Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.
One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to rule over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.
All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.
FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?
Do you really expect me to do that?
I will mail you, no this isn’t a joke. Far from it.
Things will seem clearer in the morning. ;^)
Ok, standing by.
Promise?
Given the ones out there, it's a clear sign of intelligence and moral responsibility not to have a candidate yet :-) I have my own fantasy candidate and he'd win against anyone out there. The problem is that he has no idea he's interested in politics, much less that he should run for the Republican candidacy :-) I haven't the heart to tell him, either. It might wreck his life. Probably would.
lol...no doubt.
(Removed name because it isn't important to my question)
Do people here think hotlinking is really an issue of law? I think I hot-link all the time, I just put an html piece in my comments referencing the location of a picture and sometimes it shows up, I use "img src=".
I'm not stealing anything, I'm linking a picture. If the owner of the picture doesn't want it to come to my site, they can make that happen. Any browser is allowed to go ask a site for a file, and if that site doesn't want to provide a file they can block it.
So, is it stealing to hotlink a picture, or not?
Hi EV
Jedward thinks that you lost your credibility when you admitted you were a lobbyist — he thinks a paid lobbyist shouldn’t be, well, posting like a regular freeper or something. Also the thing about giving slack because of race, but I think it’s mostly about the lobbyist thing.
Would you mind explaining that to Jedwards and the forum?
I’d like to bow out right here so I can go to bed.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435/posts?page=15579#15579
JimRob, I notice you were pinged earlier in the exchange so I’m pinging you as well. Please allow me to put in a plug for LOCKING THE THREAD. Well, let’s see how this plays out...
We do better staying on the outside and sniping. Any editorialist will tell you the same -- it's much more fun to be in the opposition, potting away at the incumbents. The scandal-a-day Clinton years were marvelous from that point of view. We had such fun here in FR :-)
He’s a troll. Plain and simple. Good night.
LOL...you may have a point, T’wit.
.......
The trolls twist stuff to meet their need to personally destroy me.
Not that it matters in the least, but I’m not that kind of “lobbyist,” ie one who works for clients to seek the advancement of their special financial interest with the government [like Fred Thompson was for decades?].
I’m a “lobbyist” because I run a tax reform organization, and if you want to try and influence legislation that has to do with taxation, the law says you have to register. I guess you could say that I lobby for the taxpayers of Idaho as a group. Our motto is, “It’s YOUR money!” Insidious, isn’t it?
Night.
One more thing: It shows the depths of depravity, and the weakness of my opponents’ abilities, that they think it necessary to delve into my personal life in order to attempt to practice the very Clintonian politics of personal destruction. They can’t win the debate, so they have to cheat.
Heavenly Father I pray that you would give Jim Robinson wisdom and our leaders as well, both republicans and democrats. Please show them the right way to go and to generate a solid conscience, keeping in their intentions what is good for America rather than selfish motives. Please heal Free Republic and our land. Take care of us, Father. In Your son’s name.
And you’re a Clown. Buh bye.
B U M P
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.