Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Squidpup

The lefties will say that he signed the confession under duress.


11 posted on 08/07/2007 11:19:31 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SirLinksalot
A poster at HotAir posted the following:

Here’s the thing, if he was lying, there’s not much that he can be charged with. At most it would be some variant of an Article 92 violation for publication without permission or something similar (presuming such a prohibition existed within his command). At most, that’ll get him 2 years if it’s a general order, more than likely it’d be violation of an “other lawful order” which is 6 months max confinement.

Now some may argue that he’s lying to investigators but he told TNR the truth. Problem there is that the penalties for a False Official Statement are far harsher (7 yrs and a dishonorable discharge). Lying to investigators is often worse than the misconduct itself. So even if Beauchamp IS lying, he sure can’t ever say so while in uniform, as that subjects him to the more serious Article 107 charge.

12 posted on 08/07/2007 11:22:14 AM PDT by Republican Red (The word "courage" is not in the liberal vocabulary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson