Skip to comments.
Giuliani to NARAL- 65% Of GOP Want To Remove Pro-Life Plank
New York City Website ^
| 4/5/2001
Posted on 04/24/2007 6:49:03 PM PDT by Mr. Brightside
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-108 next last
To: editor-surveyor
I’ve already given notice I won’t vote for him. Rudybots can whine all they want, but I think I’m being fair in giving them notice that if they choose Rudy to be the republican nominee (because he’s the one that can defeat Hillary), they better take into account that many conservatives and Christians will not be voting from him, so they better make up our votes with liberals...something I see as unlikely.
61
posted on
04/24/2007 8:13:15 PM PDT
by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: Mr. Brightside; advance_copy
Rudy could not be more abortion unless he performed them with his own hands. It was Bloomberg who ordered all medical schools in New York City to have mandatory abortion training for all students becoming gynecologists and obstetricians.
To: Eagles6
Maybe they are “stuck on stupid”
63
posted on
04/24/2007 8:15:31 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! Or Rudy/Hillary if you want to murder conservatism)
To: Mr. Brightside
Any videos of Fred Thompson speaking to the NARAL crowd? Raising money for them? Praising Margret Sanger? I'm sure the Rudybots will produce a crude 8mm grainy film of some Thompson look-a-like walking out of an abortion clinic or something.
To: Eagles6
I’m not sure on the ‘vote’ He’s taken...
65
posted on
04/24/2007 8:17:39 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: Mr. Brightside
Rudy, please
Shut
The
&#*(
Up
66
posted on
04/24/2007 8:17:52 PM PDT
by
zendari
To: Ronin
Yup. A month ago I was a “rudybot”.
Now I know better.
67
posted on
04/24/2007 8:18:43 PM PDT
by
zendari
To: CindyDawg
I simply don’t believe him. But that’s not new. :)
68
posted on
04/24/2007 8:21:40 PM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(Better a democrat with an energized opposition than a leftist “Republican” with no opposition.)
To: Mr. Brightside
Already he’s attempting to destroy the conservative Republican plank. Can you imagine what he’ll do if he wins the nomination?
To: zendari
Unfortunately, Rudy has a BIG MOUTH and can’t help himself.
To: TAdams8591; Mr. Brightside; Spiff; narses; flashbunny; EternalVigilance
71
posted on
04/24/2007 8:36:09 PM PDT
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: advance_copy
Pro-life voters, believe me I know, will stay home before they vote for someone like this.
Put me in that camp. Not only will I not vote for him, I'll actively work for a 3rd party. Enough is enough.
72
posted on
04/24/2007 8:41:57 PM PDT
by
Antoninus
(I won't vote for a liberal, regardless of party....)
To: Mr. Brightside
Earth to rudy, you cant win the General missing 20 - 35% of republicans
73
posted on
04/24/2007 8:43:40 PM PDT
by
N3WBI3
(Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak....)
To: CindyDawg
To: tsowellfan
“Since April 2001 this nation has moved to the right.”
Do you have any stats to support that claim?
75
posted on
04/24/2007 8:59:07 PM PDT
by
Halgr
(Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
To: CindyDawg
Im proud to be part of the 35% me too~~~~ Polly
76
posted on
04/24/2007 9:06:16 PM PDT
by
pollywog
(Joshua 1:9 Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid,)
To: gonewt
It really is a hoot how some of you folks love to dig up stuff on Giuliani -- this is from 2001! Is there any evidence to suggest that Rudy's position may have changed since then?
Rudy should be given a chance to explain his earlier statements and say whether he still stands by them. I'm curious--do you honestly think he'd repudiate them?
77
posted on
04/24/2007 9:10:05 PM PDT
by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
To: CharacterCounts
If my choice is between a pig and a bitch, Ill sit this one out. If that's your choice, please vote for a third-party candidate. A race in which Clinton beats Giuliani 52% to 48% will be remembered as a race where pro-abortion candidates received 98% of the vote. A race in which Hillary Clinton gets 43% of the vote, Rudy Giuliani gets 30% of the vote, and pro-life 3rd party candidates get 25% of the vote (with a few percent to other third-party types) will be remembered as a race that should have been an easy win for the GOP if the GOP nominee hadn't been a pro-abortion extremist.
Bill
78
posted on
04/24/2007 9:10:49 PM PDT
by
WFTR
(Liberty isn't for cowards)
To: Antoninus
Me as well. I’ll work for the Constitution Party if I have to. Guiliani is dangerous. He would swing the GOP to the left if elected. He would be head of the GOP, and he would introduce some horribly liberal views. By the time he would be finished, conservativism would no longer be a part of the GOP. At least with Hillary in office, we know where we stand, and the next election we can bring the party back around to the right.
79
posted on
04/24/2007 9:21:11 PM PDT
by
Pinkbell
(Hunter/Thompson)
To: sageb1
I would possibly consider him on say, a Thompson/Giuliani ticket if it ensured a Republican in the WH. Given a choice between a Thompson/Giuliani ticket and the Democrats, I'd vote for the former but really hope Thompson could last out his term. Giuliani would most emphatically not be a positive.
80
posted on
04/24/2007 9:22:29 PM PDT
by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson