A Must View, simply Incredible!!!
Thank you.
It is always interesting to put researches in videos. The impact is gar higher.
About this subject, I think you begin to learn early that something is wrong with the new “official” version of the CIA about Saddam links with terror,
The fact they claim Saddam’s regime was secular is ridiculous. So why do they claim such things ?
Because when you want to bury a story, you begin to ruin the first link that could explain a relationship between Iraq and Al-Quaeda.
If Syria launched today a terrorist attack with Hezbullah againt Los Angeles, after Pelosi visited Damascus, the US establishment would act exactly the same way :
1) Syria cannot support Hezbullah, Syria is sunni, Huzbollah Shi’ah.
2) Syria cannot support Hezbullah, Syria is baathists, and baathism, in theory, is secular.
3) Syria cannot support Hezbullah, Assad fears the extremists and claim in public that he despises them.
4) Syria cannot support Hezbullah, the Hezbullah tries to create an islamic state that would erase Assad’s power from Syria.
BUT, as we all know, Syria DOES support Hezbullah, because they have the same enemy in common, because states always look for allies, especially the isolated states (as was Saddam). It is like saying the US could never have supported the communism during WWII because they didn’t share the same ideology.
This is ri-di-cu-lous. But that’s what the MSM, the 9/11 commission, the US government and the CIA say to the US people.
And because they say that, and because they keep trying to re-write history, I’m totally convinced Saddam’s regime is behind the 9-11 attacks, like he had been behind every major terrorist attacks since 1992 and the attempt to kill Bush 41.
WTC 93, African embassies, Saudi Arabia embassy, USS Cole...
They all have Saddam’s mark.