Posted on 03/03/2007 5:38:03 PM PST by ZULU
"Therefore, we wholeheartedly support the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive strikes on known terrorist states and organizations that are believed to present a clear threat to our freedom or national security. We support our military, our troops and our Commander-in-Chief and we oppose turning control of our government back over to the liberals and socialists who favor appeasement, weakness, and subserviency. We do not believe in surrendering to the terrorists as France, Germany, Russia and Spain have done and as Kerry, Kennedy, Clinton and the Democrats, et al, are proposing.
As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty. "
Thanks, and Mc5 is fine with me. Like they say, call me anything but don't call me late for dinner. :))
"The best way to handle the bashers and other assorted troublemakers is to simply ignore them. Don't respond to them, don't argue with them, and don't talk about them in your other posts. Try it, I believe you'll be pleased with how well it works. /grin"
It can, however, be fun to discuss them behind their back via freepmail with others who think they are a pain as well.
Alas, no more good work from B50. He be sleepin' with the fishies.
Yeah, she supports the man whom I think is Hillary's hand picked opponent. I've always been amazed that Rudy bailed out of that senate race when he might have won. But now here he is, healthy and happy and ready to take it again.
Fool me once...shame on you.
Well, I'm sick and tired of all you extreme right wackos...so I guess we're even.
Whether you like it or not, the Democratic Party is run by socialist liberals who want a Nanny State. IOW, there's no place for me in their house.
That leaves the Republican Party. It IS called the Republican Party...not the Conservative Party.
If you want the party all to yourselves....start your own damned party.
I must have missed the memo that I had to pass a litmus test to be feel welcomed in here.
I hate liberals almost as much as I hate conservatives with superiority complexes.
He might still be reading. And there's always his pal, Barrett60BMG.
But why should he? He has never said a bad word about her.
LOL!
Nice try, EEE. ZULU hijacked his own thread right out of the gate, using your logic.
Don't need one, I've got a hard head!lol!
Thought you might like to know that noob we toyed with the other night has been ozoned!
Me too (grin)
I see you are a professor...liberal or conservative?
He/she's dead.
I'd call myself a conservative with a mean libertarian streak.
Sounds like you need a vacation.
Its primary time.
Rudy was also a Democrat. The difference between Reagan and Giuliani was Reagan had a philophical rebirth which antidated his run for President. I see no indication of a philosophical rebirth in Giuliani, just equivocation. And some of the comments he made about conservatives in his little You-Tube flick were particularly biting. I would WELCOME any sincere effort on his part to redefine himself as a national candidate instead of the mayor of one of the most socialistic cities in America. He could make a good argument for what he did in that role, vis-a-vis his aspirations for higher office. That would make a LOT of people a heck of a lot more comfortable with him.
As for your assertion that his philosophies are in part in conformance with Republican ones, I can only state this appears to be the case with respect to the war on terror. But then so are Joe Liberman's. And THAT doesn't make HIM a Republican.
AGAIN, posting the philosphical statement upon which this forum was founded and questioning the political philosphy of a candidate with respect to those philosophies is a valid question. It hardly equates to the lunatic Bush-bashing of the far left.
I resent the flood of media coverage extended to Giuliani to the exclusion of other viable candidates out there. I KNOW where their leanings lie philosophically with respect to ours.
And I think it is a good thing to make most Republicans aware of the potential flaws in a candidate, especially ones which could loose him support of his base and turn the White House over to Hillery. I'm SURE the Democrats will make EVERY EFFORT to do so themselves in the course of the campaign should he be nomianted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.