Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Current FR Poll - Indirect Vote For Hillary?
FR

Posted on 02/21/2007 9:07:52 AM PST by Sonora

Here's the tally so far - this vote sort of looks like the "attitude" that was being displayed here as we were heading for the loss of the House and Senate - third party and undecided, and stay home versus voting for a social R will result in a Democrat in the White House - trust me on this! Please don't let it happen. But, I'm beginning to believe that it will happen.

______

Looks like our true blue conservative did pretty well in our prior poll. Let's now see what happens if we nominate a social liberal who's okay with abortion, gay unions and gay rights is a gun grabber and is weak on illegal immigration. Who do you vote for in the general?

Composite Opinion The social liberal with the big "R" 32.4% 1,424 Third party 28.6% 1,256 Undecided/praying 26.5% 1,164 Stay home 9.9% 435 Hillary, et al 2.5% 110 99.9% 4,389

Member Opinion The social liberal with the big "R" 34.3% 780 Third party 28.3% 644 Undecided/praying 28.2% 641 Stay home 8.2% 187 Hillary, et al 1.1% 24 100.1% 2,276

Non-Member Opinion The social liberal with the big "R" 30.5% 644 Third party 29.0% 612 Undecided/praying 24.8% 523 Stay home 11.7% 248 Hillary, et al 4.1% 86 100.1% 2,113


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: callthewaaaambulance; crybaby; onlylibscanwin; poll; waaaaaah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

To: twonie

Joe Lieberman is a liberal who just happens to understand the danger of radical Islam. He would be worse than Giuliani on other issues.


62 posted on 02/21/2007 11:11:03 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: The Danger is Near

Of course I support electing as many conservatives across the baord in all positions as much as possible everywhere all the time.

I also have to live in the real world presented to me vs the one I wish were the case.

One of my highest priorities along with electing as many conservatives as possible is keeping Bw*tch Shrillery out of the Whiite House by every legal means possible.

That probably means being realistic about the general Presidential election if Rudy is the GOP side.

I've been down the Perot road before. I do not plan to go back.


63 posted on 02/21/2007 11:15:55 AM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
I believe that it is likely that Republicans will never win another major election. We are hopelessly split. The conservtives won't vote for the moderates and the moderates won't vote for the conservatives. Without each other, we cannot possibly come up with the numbers to keep Hillary out of the WH.

We just had a disaster of an election here in Iowa. I have no idea if the purists stayed home or not but if anyone is paying attention, they know what the Democrats have done to this state in one month.

So far they've passed a huge raise in the minimum wage. They're working on repealing Iowa's right-to-work law; repeal the ban on human cloning; they're in the process of raising the cig tax $1.00 a pack, expand gambling; provide for public financing of campaigns; passed an "anti-bullying" bill, which really provides special protections for homosexuals; they're trying to expand early childhood education to include newborns to three year olds plus mandatory preschool for all children.

These are just the issues I've thought of off the top of my head. I'm sure there are more. They have changed Iowa in the worst way in a very short period of time.

This proves the need for us to fight it out in the primay and then hang together to defeat the RATS. Otherwise they defeat us.

64 posted on 02/21/2007 11:25:41 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Quix

I agree that a Hillary Clinton presidency would be a disaster.


65 posted on 02/21/2007 11:32:14 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

Thx.

Therefore, what do you suggest between now and then?

FREEPERS CAN have a big impact.


66 posted on 02/21/2007 11:42:03 AM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: twonie
There is one: Joe Lieberman. Is he running?

He's only conservative on foreign affairs, specifically the War on Terror. Otherwise he's even more liberal than the liberal Republican candidates.

67 posted on 02/21/2007 11:46:35 AM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

Vote for a liberal - you'll get liberalism
Don't vote (D/L). Don't vote (R/L). Don't vote for a letter of the alphabet.
Vote for a philosophy.
Vote for a Conservative, and you'll get Conservatism.

OK, very logically stated, but what if a true conservative isn't running? Result - don't vote, get a liberal, right? So, your philosophy goes down the drain for years, right? It's insanity, right?


68 posted on 02/21/2007 11:49:20 AM PST by Sonora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
The conservtives won't vote for the moderates and the moderates won't vote for the conservatives.

They'll vote for each other...but they won't vote for liberals.
69 posted on 02/21/2007 11:50:12 AM PST by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: P-40

What is the difference between a moderate Republican and a liberal Republican?


70 posted on 02/21/2007 11:59:39 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
What is the difference between a moderate Republican and a liberal Republican?

A lot....one would hope. Moderate Republicans take the government checkbook out fairly often, but usually for at least a half-way good reason. Liberal Republicans can't put it away. We have a lot of Liberal Republicans in office right now but they could become more moderate if faced with long-term unemployment.
71 posted on 02/21/2007 12:06:30 PM PST by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: P-40

Sounds good but there is a lot of overlapping. It's good to threaten them in the primaries. We need to be doing more of this.


72 posted on 02/21/2007 12:14:10 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: psjones
Do that, yu and a few others and we could just very well end up with queen hillary in the white house.
Sigh, we got 8 years of bill and hill because people voted third party and now we may just see a repeat of history in 2008. Do you guys really want to see the clintons and their immoral lying faces back in the white house?

Would it make you feel better if they have an "R" by their name? A liberal, is a liberal, is a liberal, and no matter how hard you try, you can't remove the "L" from Rudy's, John's or Mitt's name! Some have lied, at least one has cheated and all support things that God is against. Abortion, homosexuality, adultery, lies, etc.

IF we support them we support what they stand for, and the way my Bible reads is that we are told to have nothing to do with these kind of men, because we have NOTHING in common with them. Their actions can bring Judgment on America. THAT is the dilemma that Christians have. THAT is why Bible believing Christians can't vote for any one of them. None of them are going to be sitting in Judgment of me, so I have to do what pleases God, and if that puts Hillary into office, then so be it.

So, before people vote for RINOS, they need to take a look at their electability, because they are NOT going to make it without the "Religious Right." Perhaps those who are supporting RINOS/LIBERALS should move to the right and support CONSERVATIVES so that they don't put Hillary in as POTUS!

73 posted on 02/21/2007 12:30:44 PM PST by NRA2BFree (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRESIDENT IN 2008! HE IS AN HONEST CONSERVATIVE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

To: CharlesWayneCT
Or should be pick our next nominee based on which one has supporters that are most likely to turn psychotically destructive? Frankly, I'm not sure I want a candidate that attracts those kind of people.

"Psychotically destructive"?

Charles, are you referring to me?

75 posted on 02/21/2007 1:40:33 PM PST by SIDENET (No votes for RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sonora
Rudy's a Democrat not a Republican. Bottom line, I won't vote for a Democrat, regardless of the letter he chooses to place next to his name.

The vast majority of Rudy supporters would vote for Hilary if she put an "R" next to her name.

76 posted on 02/21/2007 1:45:23 PM PST by Marine Inspector (Shhh, I’m hunting RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

I don't know, are you psychotically destructive?

You have to admit, it's a pretty cool description though, right?


77 posted on 02/21/2007 1:54:01 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Why would any person supporting a candidate give in to such threats?

It's not a threat. I refuse to vote for a liberal, regardless of party, period.

78 posted on 02/21/2007 1:56:57 PM PST by SIDENET (No votes for RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
You have to admit, it's a pretty cool description though, right?

Well, all of the voices in my head seem to like it.

;-)

79 posted on 02/21/2007 1:57:49 PM PST by SIDENET (No votes for RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Quix
"I've been down the Perot road before. I do not plan to go back."

If the Republican party nominates Giuliani, you are guaranteeing the "Perot road" again. Many of us will NOT under any circumstances vote for a liberal of either party. Since I will have NO vote in the primaries in selecting the nominee because PA holds their primary long after both parties have chosen their nominees, and because the voting has been rigged this time with CA and several other big liberal states thrown into the mix before the south has a say, the chances of getting a liberal nominee have been pre-arranged IMO. My choice will come in the general and for the very first time, I'm not going to hold my nose and vote for anybody the Republicans foist on us. I will vote 3rd party or not at all, and I'm NOT alone.

80 posted on 02/21/2007 7:33:57 PM PST by penowa (NO more Bushes; NO more Clintons EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson