Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam secrets leading to 9/11
VIDEO ^ | 04 24 2007 | drzz

Posted on 04/24/2007 8:14:51 AM PDT by drzz

See the video linked.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 911; ansaralislam; aqiraq; bush; congress; dhimmicrats; electionpresident; firewall; hillary; iraq; iraqaq; pelosi; saddam; terror; terrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 04/24/2007 8:14:54 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: drzz

thanks for posting


2 posted on 04/24/2007 8:22:37 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rear view mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drzz

A Must View, simply Incredible!!!


3 posted on 04/24/2007 8:29:48 AM PDT by True Republican Patriot (God Bless America and The Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drzz

BUMP


4 posted on 04/24/2007 8:35:03 AM PDT by JerseyDvl (STOP - Hildabeast, Shrillary, Hitlery, Billary, Her Thighness, Sen. Cankles, Dukakis-in-Drag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

BTTT!!!!!!!!!!


5 posted on 04/24/2007 8:43:25 AM PDT by sweetiepiezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: drzz

Good catch. A lot of new items confirming Saddam’s role in facilitating 911. The evidence is pretty much there, just needs to be seen often. Jveritas and Drzz are doing good work on this.


6 posted on 04/24/2007 8:44:19 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: True Republican Patriot

Thank you.

It is always interesting to put researches in videos. The impact is gar higher.

About this subject, I think you begin to learn early that something is wrong with the new “official” version of the CIA about Saddam links with terror,

The fact they claim Saddam’s regime was secular is ridiculous. So why do they claim such things ?

Because when you want to bury a story, you begin to ruin the first link that could explain a relationship between Iraq and Al-Quaeda.

If Syria launched today a terrorist attack with Hezbullah againt Los Angeles, after Pelosi visited Damascus, the US establishment would act exactly the same way :

1) Syria cannot support Hezbullah, Syria is sunni, Huzbollah Shi’ah.

2) Syria cannot support Hezbullah, Syria is baathists, and baathism, in theory, is secular.

3) Syria cannot support Hezbullah, Assad fears the extremists and claim in public that he despises them.

4) Syria cannot support Hezbullah, the Hezbullah tries to create an islamic state that would erase Assad’s power from Syria.

BUT, as we all know, Syria DOES support Hezbullah, because they have the same enemy in common, because states always look for allies, especially the isolated states (as was Saddam). It is like saying the US could never have supported the communism during WWII because they didn’t share the same ideology.

This is ri-di-cu-lous. But that’s what the MSM, the 9/11 commission, the US government and the CIA say to the US people.

And because they say that, and because they keep trying to re-write history, I’m totally convinced Saddam’s regime is behind the 9-11 attacks, like he had been behind every major terrorist attacks since 1992 and the attempt to kill Bush 41.

WTC 93, African embassies, Saudi Arabia embassy, USS Cole...

They all have Saddam’s mark.


7 posted on 04/24/2007 8:47:31 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

Thank you.


8 posted on 04/24/2007 8:47:59 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: drzz

WOW!


9 posted on 04/24/2007 9:00:22 AM PDT by Leg Olam ("Somethings got to go, either me or that wallpaper.." last words, Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drzz

ping


10 posted on 04/24/2007 9:13:07 AM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drzz

ping


11 posted on 04/24/2007 9:18:28 AM PDT by N2Gems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drzz

self ping


12 posted on 04/24/2007 9:24:22 AM PDT by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

for those of us firewall bound, what does the video show?


13 posted on 04/24/2007 9:29:57 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: drzz
Democraps such as Carl Levin, Ted Kennedy, and the clinton degenerates wouldn't believe Saddam was involved in preparations for 9/11 even if video of the highjackers being trained at Salman Pak were shown to them. It doesn't fit their agenda, theri bushderangement syndrome mindset, thier empowerment scheme which workd to bring defeat so long as the Bush administration stands in the way of democrats controlling all the arms of gevernment.

The democrat leadership is the enmy within this nation and the people keep voting the bastards into office so the people have more lessons to endure, of death, mayhem, bloodshed, and murderers from Islam. If we do not get the message, we will continue to be slaughtered so long as the democrats can use the mayhem as an empowerment scheme for their political capital. If anyone doubts it, just look at the millions of alive unbron children the democrat party has been more than willing to sacrifice to the abortion holocaust inorder to empower their political party. They even defend the indefensible of partial birth infanticide murder because to allow the truth to seep out would endanger their empowerment scheme ... murdering alive children partially delivered fromt he womb has zero effect upon the dead souls of democrats who worship only thier empowerment.

Wake up, America, wake up Republican leadership ... the democrats want more of you murdered if it will empower democrat political schemes. They are exhibiting the madness of 'if we cannot be in charge then there does not deserve to be a country for others to govern.' Harry Reid says it plainly when he works for defeat; Pelosi says it plainly when she travels to the enemy's capitals and offers appeasement for terrorist supporters; the democrat loving media says it plainly when they criticize a subpreme court ruling upholding a ban on partial birth infanticide. Wake up America, or cease to be America when your beloved ghouls running the democrat party take final control.

14 posted on 04/24/2007 9:31:38 AM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2

That the CIA has been lying through their democrat loving teeth when they assert repeatedly that Saddam had no contact with Islam’s religious radicalism, and the video shows the links clearly, which links Saddam’s Iraq to 9/11.


15 posted on 04/24/2007 9:33:14 AM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2

a documented synopsis of Sadaam giving directives for european terror, disproves his ties w/ terrorists( he feed em ) and his secular stance and how he deceived all by adding words to the flag and making his eleite baathists memorize scripture


16 posted on 04/24/2007 9:33:53 AM PDT by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All

Some sources of the quotes of the video :

Robin Hayes : Saddam linked to 9/11
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/06/29/hayes.911/

Dick Cheney : “we don’t know if there is a connection”
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5233810/

Israeli’s Mossad : “strong grounds for Iraqi invovment in 911”
http://www.spiritoftruth.org/post_005.htm

US officials a week after 9/11 : “basis for signs of state sponsorship”
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/iraqS.htm

Al-Nasyriyah Iraqi paper, July 21 2001 : “bin laden’s argues convincingly that he will bomb the Pentagon and the White House”
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110003069

Saddam supported terrorism according to tapes
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-12986177,00.html

Laurie Mylroie
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13323

Other sources :
http://husseinandterror.com/

FReepers files : http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1154588/posts


17 posted on 04/24/2007 9:48:44 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: drzz

A former Defense and Finance Minister of post-invasion Iraq, Ali A. Allawi has completed and just released a book titled “The Occupation of Iraq: Winning the War, Losing the Peace” that talks about the inner workings of many things that took place in post-invasion Iraqi government.

Amir Taheri’s review of the book for Asharq al Alawsat reveals that Allawi’s points to some of the roots of today’s violence in Iraq going back over a decade to when Saddam Hussein used violent groups for his own domestic purposes.

One of the most interesting revelations in this book is Allawi’s account of the emergence of Arab Sunni radicalism in Iraq. He (Allawi) shows that the first Jihadi groups were patronized by Saddam to counter-balance Shi’ite influence from Iran. Saddam may not have entered into a formal alliance with Al Qaeda. However, as Allawi shows, he was in league with Al Qaeda-style Jihadis, such as Jund al-Islam (Army of Islam) and Ansar al-Islam (Victors of Islam), for a decade before he was toppled.
Kurdish officials have also testified that Ansar al Islam was also employed by Hussein’s regime to counter their leadership.

Allawi’s book is now available for order through Amazon.com and, based on the reviews, the book appears to be a fascinating read.

http://regimeofterror.com/archives/2007/04/former_iraqi_minister_says_hus/


18 posted on 04/24/2007 9:51:47 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All

For a regime long said to be sharply opposed to radical Islamic groups the secular Baath Party that formerly ruled Iraq has seen a conspicuously large number of its members caught in close collaboration with al Qaeda and other Islamic groups in post-invasion Iraq.

A recent arrest in Mosul identified a former Saddam Fedayeen leader as an insurgent leader responsible for al Qaeda/foreign fighter camps in Syria.

On March 23, the Tactical Report, an online Middle East intelligence service, reported that a former Saddam Hussein officer was appointed as an al Qaeda leader to set up attacks on Iraqi oil sites.

In addition to these “new converts” a number of older stories on the same topic were passed along to www.regimeofterror.com.

One story, from the Arabic newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat translated by a reader at Powerlineblog notes that one of the late Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s top men, Omar Hadid, was a former personal body guard of Saddam Hussein and had trained with al Qaeda in Afghanistan before fighting against coalition forces in Fallujah and elsewhere. Hadid, according to an al Qaeda biography after his death, also had a relative who was an official for Iraq’s Intelligence Services and worked with Hadid on postwar operations. It should also be noted that, according to Knight-Ridder news services, Hadid’s background included outright conflicts with Saddam Hussein’s regime though he testified to the country’s move away from secular restraints after the first Gulf War.

As previously detailed in a piece at The American Thinker by Ray Robison, the fighting in Fallujah a number of years back also saw the teaming up of many members of Saddam Hussein’s former Republican Guard and foreign and domestic jihadist fighters.

Reportedly there were “scores of men” like Abu Mustafa (who) was one former military officer who told TIME that he spent his time in jail (post-invasion) “studying Salafi Islam and receiving lessons in jihad from bearded Iraqis and detainees who came from places like Syria and Saudi Arabia” before joining the jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Abu Ali was “Among those who have thrown their support behind the jihad is insurgent leader Abu Ali. A ballistic-missile specialist in Saddam’s Fedayeen militia, he fought U.S. troops during the invasion and has served as a resistance commander ever since, organizing rocket attacks on the green zone, the headquarters of the U.S. administration in Baghdad. When interviewed by TIME last fall, he spoke of a vain hope that Saddam would return and re-establish a Baathist regime.” How Ali pictured a “secular” leader tolerating the type of violent Islamic extremism that Ali and others had helped spread in Iraq is quite a paradox.

One of the many anti coalition groups fighting in Iraq, called “Battalions of Islamic Holy War”,
whose leaders also met with TIME magazine, was “founded by frontline officers from Saddam’s intelligence services and the Republican Guard who once shunned terrorist attacks that killed innocent Iraqis” later represented a “significant Iraqi wing of al-Zarqawi’s network.” The Senate Intelligence Committee’s report in 2004 revealed some intelligence that predicted these sorts of relationships.

These additions add to an already sizeable list of ex-Baathists/Saddam loyalists who sided with Islamic/jihadist fighters and al Qaeda in Iraq. While it is certainly possible that many of these religious conversions and new relationships were initiated post-invasion, drawn together by the common enemy of U.S. led forces in Iraq, it is unlikely that the countless (likely hundreds) remnants of Hussein’s secular regime did not have at least some kind of a foundation for a relationship with these groups prior to March 2003. The type of trust and confidence necessary to give assets including money, weapons, arms, safehouses and training and reciprocal placement of Baathists into al Qaeda leadership positions only leads an outside observer to conclude that the two sides shared common grievances, common goals and common beliefs.

It has been 4 years since Operation Iraqi Freedom began and many of these relations that have been discovered post-invasion give cause for re-thinking prewar assumptions that secular Baathists wouldn’t cooperate with Islamic militant/terrorist groups, just as some in the government had predicted as being possible prior to invasion, contrasting the conventional wisdom of then and now.

http://regimeofterror.com/archives/2007/04/secular_baathistislamic_extrem/


19 posted on 04/24/2007 9:53:59 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: drzz

“Kurdish officials have also testified that Ansar al Islam was also employed by Hussein’s regime to counter their leadership.”

Ansar Al-Islam was created by fleeing Al-Quaeda members.


20 posted on 04/24/2007 9:55:17 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson