Posted on 05/15/2007 4:25:06 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
Republican Presidential Candidate Debate #2 – Columbia, South Carolina 05/15/07 - Official Discussion Thread
Watch live coverage of the First-in-the-South Republican Party Presidential Candidate debate on FOX News Channel and FOXNews.com on Tuesday, May 15, at 9 p.m. EDT (6 p.m. PDT).
It’s Griff Jenkins!
He said what he said. Your spin notwithstanding.
I see you did abandon your nonsense about me supporting Giuliani.
Bookmarking!
Sad.
Truly sad to see this man meltdown on live US TV.
He will lose the Republican primaries in his Texas Congressional district in 2008. A traitor like Ron Paul does not belong in the Republican party, there is another party that will welcome him.
hehe that was great lol
VERY good!
Actually it is mine, Do you support gun control?
That was a despicable display by FoxNews in ambushing Ron Paul with that question. However, FoxNews wasn’t half as disappointing as the response from the audience in completely missing the point.
America’s foreign policy has become one only shallowly considered and hastily implemented with an eye toward political expediency rather than sound doctrine. The questioner tried to insinuate that Ron Paul was implying that the US invited the 911 attack, which he wasn’t. However, what America has done is create a world where such an attack is more likely by failing to understand the ramifications of our foreign policy.
Back when the first Bush was in office we, through diplomatic ineptitude, failed to let Saddam know that an invasion of Kuwait was unacceptable. He invaded. We then failed to finish the job when we decided to overturn Saddam’s actions because it “looked bad” to see bodies littered on the highway to Baghdad. As a result of our politically correct decision of haste we were forced to stay in the region for a decade fighting a low grade war that eventually culminated in the second Iraqi war that we find ourselves in now. Had we, as Ron Paul suggests, either properly articulated a foreign policy or else fought a war to win instead of fighting a war for political correctness we wouldn’t have had this problem now.
The same shallowness of thought and concern for political correctness has resulted in the current mess in Iraq. We wring our hands over American casualties, Iraqi casualties, “innocent civilian” casualties, torture, etc… The harsh reality of war is that people die, usually a lot of people, and there are no such thing as innocent civilians, at least not if you want to win. Where do we think that the terrorists come from? They arise from the general population, are supported, protected, and funded by it, and as such the general population is as much a legitimate target as the front line fighters themselves. This position is terrible unpopular with the politically correct crowd, but it is the way we’ve fought every successful war (WWII, Philippine War, etc).
Ron Paul understands what the founding father’s understood; that we cannot go abroad seeking to slay dragons.
Text 36988
Hunter is r5
He's doing CO proud! Get some, Tom!
Hunter Wins the night!
I am going R9.
You don’t have to “fall” for anything. Your candidate, Ron Paul, sides with Bin laden.
Not a bad sum up.
1)Hunter
2)McCain
3)Guiliani
4)Brownback
Tancredo won
Hunter a close second.
If they are a licienced physician yank their license. If not then prosecute them for practicing without a license. The women are the victims. Let them sue in civil court.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.