To: Turret Gunner A20; DaveLoneRanger; wagglebee; Coleus
"We're talking about a technology that could change our world in pretty fundamental waysin fact, in ways that are impossible to predict." This statement makes no sense, but he is covering all the bases; no matter what happens, he can say he was right.
If it's impossible to predict, how does he know it's going to change our lives in fundamental ways?
And what good is the "science" if it can't make any definitive or useful predictions? You might as well guess.
14 posted on
08/20/2007 9:31:48 AM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
This statement makes no sense, but he is covering all the bases; no matter what happens, he can say he was right.He means that the changes will be big (a prediction he's willing to make), but that all kinds of unpredictable scientific and sociological things could follow.
And what good is the "science" if it can't make any definitive or useful predictions? You might as well guess.
This guy has plenty of ideas about what could result, and he could make predictions about that. He doesn't know the scope of the changes, other than that they will be grand.
29 posted on
08/20/2007 10:11:03 AM PDT by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
43 posted on
08/20/2007 1:41:09 PM PDT by
Coleus
(Pro Deo et Patria)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson