Skip to comments.
Artificial Life Likely in 3 to 10 Years
Breitbart.com/Associated Press ^
| August 19, 2007
| SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer
Posted on 08/20/2007 9:23:32 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20
WASHINGTON (AP) - Around the world, a handful of scientists are trying to create life from scratch and they're getting closer. Experts expect an announcement within three to 10 years from someone in the now little-known field of "wet artificial life."
"It's going to be a big deal and everybody's going to know about it," said Mark Bedau, chief operating officer of ProtoLife of Venice, Italy, one of those in the race. "We're talking about a technology that could change our world in pretty fundamental waysin fact, in ways that are impossible to predict."
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: artificiallife; godcomplex; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
This I gotta see.
They might just as well quit, -- things like this just happen without intelligent somebody working on it. If you don't believe me, check out the Darwin worshipers.
To: Turret Gunner A20
The Democrats will be registering it to vote, I’m sure.
2
posted on
08/20/2007 9:26:34 AM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
("A person's a person no matter how small." -Dr. Seuss)
To: Turret Gunner A20
There is zero chance of success the way they are doing this. This opinion is based on scientific knowledge not some Gnostic heresy.
3
posted on
08/20/2007 9:26:36 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: Jeff Chandler
Too late!
The Dem’s long ago cornered the market on artificial life.
4
posted on
08/20/2007 9:27:22 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
To: Turret Gunner A20
Does anyone else wonder if this might be a bad idea?
5
posted on
08/20/2007 9:27:24 AM PDT
by
JamesP81
(Keep your friends close; keep your enemies at optimal engagement range)
To: Turret Gunner A20
I believe God has put certain “firewalls” on things and this may be one of them.
6
posted on
08/20/2007 9:28:24 AM PDT
by
stm
(Fred Thompson in 08! Return our country to the era of Reagan Conservatism now.)
To: Turret Gunner A20
Quick! Somebody give me an artificial immune system too!
I’m no Luddite, but this is seriously hazardous stuff.
To: Turret Gunner A20
It's already been done.
8
posted on
08/20/2007 9:30:12 AM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
To: G Larry
To: Turret Gunner A20
10
posted on
08/20/2007 9:30:38 AM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
To: RightWhale
“There is zero chance of success the way they are doing this. This opinion is based on scientific knowledge not some Gnostic heresy.”
I’m not well informed in this arena, but I’d be totally shocked if this were possible. It wouldn’t alter my beliefs, but it would surprise the heck out of me.
11
posted on
08/20/2007 9:31:33 AM PDT
by
brownsfan
(America has "jumped the shark")
To: scan59
One more ping and I’m done today.
12
posted on
08/20/2007 9:31:35 AM PDT
by
scan58
(Diversity results in a collection of unconnected individuals.)
To: Turret Gunner A20
Around the world, a handful of scientists are trying to create life from scratch and they're getting closer. If you've watched MTV for more than an hour any time during the last 15 years, you'd think these scientists already succeeded.
13
posted on
08/20/2007 9:31:46 AM PDT
by
Freedom_no_exceptions
(No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
To: Turret Gunner A20; DaveLoneRanger; wagglebee; Coleus
"We're talking about a technology that could change our world in pretty fundamental waysin fact, in ways that are impossible to predict." This statement makes no sense, but he is covering all the bases; no matter what happens, he can say he was right.
If it's impossible to predict, how does he know it's going to change our lives in fundamental ways?
And what good is the "science" if it can't make any definitive or useful predictions? You might as well guess.
14
posted on
08/20/2007 9:31:48 AM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: JamesP81
this might be a bad idea It's poorly conceived, will not achieve success in anything besides funding, and has been influenced by too many bad sci-fi movies.
15
posted on
08/20/2007 9:32:23 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: Turret Gunner A20
Does anyone know of private companies developing this technology? How about publicly traded companies?
I believe the next “big” technology breakthrough will involve the “programing” of bio-cells for computers and medicine. I want to invest in these companies before it’s too late. :o)
16
posted on
08/20/2007 9:32:43 AM PDT
by
Tenacious 1
(No to nitwit jesters with a predisposition of self importance and unqualified political opinions!)
To: JamesP81
Yes....they are playing a very dangerous game here, and for what?
17
posted on
08/20/2007 9:33:20 AM PDT
by
RC2
To: G Larry
The Dims have constructed an artificial reality environment too.
18
posted on
08/20/2007 9:35:20 AM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: Turret Gunner A20
I wonder if this work is being done by the Blue-eyed people?
19
posted on
08/20/2007 9:36:33 AM PDT
by
marvlus
To: rfp1234
From our State Fair during the last election...examine closely the mask they used to create Kerry.
20
posted on
08/20/2007 9:36:46 AM PDT
by
cj2a
(When you're pathetic, but you don't know you're pathetic, that's really pathetic.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson