To: E. Pluribus Unum
Those in the know, choose Sheriff Joe.
2 posted on
07/31/2007 12:09:34 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Because Paul doesn’t want to be the world’s sole superpower policeman?
3 posted on
07/31/2007 12:10:43 PM PDT by
ex-snook
("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
So he can’t be president cause the dregs of Washington would have to get real jobs? umK.
5 posted on
07/31/2007 12:20:58 PM PDT by
CJ Wolf
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Cuz he is a Loserdopian. End of discussion.
6 posted on
07/31/2007 12:24:35 PM PDT by
VaBthang4
("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Ain’t gonna happen. It was, after all, a conservative who said that politics is the art of the possible.Who was it who said as soon as you think it's not possible, it isn't?
7 posted on
07/31/2007 12:24:38 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Other than the fact that is a complete friggin whack job, I see no reasons he couldn’t be POTUS.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
plus he’s a nut. That’s a major drawback also.
9 posted on
07/31/2007 12:26:52 PM PDT by
joebuck
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why Ron Paul Cannot Be President
10 posted on
07/31/2007 12:28:23 PM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Proudly keeping one iron boot on the necks of libertarian faux 'conservatives' since 1958!")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Jimmy Carter was President, and he is a mentally-unbalanced coward like Ron Paul.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Think Pat. There, now you know why.
14 posted on
07/31/2007 12:39:08 PM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Happiness is a down sleeping bag)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
1) Because he can’t win the Republican Nomination.
2) See #1.
15 posted on
07/31/2007 12:39:41 PM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Confidence in Congress has hit an all-time low of 14%)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
17 posted on
07/31/2007 12:41:18 PM PDT by
hocndoc
(http://ccgoporg.blogspot.com/)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The author is John Derbyshire from NRO, Doug Mataconis is the blogger who “borrowed” the excerpt. ;)
18 posted on
07/31/2007 12:42:57 PM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Ron Paul is not possible.
WHO?
20 posted on
07/31/2007 12:52:37 PM PDT by
bikerMD
(Beware, the light at the end of the tunnel may be a muzzle flash.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
conservatives are — duh! — not, by temperament, revolutionaries. Speak for yourself. Well, maybe counterrevolutionaries. The revolution is the state of affairs the article describes. So of a slo-mo overthrow of the Constitution.
21 posted on
07/31/2007 12:59:33 PM PDT by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I think this person is right. Ron Paul is unelectable. Given the remaining candidates, there will be no attempt to control spending for the forseeable future regardless of which party wins the Presidency.
The age of fiscal conservatives is over.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I know why: Because Ron Paul is a tin-foil hat wearing NUT-JOB.
Fred for PREZ in 08!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson