Posted on 06/29/2007 9:02:10 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
Clyde Friend is unearthing a 15-million-year-old forest at his property in central Washington. (Mike Siegel / The Seattle Times) April 26, 2007 |
|
Clyde Friend holds a section of a petrified tree limb found on his property. He's unearthing a forest that's more than 15 million years old. (Mike Siegel / The Seattle Times) April 26, 2007 |
Ping!
Cool!
His hands tell another great story.
Talk about an old-growth forest!
Naaaaaaaaaaahh. Couldn't happen....could it? Naaaaaaaaaaahh.
I suppose there is just no chance that these trees were buried more recently in a really big flood?
_________
From reading the article, your question above could surely be answered in the affirmative, if you intend to rewrite the Bible so that the rain that fell for 40 days and nights was actually lava.
Made of wood
Covered by lava while still standing
And they say that creationism stretches credibility!
Trees.
Made of wood
Covered by lava while still standing
- Yup - no ashes or cindering - in fact the picture shows bark on the out side of the hunk hes holding
Dem is shur sum heat pruf treez.
now you know they cannot PROVE it to be 15 million years right ?
Someone just found Algore’s ancestral home!
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
Covered by lava while still standing
And they say that creationism stretches credibility!
There are lots of different kinds flows that come from volcanoes. Some are hot. Some are cold. Some are heavy, some are light and fluffy.
Any Spotted Owls found yet?
I believe we must remember the “fire triangle” here when wondering “Why, if trees covered by lava, would they still have their bark?”
To have combustion, one must have 3 elements: A heat source (the lava), fuel (the bark) and oxygen (not present if the trees were covered quickly by the lava; the lack of oxygen is further shown by the presence of the wood itself, for if there was sufficient oxygen to consume the bark, the entire tree would’ve been consumed).
To deny that these trees are surrounded by lava would be to deny basic geological practices that can determine what kind of rock a rock is. Thus, we must conclude they were covered by a “flood of lava”, not a flood of water. The presence of the bark is inconsequential and fully explainable by the logic above.
Don’t get too excited, it looks like they were covered by ash and cinder to me.
Not yet but I'm sure someone is working on a reason why he must be stopped.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.