Posted on 03/07/2007 11:44:13 PM PST by neverdem
One of the more embarrassing mysteries of human evolution is that people are host to no fewer than three kinds of louse while most species have just one.
Even bleaker for the human reputation, the pubic louse, which gets its dates and residence-swapping opportunities when its hosts are locked in intimate embrace, does not seem to be a true native of the human body. Its closest relative is the gorilla louse. (Dont even think about it.)
Louse specialists now seem at last to have solved the question of how people came by their superabundance of fellow travelers. And in doing so they have shed light on the two major turning points in the history of fashion: when people lost their body hair, and when they first made clothing.
Three kinds of louse call Homo sapiens their home, but each occupies a different niche on the human body. The head louse, Pediculus humanus, lives in the forest of fine hairs on the scalp. Its cousin, the body louse, lives not on the skin but in clothes. And the exclusive territory of the pubic louse, Phthirus pubis, is the coarser hairs of the crotch.
Lice are intimately adapted to their hosts and cannot long survive away from the bodys blood and warmth. If their host evolves into two species, the lice will do likewise. So biologists have long been puzzled over the fact that the human head louse is a sister species to the chimpanzee louse, but the pubic louse is closely related to the gorilla louse.
By comparing louse DNA, a team led by David L. Reed of the University of Florida has now reconstructed how this strange situation probably came about. Dr. Reeds team collected pubic lice from a public health clinic in Salt Lake City. Samples of gorilla lice...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Thanks Elsie...you have made my point, better than I could have...what I notice that it is the KJV of the Bible that uses the word 'unicorn'...all the other Bibles use a different word, wild-ox or wild-oxen..
Now, I have had some folks tell me, that the really only acceptable translation of the Bible, is the KJV, and they also have told me, that when the KJV Bible was put together, those men were under the direct divine inspiration, and that every word, every phrase, even every comma, and period, and every point of punctuation was put there under direct divine inspiration...meaning that nothing in the KJV could be mistakenly translated..that every word means exactly what it says...
So, if one adheres to the notion, that the KJV is the only
Bible that is acceptable for study, and if one further goes on to state the the KJV is absolutely correct in every word, phrase and punctuation, and that everything must be read literally as is, then how does on explain the 'unicorns'...
This seems to come down to saying, that 'unicorns' are for real, that they really do/did exist, because after all the KJV of the Bible, could not be mistaken, and the word should stand for what it is...and I have heard people argue for this very fact...I have not heard this on FR, but there are many other websites on the net, and some dedicated to strict adherence to the KJV and to the literal translation of every word, and on one of those sites, there really was a discussion, with people saying that 'unicorns' really did exist because the KJV Bible says so...
Well, then, either the KJV translators were mistaken when using the word unicorn, or unicorns really did exist...I guess it all depends on how one wants to look at this....and how important is it, that one insist on using only the KJV?
Your post shows this, quite well...so thanks...
If put aside nearly 10,000 conflicting-bickering-sometimes hostile sects of christianity in the USA alone (more elsewhere with many conflicting sects in Judaism and Mohammedism) and putting aside the false translations, redacted translations, conflicting accounts, outright historical inaccuracies, constant bickering over canon in both old testaments-intererum year texts-and new tesatments--put that aside for a moment: Think about the animals translated from the "unknown" Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and Latin words (some sects reject the Latin because its Catholic while others reject the Hebrew because its Jewish) for the mysterious Leviathan (fire breathing and non fire breathing no less), the fiery serpant of Moses, the absurd detailed breeding habits of the ostrich, the use of the term Orion's Belt in Job (a book attributed to the time of Abraham by many "scholars") when Orion was a diety in a much later foreign religion, the sea serpant that kills sinners in the deepest depths of the sea, the four legged birds, dragons, whales that swallow humans, snakes on Malta, poisonous snakes found on Malta, the catch-all "creaping things" described by an all-knowing God, the famous fowl called a bat, earthquakes from sin that shake the world out of its foundations, firmaments miles away not light years, the physics of 100 lb hailstones hitting the earth in such mass quantities that are reserved in a vault in heaven (with survivors no less in an unaffected atmosphere), the mythos of a flat earth, stars following wise men, mustard herbs becoming trees strong enough to hold birds nests, mustard seeds claimed as the smallest seed, and of course the moon giving light before the sun is made days AFTER plants grow on the earth...it's utterly fascinating. And it's the real truth.
Mom, this is the true ID science of creation. Do not argue. Do not think. Accept. And become ye holy as God is holy. For God lies not nor cannot lie but gives strong lies to those that deny His truth.
BTW, funny thng about grammar and punctuation marks...
All texts were devoid of such things prior to Medievel literature. Since the Bible was reportedly written several thousand years ago, it would be wise for people to think about the curse God's servants put on the Bible that says:
Whoever takes away anything from the Bible their names will be removed from "The Book of Life" and anyone that adds anything to the Bible will receive the additional plagues reserved for really really bad people like Gog, Magog, and those poor Amalakites that God judged long ago will never be given mercy even though He also said He delays His coming that all may be given mercy and saved.
Just a FYI on grammar and another lesson in godly wisdom that is far superior than logic and our limited reasoning abilities.
I did once go through this with someone, who took the stand that only the KJV of the Bible, should be acceptable to any true upstanding Christian...I said, well, how did those who put together the KJV Bible decide where to put the punctuation since it was not there to begin with...Oh, I was assured, all those who put together the KJV of the Bible, were operating under direct divine inspiration, and that they could not ever have been mistaken about even the smallest thing such as a period or a comma...God somehow told them where to put all those commas and periods...so I ask again, did God tell those who put together the KJV that 'unicorns' were real?
Some one else once tried to assert that the Bible was actually originally written English, but then thats another story altogether...
Your list in your post #44 gives one quite a list of things to ponder...thank you, Rev. Sully
Yup, them KJV only folks have made an IDOL out of the translation.
It should be obvious to anyone with an ounce of sense that the ONLY way to understand 'scripture' is to read it in the ORIGINAL language!
(Pity the poor Spainard, Frank, German, Italian, Korean or Hindu that cannot read the ENGLISH language KJV!)
I'm sure glad there are many folks who HAVE desired to know the facts from the original languages.
Even more, the one's of that group who want to let the REST of us in on what they mean by giving us (no doubt to the best of their abilities) what the old languages are saying, but putting it into something I can understand.
(Listen in to a bunch of our teenagers talking amongst themselves some time. WE need an 'interpreter' for that!! ;^)
So, in your opinion, is there a GOD?
Pack the area with dry ice twenty minutes before starting the fire. It weakens them, they can't run as fast, and are better targets for the ice pick!!!!
Well, Elsie, very often you and I dont agree on many issues, but on this issue of demanding that one must use only the KJV of the Bible, I am in complete agreement with you...
I also agree with you about the teenagers...tho my younger son is now 32, I rarely understand what he is talking about, when he decides to talk to me about his job(hes an engineer)....at that point, I just roll my eyes, and say, as long as you are good at what you do, and are happy doing it, and you make a fine living, dont give me the details, as I dont understand a word of what you are saying(I guess at that point, having an 'interpreter' would be handy)
Anyway, glad to see that you are open enough to allow for the ability of versions of the Bible, other than the KJV, to be totally acceptable...I will admit, I had you pegged as a KJV only, and I am very glad to find out that I was wrong...
Aha! You've just said you don't read my posts very closely!!
;^)
MOST of my Scriptures come from the New International Version (NIV). My headbone memory bank tends to remember a lot of KJV stuff from my youth that I memorized. (I think the NIV came in around 69-73 time frame, so I've daated myself.)
I usually leave the NIV (or ANY version) in front of the verse that I'm posting so folks won't have to look it up.
I also tend to always post the verses about which I am speaking instead of just the reference numbers. (No need for folks to look them up on their own - If I do the work, I get to refresh my memory at the same time!)
I usually leave the NIV (or ANY version) in front of the verse that I'm posting so folks won't have to look it up.
(See post #30 - this thread)
Now, Now, Elsie, dont jump to conclusions, that I dont read your posts very closely...I read your posts, I just dont pay attention to which version of the Bible you are using....there is a difference, you know...
Why Humans and Their Fur Parted Ways
New York Times (Science Times) | August 19, 2003 | Nicholas Wade
Posted on 08/19/2003 5:41:06 AM PDT by Pharmboy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/966532/posts
Lice offer clues to origin of clothing
USA TODAY | 8/18/2003 | Tim Friend
Posted on 08/20/2003 3:05:55 PM PDT by demloser
Edited on 04/13/2004 1:41:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/967519/posts
In Lice, Clues to Human Origin and Attire
NY Times | March 8, 2007 | Nicholas Wade
Posted on 03/07/2007 11:44:13 PM PST by neverdem
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1797237/posts
Rat Genes Shed Light On Ancient Human Migrations
New Scientist | 2-1-2008 | Emma Young
Posted on 02/01/2008 2:42:13 PM PST by blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1963478/posts
Lice From Mummies Provide Clues To Ancient Migrations
IHT | 2-6-2008 | John Noble Wilford
Posted on 02/06/2008 5:34:40 PM PST by blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1966182/posts
|
|
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach | |
Just updating the GGG information, not sending a general distribution. |
|
|
|
|
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach | |
Note: this topic is dated 3/07/2007. |
|
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.