Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

[DCPatriot]

I get within 40 posts of the end and all of sudden I’m buried again! LOL!

[gpapa]

The Republican party has already trended left on a number of issues including a wild spending Congress. That is one of the reasons, in addition to the war in Iraq, the pubbies lost control of Congress in 2006. If we do not elect a conservative President and Congress the bleeding will continue unabated.

[Kevmo]

bookmark. Only 1100 or so more posts to read to get through this entire thread. But then when I get through them, there will probably be a thousand more.

[dragnet2]

Too many have been voting for the lesser of two evils for a long time. It is time to stop this nonsense once and for all. If you wish to see more things like CFR, the gang of 12, big government, a culture of death, uncontrolled immigration, and further shredding of our Constitution be my guest. I will not be a party to such a travesty.

When its all done and said, this is what it's boiled down to.

It's time people pull their hands off their noses and take a big whiff of reality.

Surrendering conservative principles to fear is not an option.

[streetpreacher]

Are you an expert in anything other than bloviation?

Hey, at least you recognize your betters. It took me years to become this good, but don't worry, with more practice...

[skeeter]

Keep in mind that to the 'true conservative', as you call them, the insults are flying at least as thickly in our direction.

WHen you claim otherwise you lose credibility as an arbitor.

[68 grunt]

Yeah, I suppose I could turn the other cheek and let her accusations stand. Sure, yeah, go ahead and be identified with a group of people who have demonstrated the most bitterness and selfish sickness. Sure, that’d work for me. Not!

[Knitting A Conundrum]

But if we can’t get him through the campaign season, we surely will have lost, because the conservative party will probably let Hillary have a walk in.

Our real next job at hand is to be there to get a conservative nominated. If we can’t we can kiss a lot we cherish good bye for years to come.

[tkathy]

If conservatives want a conservative POTUS and a conservative government, they better get busy and come up with a compelling candidate, and quit blaming others.

[BykrBayb]

In fact, if you were called something that foul, I missed it

You "missed" it 15 times. But then, you can't consider it equally foul if it comes from a Rudybot.

[DCPatriot]

I hope we don’t have to pick between them.

[Spiff]

Great post!!!

[Knitting A Conundrum]

I know what you mean...

[denydenydeny]

Did you ever see the CareerBuilder.com commercials where you're the only human in a company that's been taken over by chimpanzees?

That's what it feels like around here lately.

[68 grunt]

I really don’t mind calling a liar a liar. Thanks for the concern.

[DCPatriot]

That’s pretty much true for me. If I have to, I will vote against the worse of two evils, but I will do what I can to keep it from coming to that point.

Exactly.

[fatima]

I already am:)

[Knitting A Conundrum]

Well said, Dita...

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism, RINOs, and El Gringo de Mexico en la Casa Blanca.

[68 grunt]

Leftists hate being outed

Yes, Roscoe, put it in a fortune cookie ...