Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.
One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.
All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.
FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?
Do you really expect me to do that?
Note the signup date, SY.
It will, indeed get better. It always does.
Whatever happened to Zeroisanumber?
Zotted!
My ad hominem attack?! Pay attention! The guy was just banned for saying Cheney was drunk when he had his hunting accident. My comment had nothing to do with who I support, unlike his attack on Cheney!
BTTT
Whose signup date?
JW’s. Already pinging folks, and has been on a total of three threads.
I'm not going to sit here and agree to disagree when I see a Rudy supporter slandering another conservative in order to bring the conservative down lower than Rudy.
I think the “ZeroformerlyknownasaNumber” wanted to be zotted, and that he got his wish.
Keep up the good work, Reagan Man.
So who do you think he is a re-tread of?
Hello my FRiend.
What a great thread. ;^) Woohoo
No idea, PM. I just think this eagerness to ban supporters (and other long-term FRiends of the forum, with apparent exhibited semantic relish) of one Republican candidate (on a 6000+ post thread) could, potentially, invite folks onto the forum who might not, possibly, be working for the objectives of the forum.
Just sayin’.
Salute to your service. You guys cover the sky and space, and the ‘Wolves will cover you down on terra firma.
And as far as those other arguments, I suggest several mass getogethers full of people, food, liquor and a little debauchery. That all seems a common theme either side of the aisle :-)
Again, Salute
I’m very well aware of which posts I responded to and conversly. It’s not hard to track back. I made a post to zeroisanumber and you answered it and took it from there. You could have opposed either your view or his, but didn’t.
You had how many chances to disagree? I even asked you if you disagreed with me. I even put it into the context you two were discussing. Maybe you just didn’t make your point. I can’t disagree with you because you haven’t said anything. You’re carrying on about banning and vitriol, etc.. Debate your point, or simply don’t answer someone elses post, would be something to consider.
Well, that account was started well before any of these bannings, so probably not a reaction, anyway.
But I think it smacks of a re-tread.
JW’s ?
Sorry. “Jedward’s”. Shorthand and all that.
what is a re-tread?
if the LORD found need to duplicate the flood, you and yours would get a seat in the ARK.
(sneak a satellite phone this time so we can find it after)
Ohhh...ok, you guys mistook a several year lurker for an old poster. Ok, I get it.
I assumed nothing, JW. Newer signups always invite a little extra scruitiny, that’s all. Carry on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.