Skip to comments.
Author Tells U.S. Army He Made Up Stories Published in New Republic
FOXNews.com ^
| August 7, 2007
| By Michael Goldfarb
Posted on 08/07/2007 10:59:54 AM PDT by Squidpup
The Weekly Standard has learned from a military source close to the investigation that Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp -- author of the much-disputed "Shock Troops" article in the New Republic's July 23 issue as well as two previous "Baghdad Diarist" columns -- signed a sworn statement admitting that all three articles he published in the New Republic were exaggerations and falsehoods -- fabrications containing only "a smidgen of truth," in the words of our source.
Separately, we received this statement from Major Steven F. Lamb, the deputy Public Affairs Officer for Multi National Division-Baghdad:
"An investigation has been completed and the allegations made by PVT Beauchamp were found to be false. His platoon and company were interviewed and no one could substantiate the claims."
According to the military source, Beauchamp's recantation was volunteered on the first day of the military's investigation. So as Beauchamp was in Iraq signing an affidavit denying the truth of his stories, the New Republic was publishing a statement from him on its website on July 26, in which Beauchamp said, "I'm willing to stand by the entirety of my articles for the New Republic using my real name."
The magazine's editors admitted on Aug. 2 that one of the anecdotes Beauchamp stood by in its entirety -- meant to illustrate the "morally and emotionally distorting effects of war" -- took place (if at all) in Kuwait, before his tour of duty in Iraq began, and not, as he had claimed, in his mess hall in Iraq. That event was the public humiliation by Beauchamp and a comrade of a woman whose face had been "melted" by an IED.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: beauchamp; fakebutaccurate; fakenews; franklinfoer; hangemhigh; iraq; quislings; scottthomas; scottthomasbeauchamp; shocktroops; thenewrepublic; tnr; traitors; weeklystandard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
more "fake but accurate"
1
posted on
08/07/2007 10:59:59 AM PDT
by
Squidpup
To: Squidpup
— fabrications containing only “a smidgen of truth,” in the words of our source.
Truth: “I was in Iraq”
To: Squidpup
To: Squidpup
This kind of stuff happens all the time, and only rarely gets exposed. Left wingers by and large are all lying, deranged fabulists.
4
posted on
08/07/2007 11:04:25 AM PDT
by
jpl
(Dear Al Gore: it's 3:00 A.M., do you know where your drug addicted son is?)
To: Squidpup
The only way liberals can make a point is to lie.
Reality is their worst enemy.
To: Squidpup
The truth to the left is that which advances their goals. Factuality to them is irrelevant. It is the kind of fantasy world that can ignore Soviet Gulags and think that President Bush blew up the World Trade Towers.
6
posted on
08/07/2007 11:09:21 AM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(All Muslims are suspect.)
To: Squidpup
Did they have to torture him to get it out of him?
7
posted on
08/07/2007 11:14:54 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: jpl
UCMJ 907. ART. 107. FALSE STATEMENTS
Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent to deceive, signs any false record, return, regulation, order, or other official document, knowing it to be false, or makes any other false official statement knowing it to be false, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
If he was in uniform, stationed in Iraq, posting this rubbish and it was picked up by New Republic because his official position gives him credibility this might apply.
Of course so would aiding and abetting the enemy apply.
8
posted on
08/07/2007 11:15:52 AM PDT
by
dblshot
To: Squidpup
Has the New Republic responded to the truth yet? I guess they will just call it literary license.
9
posted on
08/07/2007 11:18:19 AM PDT
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: Squidpup
Why — WHY? — don’t we ever prosecute people for treason any more??
10
posted on
08/07/2007 11:19:28 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agammemnon dead.)
To: Squidpup
The lefties will say that he signed the confession under duress.
To: SirLinksalot
A poster at
HotAir posted the following:
Heres the thing, if he was lying, theres not much that he can be charged with. At most it would be some variant of an Article 92 violation for publication without permission or something similar (presuming such a prohibition existed within his command). At most, thatll get him 2 years if its a general order, more than likely itd be violation of an other lawful order which is 6 months max confinement.
Now some may argue that hes lying to investigators but he told TNR the truth. Problem there is that the penalties for a False Official Statement are far harsher (7 yrs and a dishonorable discharge). Lying to investigators is often worse than the misconduct itself. So even if Beauchamp IS lying, he sure cant ever say so while in uniform, as that subjects him to the more serious Article 107 charge.
12
posted on
08/07/2007 11:22:14 AM PDT
by
Republican Red
(The word "courage" is not in the liberal vocabulary)
To: ClearCase_guy
No one in charge has the cajones to follow it through.
13
posted on
08/07/2007 11:23:54 AM PDT
by
Vor Lady
(Through the gates of Hell, as we make our way toward Heaven....Primo Victoria!)
To: Squidpup
The Weekly Standard has learned from a military source close to the investigation that Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp -- author of the much-disputed "Shock Troops" article in the New Republic's July 23 issue as well as two previous "Baghdad Diarist" columns -- signed a sworn statement admitting that all three articles he published in the New Republic were exaggerations and falsehoods -- fabrications containing only "a smidgen of truth," in the words of our source. I hope this sinks The New Republic for good! First Stephen Glass and now this jagoff.
14
posted on
08/07/2007 11:58:32 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Squidpup
And just when the Weekly world News is going out of business!
Too much competition, I guess.
15
posted on
08/07/2007 12:15:37 PM PDT
by
TBP
To: jpl
This kind of stuff happens all the time, and only rarely gets exposed. Left wingers by and large are all lying, deranged fabulists.
Exactly. My first contact with it was in college. One of my friends was interested in a girl who worked on the school newspaper--a doctrinaire "liberated" woman type who was politically correct to a fault. She once wrote a column about a girl who was raped on campus but was too afraid to come out and file a police report because of how she would be treated. The column then went on to decry the anti-women atmosphere on campus and the column received a lot of attention.
My friend was a bit shaken by the column so he bugged the young lady about it incessantly until she finally admitted that there was no girl--she had made the whole thing up.
For all I know, that girl is working for AP or the NY Times today.
16
posted on
08/07/2007 12:25:20 PM PDT
by
Antoninus
(P!ss off a leftist wacko . . . have more kids.)
To: Antoninus
"My friend was a bit shaken by the column so he bugged the young lady about it incessantly until she finally admitted that there was no girl--she had made the whole thing up"
Yet another hoax by the left. But it "raises important issues" so it's OK. Don't the liberal activists who get burned by this ever turn on the reporters for playing with their emotions?
17
posted on
08/07/2007 1:00:43 PM PDT
by
boop
(Trunk Monkey. Is there anything he can't do?)
To: Squidpup
So... will the Private end up a copy writer for CBS? Or will the New York Slimes give him his own slot on the Editorial page?
18
posted on
08/07/2007 1:08:01 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: Dead Corpse
After Steven Glass - you’d think the lesson had been burned into every editor’s skull. Hard to believe it happened there twice...except that it’s too seductive for liberals to believe all the poop they spew about Conservative, President Bush, Republicans, etc. so they never apply even a smell test to these kinds of stories.
19
posted on
08/07/2007 3:50:38 PM PDT
by
Wally_Kalbacken
(Seldom right but never in doubt)
To: Trailerpark Badass
That is the way I argue with my liberals friends now. I have learned from them. Just make stuff up. Make up statistics, make up names of generals and congressmen.
20
posted on
08/07/2007 5:41:02 PM PDT
by
Holicheese
(Zap Razdowler Rules!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson