Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson On WABC
Riehl World View ^ | March 12, 2007 | Dan Riehl

Posted on 03/16/2007 11:43:35 AM PDT by Josh Painter

Senator Fred Thompson did a brief call in to WABC radio's John Gambling Show this morning, clearly he is growing serious about making a bid for the presidency. Any grassroots conservatives listening in would have liked what they heard. It's being delivered by a candidate who could do his own commercial voice overs probably didn't hurt.

During the quick call Thompson emphasized a strong American economy and a strong military as necessary for America to meet her current challenges. While acknowledging mistakes in Iraq, he said he felt we are finally on the right track and that victory in Iraq must be assured. He is acquainted with General Patraeus as the General once commanded a base in Tennessee.

The former Senator went on to express serious concern over Russia for its relationship with Iran, while Putin appears to be slipping back into his old Soviet ways. Thompson pointed out that many Putin critics seem to have become accident prone of late.

Thompson also touched on immigration, stating the need for America to gain genuine control of her borders, suggesting that once that was accomplished, Americans would continue to embrace immigration as they always have, provided it's legal immigration and on a scale that fuels the economy, while not creating a potential disaster for social services.

He also mentioned the need to get a handle on entitlements like social security, which continue to move toward a fiscal meltdown while Washington refuses to act.

All in all, it was a quick, pure dose of basic Reagan conservatism. With many leading Republican presidential candidates weathering attacks on their credentials to carry the conservative banner in 2008, it will be interesting to see how Thompson's message resonates with the base going forward.

He would likely be a serious contender with the right financial support. As his television and movie image has genuinely been positive, that could help him with name recognition, while providing a bridge to voters who don't follow politics closely in between elections.

There is a long way to go until the next election. Much can happen and given the current level of political infighting among candidates on the Left and Right, it probably will.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election; fredthompson; nomination; republican; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Puddleglum

Yes - more so than Bush from what I have seen and heard.


41 posted on 03/16/2007 12:54:09 PM PDT by RockinRight ("After two years in Washington, I often long for the realism and sincerity of Hollywood." - FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Squidpup

Fred Thompson is a genuine conservative as far as I can see and he also has the Reaganesque ability to "go over the heads" of both the press and his political opponents by going firectly to the people. He believes what I believe and can effectively make the case so that goes far beyond being "electable".


42 posted on 03/16/2007 1:00:09 PM PDT by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

WOO HOO! Go, Fred .. RUN .. PLEASE!


43 posted on 03/16/2007 1:07:44 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
I'll readily admit he's probably the most electable conservative.....

Agreed. However, this election may be about winning, period.

I'm willing to sacrifice alot of things in order to prevent those who have died in Iraq to have died in vain.

We need to win.

44 posted on 03/16/2007 1:10:27 PM PDT by zarf (Her hair was of a dank yellow, and fell over her temples like sauerkraut......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
I'll readily admit he's probably the most electable conservative.....

Agreed. However, this election may be about winning, period.

I'm willing to sacrifice alot of things in order to prevent those who have died in Iraq to have died in vain.

We need to win.

45 posted on 03/16/2007 1:10:32 PM PDT by zarf (Her hair was of a dank yellow, and fell over her temples like sauerkraut......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JHBowden

My only concern about Fred is that he's been to one too many Hollywood parties...IF you know what I mean.


46 posted on 03/16/2007 1:12:07 PM PDT by Stand W (Fetchez La Vache!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Ditto. My check book will be open wide for Fred. First check I'll have written since 2004.


47 posted on 03/16/2007 1:14:52 PM PDT by NucSubs (Rudy Giuliani 2008! Our liberal democrat is better than yours!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Stand W

No .. what DO you mean?


48 posted on 03/16/2007 1:29:20 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: unkus; Howlin
Thank you. Will join.

I've added you to the Fred Thompson ping list. If you'd like to be removed, let me know.

49 posted on 03/16/2007 1:39:05 PM PDT by jellybean (FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT! Proud to be an Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jellybean

Thank you very much jellybean. Hope he announces soon.


50 posted on 03/16/2007 1:41:47 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Agreed. However, this election may be about winning, period. I'm willing to sacrifice alot of things in order to prevent those who have died in Iraq to have died in vain. We need to win.

I agree with you one hundred percent, particularly on the second line. Nothing is more important to me than honoring the sacrifices of my brothers.

Personally, though, I prefer to wait and see what things look like at primary time before I make the decision to abandon some principles and vote tactically.
51 posted on 03/16/2007 1:42:58 PM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country. Gingrich/Bolton '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

"WOO HOO! Go, Fred .. RUN .. PLEASE!"

I hope he does run! Just heard Michael Medved say that Fred Thompson is running! Wonder why he said that when Fred has not said so yet!


52 posted on 03/16/2007 1:43:00 PM PDT by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: zarf

Oh, and I should add that my main point was that when you compromise too much on principle to select a candidate on the basis that he is inoffensive to centrists and "moderates", you sometimes wind up nominating an empty suit like John Kerry. Playing not to lose is a good way not to win. I do not, however, believe Fred Thompson is an empty suit, and he may not be a "compromise" candidate, either.


53 posted on 03/16/2007 1:47:30 PM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country. Gingrich/Bolton '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: zarf
is he electable in the political environment today?

You tell us. In this crazy, depraved world we live in, who knows? Just do the best you can and pray for it to turn out right.
54 posted on 03/16/2007 1:47:46 PM PDT by no dems (Herman Cain for VEEP in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
I haven't donated a dime towards '08 so far, but if he announces, I grab the checkbook, even if I can only give a little.

I occupy the same position.

Up to now, the same old tired dogpack of Republican retreads has left me cold.

Indifferent, to be blunt.

Fred Thompson, I'd pound the pavement for.

55 posted on 03/16/2007 1:51:01 PM PDT by backhoe (Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard Pirate, pillagin’ his way across the WWW…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

Just heard Michael Medved say that Fred Thompson is running!


Really?!?! WOW- how did he verify that?

Run, Fred, RUN!!!!!!!


56 posted on 03/16/2007 1:56:10 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

That's just it, he really didn't! He was just naming the candidates and said "Fred Thompson is running."


57 posted on 03/16/2007 2:12:36 PM PDT by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: JHBowden
He is electable, good for the debate, and would be an honorable primary opponent.

Speaking of debates I can't wait to see him in the debates. He will wipe the floor with any of them, Dim or Republican doesn't matter.

58 posted on 03/16/2007 2:56:37 PM PDT by barker ( A smile is a curved line that sets things straight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan
That's the difference between Bush and a Reagan conservative.

Bush cannot be compared to a Reagan conservative. Don't even try. Apples and oranges.

59 posted on 03/16/2007 3:09:12 PM PDT by America_Right (Fred Thompson - The closest thing to Reagan we are likely to get!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: America_Right

For all of those have not passed their ESL courses, Bush cannot be compared to a Reagan conservative.


60 posted on 03/16/2007 3:25:29 PM PDT by A. Morgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson