Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

But Her Heart Was Good (How many has Rachel Carson killed?)
Forbes.com ^ | 5/21/07 | Rich Karlgaard

Posted on 05/21/2007 7:25:01 PM PDT by gridlock

Rachel Carson wrote Silent Spring--the book that got mosquito-killer DDT banned and launched the modern environmental movement--while struggling with cancer. The disease killed Carson in 1964, two years after Silent Spring came out.

Today's Washington Post has a story on Carson--whose 100th birth anniversary occurs later this month--and her noble fight against cancer. A touching piece.

But maddening, too! Because in the story's 34 paragraphs, there are only a buried pair, the 26th and 27th, that note the ongoing controversy about DDT's ban.

A Maryland Congressman (evil Republican, of course ... wink, wink) is quoted as saying that malaria deaths might have been prevented had DDT not been banned.

That happens to be true. DDT kills mosquitoes, which carry malaria, which was all but eradicated before DDT was banned.

Buried in paragraph 27, and paraphrasing the Congressman, The Washington Post concedes that "numerous" deaths might have been prevented by DDT.

Let's stop here. Any curious reader would ask, Just how "numerous" is numerous? Wouldn't you ask that question? The Post never asks that question. Why?

Because the answer devastates Rachel Carson and her followers. According to these CDC figures, malaria kills more than 800,000 children under age five every year.

Every year, 800,000 small children die from malaria, a disease once nearly eradicated. Ponder that.

And all The Washington Post can say is "numerous?"

That's scandalous.

What do you think? Post your comments below.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: carson; cryptocommunitst; ddt; ddtistasty; ecofraud; envirotards; frauds; idrinkddt; malaria; silentspring
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
Another piece pointing out the obvious.

I saw a couple of Hollywood types making a very earnest pitch on a TV commercial yesteday to raise money to buy mosquito nets for Third World children to save them from malaria. I think the enviro-weenies are beginning to see the backlash coming and want to be seen doing something... anything... to look like they are getting out in front on this issue.

The fact that all this malaria is completely attributable to the non-sensical elimination of DDT completely escapes them.

1 posted on 05/21/2007 7:25:10 PM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gridlock

They were just trying to reduce the ecological footprint of Africans.


2 posted on 05/21/2007 7:28:07 PM PDT by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Absent from the Liberal mindset is the wisdom that the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.


3 posted on 05/21/2007 7:28:32 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY ((((Truth shall set you free))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Another typical liberal environmental boondoggle. Ever notice how things never improve after they convince everyone to do their bidding? The reason is, what we are forced to do to appease them has no effect on the non problems they wring their hands about. In this case, they truly did damage, but will never be held accountable.


4 posted on 05/21/2007 7:30:05 PM PDT by w1andsodidwe (Jimmy Carter allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

That’s liberals. But they always meeeeeeeean so well. And of course, as we all know, being a liberal means never having to say you’re sorry.


5 posted on 05/21/2007 7:31:43 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1andsodidwe

How many times in a row must environmental legislation have negative consequences before we can stop calling them “unintended”?


6 posted on 05/21/2007 7:32:14 PM PDT by gridlock (On January 20, 2009, Fred Dalton Thompson will be sworn in as President of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

But the liberals mean well and that’s all that really counts.


7 posted on 05/21/2007 7:33:12 PM PDT by mimaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

You would think that 800,000 dead kids a year would make an impression... but I guess not.

I have a sneaking suspicion that the fact that the vast majority of these children are African or Asian has a lot to do with the fact that your typical Liberal cannot manage to care.


8 posted on 05/21/2007 7:34:04 PM PDT by gridlock (On January 20, 2009, Fred Dalton Thompson will be sworn in as President of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
According to the Washington Post, there are "numerous" abortions every year too.

And they don't care, since most of them (by far) are just expendable brown people.





[spit]

9 posted on 05/21/2007 7:35:15 PM PDT by Petronski (Ron Paul will never be President of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
How many times in a row must environmental legislation have negative consequences before we can stop calling them “unintended”? I think I am going to promote that one to tag-line status...
10 posted on 05/21/2007 7:36:43 PM PDT by gridlock (How often must legislation have negative consequences before we can stop calling them unintended?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

(spit), Indeed!


11 posted on 05/21/2007 7:37:19 PM PDT by gridlock (How often must legislation have negative consequences before we can stop calling them unintended?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Shame on you all for looking at the actual results instead of at their intentions!


12 posted on 05/21/2007 7:37:34 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

But we eeeeeevil Republicans are the racists, don’tcha know...


13 posted on 05/21/2007 7:37:52 PM PDT by gridlock (How often must legislation have negative consequences before we can stop calling them unintended?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for 'our own good' will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."

-- C. S. Lewis

14 posted on 05/21/2007 7:39:05 PM PDT by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M203M4
C. S. Lewis is the Man!
15 posted on 05/21/2007 7:39:57 PM PDT by gridlock (How often must legislation have negative consequences before we can stop calling them unintended?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
According to these CDC figures, malaria kills more than 800,000 children under age five every year.

They would never say so openly, but the population controllers and the greenies probably think this is a good thing. Fewer third worlders to screw up the environment and increase global warming.

16 posted on 05/21/2007 7:41:38 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Shame on you all for looking at the actual results instead of at their intentions!

When people do the same thing over and over with the same result, over and over, one can be forgiven thinking that that same result is not what they were after, all along.

17 posted on 05/21/2007 7:42:44 PM PDT by gridlock (How often must legislation have negative consequences before we can stop calling them unintended?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.

This is not directly relevant to the topic of discussion here, but speaking of intention, why does intention play a major role in murder cases ? For example the penalty for murdering a spouse with the intention of collecting insurance is different from the penalty given for say rage killing--eg finding out that the spouse has been unfaithful. Is the penalty punishing the thought or the crime ? I don't know the answer.. I am just wondering.

18 posted on 05/21/2007 7:42:56 PM PDT by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Rachael Carson is responsible for an almost equal number of deaths as Communism..


19 posted on 05/21/2007 7:44:11 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Taz Struck By Lightning Faces Battery Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Fewer third worlders to screw up the environment and increase global warming.

Funny how Greenies always seem so happy to eliminate other people, but never get around to eliminating themselves.

Any committed Environmentalist who does not immediately go out and kill himself is a poseur...

20 posted on 05/21/2007 7:44:41 PM PDT by gridlock (How often must legislation have negative consequences before we can stop calling them unintended?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson