there. But it's Hansen and his Gorebal Warming idiots at NASA that really chap my @$$.
Okay I'll concede that Tang was probably paid for with a Robert Byrd "earmark" to Kraft Foods. And I'm onboard with the support of mil apps.
However the Space Station is fast becoming Space Edsel. And I didn't leave anything on Mars the last time I was there. But it's Hansen and his Gorebal Warming idiots at NASA that really chap my @$$.
Sorry for the double post. My mouse stuttered.
Hansen actually has overstepped his position. He ought to take his retirement and move to a Liberal university. What he has been doing is far from space program stuff anyway.
Some may have said this, but they are just alarmists. Tornados, and the thunderstorms that they result from, derive their energy from the average energy of the atmosphere. The average energy of the atmosphere is proportional to the absolute temperature, so any change will be according to the ratio of the 2 temperatures involved.
So for a 1o change,
Tfinal/Tinitial = 292/291 = 0.0034 = 0.34%
So, 0.34%/oC is all the extra energy available to do what they claim. That's not a significant increase at all, and it's flat out fraud to claim that it is.
You're telling me. (:^D)
I’m starting to think the people that wanted to abolish NASA and put the money into social programs may have had a better idea
/sarc
Future Headline: Scientists Say Fewer Hurricanes, T-Storms, Tornados Confirm Global Warming. (Omigod, We’re all gonna die.)
I can’t be sure, but by my own observations I think the nights are darker now than they were 20 years ago.
Id love to see a source for that..
I agree! What a waste of our money. How many times can they send that ridiculous Shuttle up just to watch newts breed in space? My husband said they ought to have a rolling money counter on the screen when they launch the thing to show how much it is costing us per second.
Funding time must be coming up again soon, because that is when NASA always releases another dire global warming prediction. It keeps the money flowing from Congress.
Tang.
What happened to The Coming Ice Age that was supposed to be happening according to news releases between 1976 and 1987? Could they have been wrong then??? Just wondered.
My intent was to point out that GW proponents use “weather” to support their conclusions but decry those who use weather to scuttle those very same conclusions.
Heh, you may be right! It will be interesting to watch, won’t it?
Also, a majority of the Supreme Court of Meteorology ruled that man made global warming is a fact. No more need for debate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.