Skip to comments.
**THERE IS STILL NO BILL : (VIA) REDSTATE**
RedState.org ^
| 5/17/2007
| Erick from Redstate
Posted on 05/17/2007 11:07:29 PM PDT by Cyropaedia
Multiple Senate sources tell RedState that there is no actual immigration bill.
Contrary to earlier reports originating with Senator Kennedy, no bill presently exists and probably won't until tomorrow at the earliest. The lawyers are still behind closed doors putting it together.
Most troubling, Senate sources tell RedState that the bill probably will not be online in its final form until *after* the Senate has voted on it.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: amnesty; immigration; redstate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: NVDave
This is so depressing. I’ve read that Reid is a real master parliamentary style procedure. I guess that is how he got his job as Majority Leader.
21
posted on
05/18/2007 1:36:24 AM PDT
by
Cyropaedia
("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
To: Cyropaedia
May 18, 2007
Subject: Immigration
Dear Congresscritter,
This is absolutely shameless behavior. Just what part of illegal dont you folks in Washington understand?
Seal the borders. Enforce the law.
Sincerely,
OLA
22
posted on
05/18/2007 2:03:13 AM PDT
by
OneLoyalAmerican
(Truth was the first casualty in the MSM's war on President Bush.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
There is “The Right to Know”
23
posted on
05/18/2007 3:17:05 AM PDT
by
tiger-one
(The night has a thousand eyes)
To: VegasBaby
McCain has just written his own obituary in this race. I had almost convinced myself that I could begrudgingly vote for him if he got the nomination rather than face Hillary, but this is the last straw. Hes sold his soul on so many issues, but this was a blatant slap to law-abiding citizens. He sucks and I dont want that man anywhere near the White Houseeven if it means getting the Hildebeast. I almost agree...McCain is evil AND crazy, Hillary is just evil. I'm waiting for Fred Thompson to make a move.
To: tiger-one
>>There is The Right to Know<<
They are going to vote on this long before we could get anything from “Freedom of Information.”
To: VegasBaby
McCain has just written his own obituary in this race. No he hasn't. He's been dead for awhile now.
Didn't you see the debate Tuesday night?
26
posted on
05/18/2007 5:01:56 AM PDT
by
sauropod
("An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools." Ernest Hemingway)
To: NVDave; Carry_Okie
Those kind of tactics have been in place with congressional votes on wilderness for decades now.
27
posted on
05/18/2007 5:03:46 AM PDT
by
sauropod
("An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools." Ernest Hemingway)
To: NVDave
If you want to see how many of these UN treaties are passed in the Senate, youll see that the same tactics are used. Suspended rules, voice vote by acclamation, no roll call. Precisely. This goes back at least to the 40's.
28
posted on
05/18/2007 5:05:04 AM PDT
by
sauropod
("An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools." Ernest Hemingway)
To: VegasBaby
McCain has just written his own obituary in this race
I guess the 12 million votes he thinks he will get is more important then my vote, and yours!:-(((
We simply at the present time have no-one representing the conservatives in America.
Democrats will take all in 08
29
posted on
05/18/2007 5:06:37 AM PDT
by
buck61
To: Cyropaedia
The Enron guys got thrown in jail for doing things behind closed doors. We need Sarbanes-Oxley to apply to Congress.
30
posted on
05/18/2007 5:07:29 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: Paleo Conservative
I heard her throw in a line about needing to pass immigration reform legislationThey all say this.
The only possible answer is, "Why? Why do we need legislative reform? What's wrong with the current US Code, as amended? Why not simply enforce the laws you have already passed?"
31
posted on
05/18/2007 5:07:41 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(We don't need to know what Cho thought. We need to know what Librescu thought.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
The RTK does not necessarily fall into the FOIA
32
posted on
05/18/2007 5:20:18 AM PDT
by
tiger-one
(The night has a thousand eyes)
To: no_lectures_please
Anyone who contributes to GOP is a fool. With six years owning House Senate and WH, this is what we get.
May as well start down the 3rd party path, and build enough strength over time to play some solid defense against the RINO / Socialist coalition. At least one gets some return for the $$'s - vs. the likes of Hagel, McCain and the Vice President of Mexico, Jorge Bush
33
posted on
05/18/2007 5:24:40 AM PDT
by
Swanks
To: Cyropaedia
Senate sources tell RedState that the bill probably will not be online in its final form until *after* the Senate has voted on it.
Last session, they did similar. After Specter's committee voted to approve it, they added a few extra amendments at the last minute. Few, if any, Senators actually read the whole bill before they voted on it.
When it got to the House, several Reps actually read it. They didn't like what they found hidden in the fine print or buried deep in the 700+ page document.
FoxNews this morning said that Pelosi has warned the White House/Senate not to even send this monstrosity unless they could promise to deliver at least 70 GOP House votes.
34
posted on
05/18/2007 6:01:40 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: Moonman62
Nooooo!!!! Having spent several years auditing public companies, I’m convinced that Sarbanes Oxley has done nothing but create additional burden on the economy in terms of cost and productivity. We just need a politicians who realize that this amnesty deal is wrong (like DeMint, Hunter, Romney and Thompson) and are willing to shout it from the heavens.
To: VegasBaby
its still amnesty for people who willingly and blatanly broke the law
Guest commentation on a radio talkshow last evening said that, once this gets approved, illegals automatically get legal status because their status becomes 'pending'. So they get de facto amnesty immediately while they await for their status to be officially legalized.
36
posted on
05/18/2007 6:05:56 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
>>FoxNews this morning said that Pelosi has warned the White House/Senate not to even send this monstrosity unless they could promise to deliver at least 70 GOP House votes.<<
Because even some House Dems will vote against it, but more importantly, she fears a voter backlash in 2008, and wants to be able to say, “Look! The Republicans voted for it too!”
To: TomGuy
“...illegals automatically get legal status because their status becomes ‘pending’. So they get de facto amnesty immediately while they await for their status to be officially legalized.”
*shakes head*
So basically, screw the people who’ve properly waited their turn to apply legally in favor of people who, for all intents and purposes, gleefully flashed a middle finger to Uncle Sam as they traipsed across the border. Nice.
To: TomGuy
Which means that the OTHER amnesty in the bill is amnesty for businesses and corporations that have hired illegals.
39
posted on
05/18/2007 6:15:46 AM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: VegasBaby
I agree about SOX, but its implementation is evidence that W has returned us to being a government with a country instead of the other way around.
40
posted on
05/18/2007 6:23:35 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson