Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Current FR Poll - Indirect Vote For Hillary?
FR

Posted on 02/21/2007 9:07:52 AM PST by Sonora

Here's the tally so far - this vote sort of looks like the "attitude" that was being displayed here as we were heading for the loss of the House and Senate - third party and undecided, and stay home versus voting for a social R will result in a Democrat in the White House - trust me on this! Please don't let it happen. But, I'm beginning to believe that it will happen.

______

Looks like our true blue conservative did pretty well in our prior poll. Let's now see what happens if we nominate a social liberal who's okay with abortion, gay unions and gay rights is a gun grabber and is weak on illegal immigration. Who do you vote for in the general?

Composite Opinion The social liberal with the big "R" 32.4% 1,424 Third party 28.6% 1,256 Undecided/praying 26.5% 1,164 Stay home 9.9% 435 Hillary, et al 2.5% 110 99.9% 4,389

Member Opinion The social liberal with the big "R" 34.3% 780 Third party 28.3% 644 Undecided/praying 28.2% 641 Stay home 8.2% 187 Hillary, et al 1.1% 24 100.1% 2,276

Non-Member Opinion The social liberal with the big "R" 30.5% 644 Third party 29.0% 612 Undecided/praying 24.8% 523 Stay home 11.7% 248 Hillary, et al 4.1% 86 100.1% 2,113


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: callthewaaaambulance; crybaby; onlylibscanwin; poll; waaaaaah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: penowa

We each will be responsible before God for our vote.

I cannot imagine standing before Him having voted in any way that put Shrillery in power.


81 posted on 02/21/2007 7:44:02 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Sonora

Let's now see what happens if we nominate a social liberal who's okay with abortion, gay unions and gay rights is a gun grabber and is weak on illegal immigration.

-

So don't nominate a RINO.

It's not complicated.


82 posted on 02/21/2007 7:49:17 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (Mr. President: PARDON NACHO AND JOSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penowa

I too think it's exceedingly horrid when the choices are between a combination of Marx/Stalin/Machiavelli

vs

who . . . an idiot socialist RINO?

And McChurian would be horribly worse than Guillani.

Nevertheless, we may be required to make fine distinctions between a list of globalist evil doers.

The puppet masters are doing all they can to insure that they run things exclusively behind the scenes regardless. But it still makes a horrible difference to have someone like Shrillery in the President's position of power.

She is orders of magnitude worse than the rest of them.


83 posted on 02/21/2007 7:56:28 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

So, just lose to a democrat liberal - is that what you want as a result, simply because no one is in the race that you care to vote for?

No compromise will doom conservatives at this point.


84 posted on 02/22/2007 8:04:16 AM PST by Sonora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Sonora
Hey, take this as fair warning. If the GOP puts up a liberal, they're going to lose. Only a crazy man sees the writing on the wall clearly and doessn't change tactics.

Give us a conservative, or embrace defeat. Those are the choices for the GOP.
85 posted on 02/22/2007 8:08:20 AM PST by Antoninus ("For some, the conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it's my hope." -Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
Apparently the polls here in '99 and 2000 looked about the same, with G.W.Bush at around 1/3 and many proclaiming they'd stay home or vote 3rd party.

This is nothing like 2000. I was a big G. W. Bush supporter as was all of my family and most of my friends. None of these people are Rudy McRomney supporters.

The GOP has a bad problem if we don't find a better candidate who can rally the base.
86 posted on 02/22/2007 8:11:01 AM PST by Antoninus ("For some, the conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it's my hope." -Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: #1CTYankee
Joe is no Conservative, he's for a strong national defense, pro WOT and for school vouchers, that's the only conservative views he has.

Sounds better than Rudy, frankly. At least he was pro-life at one point in his career, too.
87 posted on 02/22/2007 8:11:40 AM PST by Antoninus ("For some, the conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it's my hope." -Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET
I refuse to vote for a liberal, regardless of party.

Bingo-bango!
88 posted on 02/22/2007 8:12:08 AM PST by Antoninus ("For some, the conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it's my hope." -Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sonora

I agree.

I've been posting to this effect for the past week.


89 posted on 02/22/2007 8:13:34 AM PST by Scarchin (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

OK, let's go with that as it's my first choice also.

Who is the candidate that you have in mind for 2008 (that can win)?


90 posted on 02/22/2007 8:41:02 AM PST by Sonora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

Well, we are almost alone here as some posters as saying that we will loss if we put up a conservative - well, we don't have one, especially one with no baggage.

If this group is an indicator - we are doomed in 2008!

We have got to compromise and address terror as the primary goal. Rudy is the man. Sufficient pressure can be apply to maintain conservative values at least at the current level, but with a democrat in the White House, it would be much more difficult at all levels.

Come on people, Wake Up!


91 posted on 02/22/2007 8:47:11 AM PST by Sonora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Sonora
Who is the candidate that you have in mind for 2008 (that can win)?

See tagline.
92 posted on 02/22/2007 8:57:07 AM PST by Antoninus ("For some, the conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it's my hope." -Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Sonora
If this group is an indicator - we are doomed in 2008!

Crying about it won't help.

Rudy is the man.

I had a feeling you were a Rudy-bot. Hate to break it to you--Rudy can't win. And he won't win.
93 posted on 02/22/2007 8:58:38 AM PST by Antoninus ("For some, the conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it's my hope." -Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

OK, so what is the support for Hunter on this site?

He should be ranked 1st, right?


94 posted on 02/22/2007 9:06:41 AM PST by Sonora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

I'm not crying about anything, just stated the facts as I interpret them. Don't be such a Bumpkin.


95 posted on 02/22/2007 9:07:41 AM PST by Sonora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

I'd vote for Zell Miller, Democrat, over any of the current Republican front runners, Romney, McCain, or Guiliani.

'Course, Democrats don't much like him or his type any more.


96 posted on 02/22/2007 9:11:10 AM PST by Little Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sonora
OK, so what is the support for Hunter on this site? He should be ranked 1st, right?

He's first or second after Newt--after less than a month of campaigning. What's your point? Rudy's in the 10-15% range--which is where he'll be among the general public when people actually find out he's almost as liberal as the Clintons.
97 posted on 02/22/2007 9:13:34 AM PST by Antoninus ("For some, the conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it's my hope." -Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Sonora

Why do people keep talking about a "perfect" candidate. A candidate doesn't have to be perfect, he just has to NOT be a total disaster. Being pro-abortion, pro-gun control, pro-illegal, pro-gay, and pro-Kyoto, Rudy definitely qualifies as a disaster.


98 posted on 02/22/2007 9:18:09 AM PST by Little Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Sonora

"OK, very logically stated, but what if a true conservative isn't running?"

Tom Tancredo-Duncan Hunter.


99 posted on 02/22/2007 9:54:45 AM PST by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: penowa

"because the voting has been rigged this time with CA and several other big liberal states thrown into the mix before the south has a say, the chances of getting a liberal nominee have been pre-arranged IMO."

Bears repeating. The GOP appears to have a death wish, moving to the left will definately do the job.


100 posted on 02/22/2007 10:01:24 AM PST by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson