*************
That captures it perfectly, fb!
Posted on 03/11/2007 2:11:19 PM PDT by Alter Kaker
Unbelievable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALDfwXIYUX0
"That video is 18 years old."
But Rudy is still pro-abortion.
But Rudy says his views on abortion haven't changed and aren't going to.
I think they are coming from moderates/social libs (who are fiscally and militarily conservative) and the new libertarian wing which has sprung up in recent years. Others I believe only know Guiliani in terms of 9/11. They look at him as "America's Mayor". However, they don't realize "America's Mayor's" social policies are very much in line with the Democratic party. My hope is that the public learns of his true positions before it's too late.
A liberal Democrat I frequently talk to was gloating it would be a "moral victory" for Dems if we selected Guiliani. I frankly agreed with him, and I rarely agree with him.
Fortunately their value does not end with the abortionist. Their value lies in their Creator, who welcomes them home with open arms and will judge the abortionist and the country that allows, no flaunts, the destruction of His little ones.
From the song "Stuart," by the Dead Milkmen...
*************
That captures it perfectly, fb!
Translation:
Lack of morals, lack of leadership, finger in the wind.
Hardly. He gave two pro-choice speeches to them. One said abortion was a Constitutional right. The other praised Margaret Sanger.
BFLR
You think Rudy will do an EO? What puff & nonsense!
You think Rudy will do an EO? What puff & nonsense!
What puff & nonsense!
Puff & nonsense!
Ok, you must be right ... after all, so you say!
Puff & nonsense!
Perhaps because a sound Constitutionalist does not believe the written document cleaves unto his (or her) personal opinion ... not to mention there is an epochal battle raging betwixt evil & Christendom.
A sound Constitutionalist does not believe the written document cleaves unto his (or her) personal opinion ... not to mention there is an epochal battle raging betwixt evil & Christendom.
I would prefer a truly well-married man but, if he appoints strict constructionists, it -- being his marital life -- really doesn't matter to me ....
Why do you think it's appropriate to exploit the bodies of dead babies to make your case? Do they not deserve some semblence of privacy and respect in their darkest hour? God knows, they did not get it in the short life they had.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
