Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

[dynachrome]

“Good riddance to the POS.”
First time I have ever seen someone say they are prochoice on this forum. Saying it to Mr. R shows a complete lack of common sense.

[bjs1779]

He answers “Ronald Reagan”. Response: “The Actor!!!!....”...I forget the rest of the response, but it was something to do with who was VP.

Right! "Who is vice president?" Jerri Lewis?"

Do you remember that sign also? Something like "Ronald Reagan Insane Asylum".

[Dr.Zoidberg]

The jackasses over at DU and Daily Kos, ... are laughing their f’ing ass off at us.

And we should give a d@mn what they think ... WHY?

I'm not given to wasting my time caring about the opinions of marxists. No one who isn't of their mindset should care what they think.

All that matters is destroying them and their revolting perversions and by cleaning out the infiltrators and fifth columnists who spent days and days trying to tear down the very foundation of conservatism, Jim Robinson has done yeoman's work.

So screw the DUng Beetles and the Kos Kommies, their opinions are as empty and worthless as they themselves are.

[madprof98]

Telling the owner he prefers Hillary is laying out the case for your candidate?

It's the only "case" the Rudybots have been able to make since this whole madness started.

[mkjessup]

What? Not allowed to dance on a pro-aborts zot? Please feel free!

Oh well ok then!

'Can't touch this!' LOL

[Brad’s Gramma]

I'm not sure if mine could be called the best but it's probably a one of a kind.

It is absolutely perfect, Fiddl...

[Kevmo]

I remember a similar thing, but it was some guy named Petronski throwing up on MY desk. Hey, was that YOU? ;-)

[Eric Blair 2084]

Many of us are still chastised for daring to suggest that Terri shouldn’t have been murdered.

Totally off topic to the subject of the future of the Republican Party, but did you or anyone else ever see the South Park episode that came out a week after the Schiavo stuff?

[beltfed308]

First time I have ever seen someone say they are prochoice on this forum.

The rudy threads were full of these proclamations.

[Sam Hill]

“I also remember the time in third grade when I threw up all over my desk in school”

Undoubtedly it was one of your greater achievements.

[mkjessup]

What exectly is the end game? Somebody help me out. The jackasses over at DU and Daily Kos, who apparently were living in a cave while Karl Marx/Engels well intentioned egalitarian Communist experiment was failing in one country after another, are laughing their f’ing ass off at us.

Hey Eric?

Screw 'em if they take a joke.

[EternalVigilance]

did it ever?

Oh yeah.

[Mrs.Liberty]

bookmark

[Brad’s Gramma]

If you post a Supo here............

Oh MAN...what did I do now? *sigh*

[Jim Robinson]

"At that time, JimRob vowed he would lead an armed revolution if George W Bush was elected President."

That's a flat out lie and deliberate misrepresentation of my stated position.

My statement was in regards to a Peggy Nooman Op Ed piece published in the Wall Street Journal making light of presidential past peccadilloes and youthful dope using and saying basically that in these modern days, it's no big deal if presidential nominees have smoking dope or coke snorting in their backgrounds. After all, she implies, we (the collective we) all did it in our college days.

I blew up at basically told her and the WSJ through my post that that was B/S. If it's going to become normal for political parties, newspapers and pundits to push off on the people that it's perfectly ok and normal for their presidents to be dopers then it's time to consider the alternatives spelled out for us by Thomas Jefferson.

Too bad you're so stupid and full of hate for people who take conservative pro America, pro liberty positions (even if not fully inline with the GOP) that you can't understand the plainly written word.

[michigander]

That's a great reply.
However (you just knew that was coming, didn't you),
Many screen names have thought the sentiments contain therein were the case before and they paid the price of being banned for continuing to express those sentiments too strongly against many of the screen names that are being banned or just leaving of their own accord now.

[BykrBayb]

Yes, but not nearly as often. Some of the most offensive ones have been “euthanized” and buried at some obscure site. I wonder if they like it as much as they said they would.

[bjs1779]

Many of us are still chastised for daring to suggest that Terri shouldn’t have been murdered.

That's their problem. They need to straighten that out before they die.

[dynachrome]

“were full of these proclamations”
My take was that they did not come out and say so themselves but, that it wasn’t relevant somehow that rudy was very very pro-abortion.

[mkjessup]

Ooops...if they CAN’T take a joke! LOL

Oh well, you know what I meant!