Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Ron Paul Cannot Be President
The LIberty Papers ^ | July 31, 2007 | Doug Mataconis

Posted on 07/31/2007 12:06:19 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

If Washington, D.C. were the drowsy southern town that Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge rode into, Ron Paul would have a chance. Washington’s not like that nowadays, though. It is a vast megalopolis, every nook and cranny stuffed with lobbyists, lawyers, and a hundred thousand species of tax-eater. The sleepy old boulevards of the 1920s are now shadowed between great glittering ziggurats of glass and marble, where millions of administrative assistants to the Department of Administrative Assistance toil away at sending memos to each other.

Few of these laborers in the vineyards of government do anything useful. (In my experience — I used to have to deal with them — few do anything much at all.) Some of what they do is actually harmful to the nation. On the whole, though, we have settled in with this system. We are used to it. It’s not going away, absent a revolution; and conservatives are — duh! — not, by temperament, revolutionaries.

Imagine, for example, President Ron II trying to push his bill to abolish the IRS through Congress. Congress! — whose members eat, drink, breathe and live for the wrinkles they can add to the tax code on behalf of their favored interest groups! Or imagine him trying to kick the U.N. parasites out of our country. Think of the howls of outrage on behalf of suffering humanity from all the lefty academics, MSM bleeding hearts, love-the-world flower children, Eleanor Roosevelt worshippers, and bureaucratic globalizers!

Ain’t gonna happen. It was, after all, a conservative who said that politics is the art of the possible. Ron Paul is not possible. His candidacy belongs to the realm of dreams, not practical politics. But, oh, what sweet dreams!


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: heisnuts; paulestinians; paulnuts; thevoicesinhishead
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 07/31/2007 12:06:20 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Those in the know, choose Sheriff Joe.


2 posted on 07/31/2007 12:09:34 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Because Paul doesn’t want to be the world’s sole superpower policeman?


3 posted on 07/31/2007 12:10:43 PM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

Better to be the world’s policeman than not. Name me one country you’d like to have doing this besides the US and the REASONS why?

And if you think that policing the world by a bunch of groups of states works, may I point you to the member-appointed (unelected), mainly socialist/fascist/dictatorial-ridden system called the United Nations?

They’re pretty friggin effective, no?


4 posted on 07/31/2007 12:17:38 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So he can’t be president cause the dregs of Washington would have to get real jobs? umK.


5 posted on 07/31/2007 12:20:58 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Cuz he is a Loserdopian. End of discussion.


6 posted on 07/31/2007 12:24:35 PM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Ain’t gonna happen. It was, after all, a conservative who said that politics is the art of the possible.

Who was it who said as soon as you think it's not possible, it isn't?

7 posted on 07/31/2007 12:24:38 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Other than the fact that is a complete friggin whack job, I see no reasons he couldn’t be POTUS.


8 posted on 07/31/2007 12:25:53 PM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

plus he’s a nut. That’s a major drawback also.


9 posted on 07/31/2007 12:26:52 PM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why Ron Paul Cannot Be President


10 posted on 07/31/2007 12:28:23 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Proudly keeping one iron boot on the necks of libertarian faux 'conservatives' since 1958!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Cuz he is a Loserdopian. End of discussion.

Not going to happen.

11 posted on 07/31/2007 12:32:15 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Jimmy Carter was President, and he is a mentally-unbalanced coward like Ron Paul.


12 posted on 07/31/2007 12:36:17 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

You are mean, just plain mean.

Why don’t you go pick on somebody you’re own percentage...


13 posted on 07/31/2007 12:37:47 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I am not really a Fred basher, I just play one on Free Republic. THOMPSON 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Think Pat. There, now you know why.


14 posted on 07/31/2007 12:39:08 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Happiness is a down sleeping bag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

1) Because he can’t win the Republican Nomination.
2) See #1.


15 posted on 07/31/2007 12:39:41 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Confidence in Congress has hit an all-time low of 14%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

LOL!


16 posted on 07/31/2007 12:40:33 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s 9-11, that’s why.


17 posted on 07/31/2007 12:41:18 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://ccgoporg.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The author is John Derbyshire from NRO, Doug Mataconis is the blogger who “borrowed” the excerpt. ;)


18 posted on 07/31/2007 12:42:57 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

Almost everybody’s got their favorite piece of the federal pork pie, and he’s going to piss off just about all of them over their piece.


19 posted on 07/31/2007 12:43:41 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Ron Paul is not possible.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

WHO?

20 posted on 07/31/2007 12:52:37 PM PDT by bikerMD (Beware, the light at the end of the tunnel may be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson