Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>Why do you want to vote for him.

I think your horse must've kicked you in the head.

You like Rudy, I don't. LOL

[conservative in nyc]

I beg to differ, she can’t support her charges, their just bullying and childish shrill Howlin type attacks. Her role model I guess...and our tactics don’t differ from the owner of the site.

Please point to one post where Jim Robinson told NautiNurse something like:

That’s crap. Shut up liar.

As far as my conservative credentials, I don’t have to justify myself to you you cookie baker.

[IrishRainy]

We’re watching you now, Steven. Don’t you think it’s time you threw the leftover lasagna in the blue tupperware out? It’s been 7 months, for crying out loud.

LOL!

[ansel12]

Cool!

[dukakis kerry the dream team]

“FReepers” were joining that anti-FReeper site more than a month before this thread started. How could that anti-FReeper site have been caused by a thread that was started more than a month later?

That is an excellant question.

[new cruelty]

Sorry, I’ll be more clear. I’ve seen many of your posts Lando. I know you’re a strong contributor to this site. dmw’s post gave me a chuckle.

[BykrBayb]

I’m thinking, time travel? Or maybe just liberal logic. I know, that’s an oxymoron. But those are my two best guesses.

[dmw]

I’m not the least bit worried. The fact that he is posting over there is irrelevant. What is relevant is, he’s written several posts to us admonishing us to tone things down, and yet he doens’t have the decency and fairness to tell his buddies over there where the anti-freepers are. Sorry, that’s unacceptable. If LL is a thoughtful poster as you claim him to be (and I never said he wasn’t), then he should do the right thing and post this same admonishment on WW as he did here. What’s so hard about that?

[1COUNTER-MORTER-68]

Go Get The Shovel Jedward !!! One Got Away !! NO!!! Don't Just SMACK IT !! In The CAN,Jedward !!!

[dukakis kerry the dream team]

Swarming again, rb.

[EternalVigilance]

Especially considering that Keyes is all but a forgotten name in politics

Then you have nothing to concern you.

[1COUNTER-MORTER-68]

;0)

[dukakis kerry the dream team]

Superman flew around the earth real fast?

[rbmillerjr]

Me: I beg to differ, she can’t support her charges, their just bullying and childish shrill Howlin type attacks. Her role model I guess...and our tactics don’t differ from the owner of the site.

You: “Please point to one post where Jim Robinson told NautiNurse something like:
That’s crap. Shut up liar.”

My response: First of all genius, I was talking about tactics fighting these liberal abortionists etc “in general”, so try some reading comprehension.

Me: “As far as my conservative credentials, I don’t have to justify myself to you you cookie baker.”

I stand by that.

[BykrBayb]

That’s it! There can be no other explanation.

[Lando Lincoln]

Sorry partner - as I said earlier - That's for meand the voting booth. I still have that right, don't I? But, I'll refrain from asking you any personal questions now also. Otherwise on all other matters, you got me. I'm guilty. I will never tread upon your hunting grounds. Little ol' Lando might get caught in the crossfire of the big boys.

But, I will tell you again, you have contributed the marginalization of this great forum. Good night. God bless you and yours. And, THAT, I sincerely mean.

[conservative in nyc]

“FReepers” were joining that anti-FReeper site more than a month before this thread started.

And FReepers were joining RedState. And FReepers were joining Powerline Blogs. And FReepers were joining Lucianne. And FReepers were posting on political-oriented blogs. And FReepers were joining forums about other interests (believe it or not!), too.

Does that make all of those websites "anti-FReeper" sites, too? What makes WideAwakes an anti-FReeper site or the new Clown Posse?

[jedward]

lol. My care for what someone has to say does have its limits.

[EternalVigilance]

“FReepers” were joining that anti-FReeper site more than a month before this thread started. How could that anti-FReeper site have been caused by a thread that was started more than a month later?

I'm sure the answers to that will be brilliant. /s

[Mojave]

“FReepers” were joining that anti-FReeper site more than a month before this thread started. How could that anti-FReeper site have been caused by a thread that was started more than a month later?

They wanted an echo chamber where their false and easily refuted talking points wouldn't be challenged.