Posted on 03/08/2007 11:40:55 PM PST by conservative in nyc
The Dixie Chicks have a movie, Shut Up & Sing, coming out today, and, to keep things lively, they're staging a grudge match with the worst site on the Internet, political-rhetoric division.
"The fat chick will only drive traffic to this site," writes one poster to the site.
"The Frenchy Chix can't get a gig in a gay bar in Ithaca," writes another.
Others chime in with more corruptions: Chubby Chicks, Ditsy Twits, Vichy Chicks.
"Yep typical liberals," says someone else. "No character."
This is Free Republic, an exercise in political extremism that, despite being and something of an anthropological train wreck, keeps popping up square in the mainstream.
Most recently, it has resurfaced as a villain in the Dixie Chicks movie, which traces the fallout from lead singer Natalie Maines's infamous 2003 London declaration that she was embarrassed that George W. Bush was, like her, from Texas.
It was a bad time to be anti-war, and Americans are touchy about being criticized on foreign soil at the best of times. The "grassroots" backlash that followed -- orchestrated, in part, by the people at Free Republic, who mobilized their large and largely disgruntled membership -- saw the band savaged in the press and at the box office.
The site is a venerable and storied Web forum for American arch-conservatives. Funded by member donations, it was founded in 1996 as an anti-Clinton grandstand, and soon became a place where members could post news stories and discuss them -- though "discussion" might be the wrong word. More often, it's a kind of pantomime, where the name of the game is to cheer the good guy and boo the bad guy every time he creeps on stage.
Freepers, as the sites denizens are known, are the good guys. The bad guys, according to site founder Jim Robinson, are practitioners of "liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism," and "wacko environmentalism."
So it is that, day in and day out, Freepers attempt to outdo each other in posting the most pungent, juvenile reactions to stories. Articles containing an opposing viewpoint have the words "BARF ALERT" appended to their titles. Slurs are encouraged. When the first same-sex Canadian soldiers were married last year, the story garnered 73 angry responses, ranging from "Disgusting and despicable" to "I'd resign my commission before performing a ceremony to marry a couple of bone-smugglers" to "Let's see what happens when the Canadian military has an AIDS epidemic on its hands."
It's a hateful place that, if the world was working as it should, would be relegated to the Internet's endless fringes, where conspiracy theorists and pyramid-power believers roam the wasteland. But what's interesting about Free Republic is that, despite having attracted a crowd of the most paranoid, xenophobic and reactionary characters the political landscape has to offer, it continues to find itself in the news.
For instance, during the 2004 U.S. presidential election, it was central to the network of websites that uncovered the forged memos about Bush's Vietnam service that appeared on CBS News and ultimately cost Dan Rather his job. (Paranoia, in this instance, paid off.) Later, and less admirably, Jerome Corsi, the co-author of Unfit for Command -- the hatchet job about John Kerry's military service that crippled his campaign -- was found to be posting racist, sexist diatribes on the site.
And then there was the flap about the Dixie Chicks, spurred on by zealous Freepers. Thanks to their movie, Free Republic is getting another moment in the sun. Not helping things was the band's manager publicly calling Robinson "a coward" for refusing to be interviewed for the film. ("I am jealous of you Mr. Robinson," declared one Freeper in response. "You have been singled out and attacked by America's premier Entertraitors.") These, ladies and gentlemen, are grassroots at work. There are a lot of organizations out there that are in the business of whipping their members into a lather and unleashing them on corporations and politicians alike.
But if Free Republic has a virtue, it's that, unlike other pressure groups, it's transparent: You can see the cogs turning, the anger mounting, the members joining the half-baked me-too condemnations that will surface on tomorrow's news agenda. It's like a glass ant farm for zealots. It's a little stomach-turning, but man, they're diligent little things. It's hard not to stare sometimes.
PING!
We be ants, and we're EVERYWHERE!
Holy cow. I clicked on the "absolute proof" link. Yep, barking moonbats, all right.
Graybeard,
Didn't mean to toss anything at you. Sorry, definitely came off the wrong way. I meant, when reading the DU post, that I couldn't be sure if the rabbit cage post on over there was intended seriously or not. I (me, myself and I) was *definitely* on the wrong website when I was on DU. The use of "you" was what my linguistic professor used to call "second person inclusive", meaning the listener, the speaker and others.
No slam towards you intended, believe me.
My goodness, that's all very interesting.
______________________________________________________
And, verified on a number of threads by quotes from her his own posts.
Then this idiot has obviously not perused the site for very long. He must have gotten his opinion from DUh or the KosKids.
I understand. Thanks for the explanation.
After posting my reply it occurred, to me that you possibly meant it the way you explained it.
We are in agreement, sorry for the misunderstanding.
It was even bigger than their last tour. ;')
ROTFLMAO
Funny, we had a President and Chairman, after the first year I never served in either of those positions. We set it up that way so no one person could control it nor commandeer it.
On the other hand, you're leadership has never changed. Some of your ex-members contacted me and said the top down oppression is the reason they left.
You deserve an extraordinary amount of credit for the above, Bob J. One of the biggest problems with grassroots organizations (and it is at the top of the list if not the very top) is that the same people run and control them for years, stifling not only ideas which are extremely important to the development of effectiveness and the establishment of a good reputation, but also the growth of membership. It is difficult, particularly for founders of groups to abdicate that kind of control, but when they do, it is a strong indication of true integrity and character.
Yet can't comb his hair!!!Go figure!
Thanks Terri, it was nice of you to say that.
Seconded!
The article is nothing more than a Stalinist Media (aka far left MSM) diatribe against political dissent written by one of the free market flunkies which dominate the Stalinist Media.
;-)
C'mon, you're being disingenuous. Yes, there are conspiracy theorists on DU, but there are on FR too, and they're far from the majority at either discussion board. If you actually read the DU thread linked to you'll see it pretty much all people mocking the guy for being ridiculous.
Misrepresenting people you don't agree with is a crummy tactic coming from either side.
But:
"is this really how we FReepers want to be perceived - as a crowd of "the most paranoid, xenophobic and reactionary characters the political landscape has to offer"
Sounds an awful lot like what I expect RNC sessions to come up with, what GWB and every RINO in the country thinks when someone, anyone, says they've been less than nice.
Same advice goes to FR as to the 'Pubs;
suck it up and listen to your base.
I didn't misrepresent anyone at D.U. They are all morons.
Wonder if it's anything like I've heard about you from FRN boardmembers?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.