Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intelligent Design Scientists Will Showcase Evidence Challenging Evolution
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=3916&program=DI%20Main%20Page%20-%20News&callingPage=discoMainPage ^

Posted on 03/13/2007 12:35:30 PM PDT by truthfinder9

Intelligent Design Scientists Will Showcase Evidence Challenging Evolution at Knoxville Conference

KNOXVILLE – What is intelligent design and what scientific evidence supports it? Why is it so controversial? How does it differ from Darwin’s theory of evolution? Is there a purpose to the universe? What new scientific facts are turning evolutionary theories upside down? This one-day conference will answer these and other intriguing questions.

The emerging scientific theory of intelligent design is a hot topic at universities and research institutions around the world, and is now the focus of a day-long conference called Darwin vs. Design, coming to the Knoxville Convention Center on March 24th.

Join The New York Times bestselling author Lee Strobel and a panel of scientists and experts at the Darwin vs. Design Conference as they explain the evidence for Darwin’s theory of evolution and the emerging scientific theory of intelligent design Saturday, March 24th.

Featured speakers include:
-Lee Strobel, journalist and bestselling author of The Case for a Creator.
-Dr. Stephen Meyer, Director, Center for Science and Culture (CSC) at Discovery Institute, and co-editor of Darwinism, Design, and Public Education
-Dr. Michael Behe, Lehigh University biochemist and author of the bestselling book Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, and CSC senior fellow
-Dr. Jay Richards, co-author of The Privileged Planet, and CSC senior fellow

Attendees will interact with intelligent design scientists and philosophers whose discoveries in cosmology, biology, physics, and DNA present astonishing scientific evidence that is overturning the evolutionary thinking of the past. Conference goers will hear firsthand the astounding implications these discoveries are having on our society, our politics and our culture.

The conference is $55 for General Admission and $5 for Students and teachers (with valid school ID at time of admission). Advance purchase group rates are also available by contacting conferences@discovery.org. Purchase tickets online at www.ticketweb.com (use key word Darwin). For more information visit our website at www.darwinvsdesign.com.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: apologetics; cranksswindlesuckers; creationism; creationmyths; darwinismsnotscience; design; evolution; evolutionmyths; fsmdidit; idjunkscience; naturalism; science; youcantfixstupid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-392 next last
To: fish hawk
Isn't it ironic how the left always spews that there can't be science involved in Creationism but push science in Evolutionism, which is basically a theory, philosophy, with no more proof than Creationism, and demands the same amount of "faith".

What amazes me is how similar evolutionists and Socialists really are. Both want to be able to define their own narrow set of "facts" as the "only" truth, and then rule everything else out of bounds. Likewise, both groups rely on "facts" which, if freely discussed, would probably be rejected by the majority of thinking people. In many ways, your average Darwinist is like your average Social Democrat.

41 posted on 03/13/2007 1:53:48 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: doc30
What was that saying about a fool and his money?

They were lucky to get together in the first place?

42 posted on 03/13/2007 1:54:11 PM PDT by Dinsdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Who needs arguments when you can call people names? I'm amazed you haven't compared "evilutionists" to Hitler yet.

Please ping me if you do.

43 posted on 03/13/2007 1:55:33 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs
I think the anti-ID crowd would do itself a favor (and I am generally on it's side) if it realized that not all Christians who believe in ID reject evolution, geology, plate tectonics, archeology, astronomy, physics, and all the other sciences involved in proving that the earth is NOT 15,000 years old.

In other words, there are people of Christian faith who believe in God but also accept the reality of science.

So try not to alienate those of faith who are on your side. :-)

The problem is the people who believe ID as a scientific concept, and not a philosophical one. As a science, ID is noncorporeal.

44 posted on 03/13/2007 1:57:49 PM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs
In other words, there are people of Christian faith who believe in God but also accept the reality of science.

What's funny is this whole type of discussion is that creationists aren't even "rejecting science", they are rejecting bad science passed off as received truth - something that evolutionists argue that religion does.

Let's face it - there are quite a number of conceptual and evidential reasons to question just about every tenet of evolutionary theory. Some of these reasons might end up being good reasons, and some might not. The problem is not the invalidity of arguments made by creationists (well, except for that whole "geocentricity" thing). The problem is that evolutionists point-blank refuse to allow their theory to be challenged scientifically. To "prove" their theory, they come up with any number of circularly-reasoned arguments based off of their own theories that they then USE to suggest that they've proven their theories. When someone DOES challenge, instead of responding like the mature adults that degrees in science might suggest them to be, they instead act like spoiled five-year olds who are told that Santa Claus doesn't exist.

45 posted on 03/13/2007 2:01:12 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
What amazes me is how similar evolutionists and Socialists really are.

What amazes me is how creationists can claim that the theory of evolution is responsible for everything from socialism to capitalism to dandruff.

"Evolution provides the scientific orthodoxy for the philosophies of Marxism, fascism, racism, apartheid and unbridled capitalism."
See Answers in Genesis
46 posted on 03/13/2007 2:11:43 PM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: truthfinder9
"....as they explain the evidence for Darwin’s theory of evolution and the emerging scientific theory of intelligent design Saturday, March 24th."

Evolution is a theory, ID is merely a hypothesis

47 posted on 03/13/2007 2:12:17 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

I must concur.

Nevertheless, remember you have allies in many people of faith. The official positions of the bulk of Christendom believe in God AND an old earth.


48 posted on 03/13/2007 2:13:15 PM PDT by NucSubs (That's so gay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
The problem is that evolutionists point-blank refuse to allow their theory to be challenged scientifically. But that is a false argument IMO. Because it is not "evolutionists" you must debate if you are a YE creationist. It's geologists, astronomers, paleontologists, a whole SLEW of scientific disciplines. To focus on evolution alone is a canard in my opinion.
49 posted on 03/13/2007 2:15:47 PM PDT by NucSubs (That's so gay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs

Sorry NucSub, I am using "evolution" in the broad-based sense that includes all of those areas, not just biological evolution.


50 posted on 03/13/2007 2:18:03 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: doc30
As a science, ID is noncorporeal.

There’s a brain-stretcher. ID is noncoporeal. In other words, this idea doesn’t have a physical body.

Whod’a thunk?

51 posted on 03/13/2007 2:26:13 PM PDT by Scourge of God (Remember, liberals, 'baaa' means NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: doc30
As a science, ID is noncorporeal.

There’s a brain-stretcher. ID is noncoporeal. In other words, this idea doesn’t have a physical body.

Whod’a thunk?

52 posted on 03/13/2007 2:26:25 PM PDT by Scourge of God (Remember, liberals, 'baaa' means NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Here's the Meyer's article.

There are 8 pages of citations of scientists and the publications where they appeared. Meyers points out how peer-reviewed scientists have completely failed, using Neo-Darwinian theories, to account for the complexity of living organisms.

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=549

I take it your OK with harassment of those with different views considering your statements on these crevo threads.

It is only a matter of time before the entire Darwinian fraud comes crashing down. Attempts to silence dissent will encourage others to examine the evidence and reveal the truth.
53 posted on 03/13/2007 2:31:54 PM PDT by be4everfree (Liberals are "Thick as a Brick" ......JT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: USMMA_83

So you eat the cake they serve. Enjoy it.


54 posted on 03/13/2007 2:37:07 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Or else your head is up you Darwin do far you can't see truth and fact anymore. I'm just sayin.
55 posted on 03/13/2007 2:38:55 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Now that you mention it, Hitler was a heavy believer in Evolution, thus it was okay to kill "lesser people". I wouldn't say that the lefty,liberal,Democrat,atheist,evolutionist are "Little Hitlers" though. I'd say they are more like John Edwards, nice hair with very little under it.
56 posted on 03/13/2007 2:44:06 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

When you learn to formulate sentences in English, feel free to let me know.


57 posted on 03/13/2007 2:45:46 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: be4everfree
It is only a matter of time before the entire Darwinian fraud comes crashing down.

The demise of the theory of evolution has been imminent for 175 years now. It seems to be surviving the predictions rather well.

Attempts to silence dissent will encourage others to examine the evidence and reveal the truth.

Strange. Nobody seems to be "silencing the dissent" in Knoxville -- or anywhere else IDers can be found pushing their wares. And nobody I'm aware of is stopping the Discovery Institute from doing actual research.

Could it be that others already have "examined the evidence" for ID and found it wanting?

58 posted on 03/13/2007 2:52:44 PM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Sorry about the typo, I saw it as I already punched "post". But I figured some shallow person would point it out to me. Thanks


59 posted on 03/13/2007 2:54:18 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs

"The straw man is that you cannot believe in the Christian God ID concept unless you believe the Earth is 10,000 years old and the Bible is 100% fact."

Bullinger did some interesting research interpreting the scriptures regarding this, and shows how an earth much older than 10,000 years is consistent with what the scriptures say. Many have misinterpreted the scriptures in believing the earth is only 10,000 years old. Also explained are dinosaurs, etc.

See Genesis 1:1,1:2, in PDF format:

http://www.companionbiblecondensed.com/


60 posted on 03/13/2007 2:55:14 PM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-392 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson