Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tony Snow: LIVE on Fox and Friends (Subject: Bush's Immigration Push)
FOX & Friends

Posted on 06/12/2007 3:22:43 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007

Tony Snow is about to appear live on FOX & Friends on FOX News. The subject is Bush's push for immigration "reform".


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; borders; bush; ice; illegalaliens; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; scaretactics; sellout; snowjob; snowman; vampirebill; whitewash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 821-825 next last
To: alwaysconservative
This issue transcends party lines. At the grass roots level, illegal immigration is as hated by Democrats as it is by Conservatives. That is why Congresses approval rating has sunk into the 20s. Working class, Democrat, blue collar workers are the ones losing their jobs to illegals.
241 posted on 06/12/2007 6:45:51 AM PDT by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: angkor
They'd have to learn English and American civics.
Read #216.
242 posted on 06/12/2007 6:49:34 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: TheShadows
I agree to an extent but if you are mom/pop buisness fined 140,000 for 2 illegals pedro and juan with passible english skills and what appears to proper ID , what the hell are you suppose to do?

Not hire Pedro and Juan? If Pedro and Juan have managed to fool mom and pop and have mastered good English skills, then it has already begun to work because Pedro and Juan are assimilating. Let's face facts, there are millions that can't speak a word of English that mom and pop know exactly what they are doing by hiring them and paying them under the table.

243 posted on 06/12/2007 6:51:35 AM PDT by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: mathluv
I agree to a point. Why is it up to the employers to enforce the law?

Employers have to do that now. When a person is employed they have give their social security number for tax purposes. Employers also have to verify that the person is of legal age to work in that state.

244 posted on 06/12/2007 6:51:47 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
I don’t believe that you will find more illegal aliens and reduce the problem by offering draconian solutions.

I see.

Do you believe that there is such a thing as a Z2 or a Z3 visa?

As for "draconian solutions", don't you dare put words in my mouth, or assert that I have said something that I didn't.

My "solution" to Amnesty is either (a) do nothing and retain the status quo rather than pass a bill which is destructive to America, and adds 15 to 50 million new permanent residents to our country; or (b) make the program conform to George Bush's temporary status of 2004, rather than the quasi-Permanent Residence status it is presently granted (to wit, "temporary worker" means "temporary worker", and not "permanent worker with a Z1 visa"):

"The legal status granted by this program will last three years and will be renewable -- but it will have an end... There must be strong workplace enforcement with tough penalties for anyone, for any employer violating these laws.... This program expects temporary workers to return permanently to their home countries after their period of work in the United States has expired.... I oppose amnesty, placing undocumented workers on the automatic path to citizenship. Granting amnesty encourages the violation of our laws, and perpetuates illegal immigration. America is a welcoming country, but citizenship must not be the automatic reward for violating the laws of America."

Jan. 7, 2004, President Bush Proposes New Temporary Worker Program
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/01/20040107-3.html

245 posted on 06/12/2007 6:52:15 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: anglian
Has to be done in by 24 hrs I think.

They have an excuse for that, it's to prevent applicants from being scared and not applying to "come out of the shadows" (literally what they say www.whitehouse.gov).

Regardless, there's no check on home country criminal records.

246 posted on 06/12/2007 6:54:51 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
If there’s no bill, as Sister Toldjah says, we may be stuck with one in the next Congress with less Republican representation.

You guys should really stop trying to parrot this line of defense.

The fact of the matter is that the next congress is free to do anything they want regarding immigration - what this congress passes doesn't matter.

In fact, the most likely course of events if this law should pass is that the next congress would eliminate all of the enforcement benchmarks and add to the "family unification" clauses.

Can we know agree that "pass it now or the next congress will do worse" argument is an fallacy and should be dropped from future discussion?

247 posted on 06/12/2007 6:56:01 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow; saveliberty

Most people call the illegals “criminals”. Crossing the border is only a misdemeanor, mostly paid for in fines, generally punishable by less than a year in jail. The real crime is the people hiring them and harboring them. That is a felony. That’s where the focus should be. The real criminals are the Americans! And of course ALL violent criminals, drug smuggling, etc. should be sent back without question. It will be very difficult to track any of them however without a bill registering all of them and documenting there where abouts.
What these people are being asked to pay is way more than most misdemeanors require. Calling this amnesty is just incorrect.


248 posted on 06/12/2007 6:56:32 AM PDT by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
They'd have to learn English and American civics.

It's in S.AMDT.1150 as part of first and second Z visa renewal.

I'm using the Republican version, can't find the "official" version of 1150 on thomas.loc.gov.

"Renewal. Z visa holders must prove continuing employment (if older than 16) (Section 601(m)), and if older than 18, take the naturalization exam (civics and English) at the first renewal. Before the second renewal, the Z visa holder must pass the exam."

However you are correct that anyone applying for N-400 naturalized citizenship must take and pass an English test (except those over 60 IIRC).

249 posted on 06/12/2007 7:01:25 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Tony sold his soul to be Bush’s mouthpiece.


250 posted on 06/12/2007 7:04:27 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
When a person is employed they have give their social security number for tax purposes. Employers also have to verify that the person is of legal age to work in that state.

If employers can't be blamed, then the guys issuing the phoney SS#s have to be made an example of. Make it a HIGH priority to catch the guys giving out these SS#s and put them on the news doing their perp walk to jail for 10 years.

251 posted on 06/12/2007 7:05:33 AM PDT by Russ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: jackv
It will be very difficult to track any of them however without a bill registering all of them and documenting there where abouts.
How is a bill going to track them when the bills passed in the past haven't tracked them?

What makes you think that any illegal alien will "register" so that they may be tracked to start with?! Are you counting on their good will and benevolent nature? If so, we would already know who and where they are!

252 posted on 06/12/2007 7:07:56 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
He skips the first part that gives the illegals status the moment the bill is signed, which means they can’t be deported, which is de facto amnesty.

Good point TomGuy. I've been trying to articulate that for weeks.

The moment it's signed, the concept of "illegal alien" no longer applies. They cannot be apprehended, and any formerly illegal alien appearing in immigration court cannot be prosecuted (the crime ceases to exist), and the judge must be offer Z visa status.

Rescinding a crime (illegal entry) for a class of offenders (illegal aliens) is the exact and precise LEGAL definition of "amnesty".

253 posted on 06/12/2007 7:09:55 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

The actual violent criminals will never register and will have to be apprehended.
Yes, I think many if not most “illegals” however would like to come out of the shadows, and stop being treated like monsters.


254 posted on 06/12/2007 7:12:21 AM PDT by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
Employees says, whoops, I made a mistake, here’s my new information. New name, new taxpayer ID and CA says that the employer has to take it.

Yeah, I'm sure legitimate people forget their name all the time. 

255 posted on 06/12/2007 7:12:44 AM PDT by zeugma (Don't Want illegal Alien Amnesty? Call 800-417-7666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: angkor
I'm using the Republican version, can't find the "official" version of 1150 on thomas.loc.gov.
Would you be so kind and post a link?
256 posted on 06/12/2007 7:15:27 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Do you consider paying a fine for any other misdemeanor offense a consequence?
$9000 and 10 years later is not fine enough or payment enough?


257 posted on 06/12/2007 7:16:12 AM PDT by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Exactly, the onus is then placed on the USG to prove why the illegal cannot stay in the US. It is amnesty no matter how you try to parse the definition.


258 posted on 06/12/2007 7:19:21 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: philman_36; backhoe
Our "border" with Cuba is "protected". That's because Cubans vote Republican. An open border with Mexico is a scam dems are using to pull the wool over yet another Bush's eyes. Bush will go down as the President who added 12 million poor angry democrats to the country - maybe 20 million...

Dems tricked the father - getting him to abandon his "no new taxes" pledge, and they're doing a similar scam on the son -- to legalize 12 million new Democrats.

Do Bush's ever tire of playing the fool for sneaky morally bankrupt democrats?

259 posted on 06/12/2007 7:19:39 AM PDT by GOPJ (We are NOT a nation of immigrants, we are a nation of Americans - legal, assimilated and proud-Laney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: jackv
Most people call the illegals “criminals”. Crossing the border is only a misdemeanor, mostly paid for in fines, generally punishable by less than a year in jail.

Criminals pay fines and criminals go to jail. That's why they are called criminals.

What these people are being asked to pay is way more than most misdemeanors require. Calling this amnesty is just incorrect.

With a stroke of a pen, they change from being "illegal" to being "legal." They are only "asked" to pay fines if they want to become citizens. If they don't pay the fine they are still "legal" and stay forever, for free. NO fines. NO penalties. NO deportation. NO jail.

Denying that it is amnesty is incorrect and insulting.

260 posted on 06/12/2007 7:20:03 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 821-825 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson